To be fair, I know the vets where she takes her animals, they are incredible, they aren't
tit. She makes out they are to make herself look/feel better about their animals. I just can't believe that NONE of them notice that the dog had a skin infection, bearing in mind that Josh used to be an animal PC
Agreed, the vets she uses are amazing. I actually don't believe that Ethel was put under before they noticed. I think, like someone else has said, that they will have examined her before putting her under and they will have picked up the infection then. For Rachaeaeaeaele though, that isn't as exciting is it?
'We took Ethel in to have an operation, during the pre-op examination the vet discovered an infection so bad that it wasn't safe to do the surgery and we had to go and collect her'
Not very exciting or dramatic and actually just makes them look like
tit pet owners for not noticing what is obviously a pretty bad infection, that's been there for a while if it's had time to get that bad. Dogs roll about on their back all the
bleeping time, just because it's under her leg doesn't mean you wouldn't see it.
Clearly she's as
tit an animal parent as she is a human parent. If I were her vet, and I'd just been slagged off on social media (when she's posted herself outside the vets enough times that it's easily identifiable) I'd be telling her to find herself a new vet.