Yes yes yes YESThread suggestion:
Google “The Patchwork House CIC, Paignton”
Yes yes yes YESThread suggestion:
Google “The Patchwork House CIC, Paignton”
Whilst I would love to know the full story because I’m a nosy cow, I agree with what you’re saying and don’t think some things should be shared on here.There is evidence, people here just aren’t privy to it.
I’ve said I’m not going into specific details. Not on such a public forum.
Again I’ll say, I don’t agree with the way she has made this public. I don’t agree with any of the children being used as content. I feel it’s reprehensible that we all know so much. Bit this isn’t as clear cut as many here would like. Just because R is abhorrent it does not mean someone else is any better.
Forgive me for not recalling. But I am assuming, given your knowledge, that one of the parents involved shared physical proof of the circumstances with you? And they sought you out via Tattle?I’ve explained how before.
You said previously the boys chose ro stop contact not the courts so there must have been a CAO stipulating boys live with Joyce and see S. Kids views and choice are important though. I can see how awful this would have become. I dont know what id do if my ex had encouraged me to have an abortion, had an affair in the woods and then the new bird went viral with it all. Probably lost it somewhat and not been exemplary.There is evidence, people here just aren’t privy to it.
I’ve said I’m not going into specific details. Not on such a public forum.
Again I’ll say, I don’t agree with the way she has made this public. I don’t agree with any of the children being used as content. I feel it’s reprehensible that we all know so much. Bit this isn’t as clear cut as many here would like. Just because R is abhorrent it does not mean someone else is any better.
The only emotion she can show is laughter, and that’s fake. Oh, and anger, but she tries to conceal that.How can someone be talking about something so serious but then laughs when explaining it!! She is off her tits!
Someone connected to one of them, and neither of the ones you’re thinking.Forgive me for not recalling. But I am assuming, given your knowledge, that one of the parents involved shared physical proof of the circumstances with you? And they sought you out via Tattle?
I can’t think of anyone who would have access to those documents apart from Josh, Rachel and bio mumSomeone connected to one of them, and neither of the ones you’re thinking.
I didn’t. I said contact was stopped at the request of one of the boys following involvement of relevant professional bodies, who were the ones that made the decision. I answered no further questions on the subject as too much detail for a public forum.You said previously the boys chose ro stop contact not the courts so there must have been a CAO stipulating boys live with Joyce and see S. Kids views and choice are important though. I can see how awful this would have become. I dont know what id do if my ex had encouraged me to have an abortion, had an affair in the woods and then the new bird went viral with it all. Probably lost it somewhat and not been exemplary.
Ratchet implies alcoholism, physical abuse, local authority social work involvement but just hints at it which doesnt all fit with a RMN have no restrictions on practice and keeping her registration. Quite disgusting of her to use her platform to do this.
Sometimes kids are better off with their fathers It happens. Kids views carry weight as well
Yet you’ve seen for yourself court documents shared on here relating to the girls.I can’t think of anyone who would have access to those documents apart from Josh, Rachel and bio mum