Preston Davey Trial

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The difference in the two interviews is staggering, the first one all soft spoken and contributing, I'd say he thought he'd give his false account and then police would disappear. He's extremely pissed off two years later when the whole thing hasn't gone away he's so passive aggressive rolling his eyes and yawning. Don't think I've ever seen such a narcissist, sick, demented pig in all my life
 
  • Like
Reactions: 36
A few points that have occurred to me, having just caught up on yesterday’s live reporting and the summary of the podcast given above. Can they not use location data on the hot tub photo? Where was it, who was there and wtf was going on?! The bruises to his head, omg you can see what is insinuated by the description of them. There’s so many things wrong- am I the most nervous parent ever that I would NOT have had 5 cuddly toys and various blankets in my child’s cot. It’s a suffocation hazard and they weren’t even allowed more than one or two once they were bigger and sleeping in a bed. Describing him snuggling and chewing them makes Preston sound like a pet dog in a crate. Yes I am aware babies chew soft things, my eldest would chew a vest or his own sock because he never wanted a dummy. “Free Willy time”- that’s something I might have done when they were tiny if I was struggling with nappy rash but it’s been largely discounted as helpful and a barrier cream and clean nappy are preferable. I wouldn’t have done that once they were older with larger volume of wee and old enough to rummage their privates (none of mine really did that though I’m aware it’s not uncommon for little boys and they had taken videos of Preston doing it, the sickos). Leaving a baby who is at risk of attachment disorder to cry and whimper so you can prove to yourself he’s manipulative and whiny! That’s one of the most misguided (I’m being generous), cruel and or narcissistic things I’ve heard. I just can’t get over the audacity of JV dismissing the internal injuries. There was nobody else there to cause them on his final day. I think a focus is being made on the bladder because the defence will probably use the doctor’s words about the appearance of his bottom sometimes being seen after a resuscitation to push for reasonable doubt
When they're asking him these questions I'm pretty sure they know the answers, it's just to see what he'll say , will he admit to anything.
Wonder why the hot tub was a sensitive subject for him , going no comment and almost sounding subdued at the memory. Also a baby in a hot tub sounds wild to me, the water is so high, I know they were probably holding him but even if you accidentally let him go that's so dangerous, it's not like a bath or a paddling pool
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19
Sorry I'm not fully caught up on the thread so apologies if this is out of place. I've just been reading through some of the back articles on the Blackpool Gazette after the link was posted to Varleys interview.

I'm now even more confused on Varleys Teaching timeliness.
Apologies I'm tit with links but I'm pretty sure this is correct from various reporting.

He did his teacher training between 2019-2021 (incidentally during mostly covid and lockdown times, remember those days?......)

They began the adoption process in late 2021, and passed stage 1 of the process early 2022. Then they took a break before the 2nd part, I'm pretty sure it was said because he wanted to get his year 11s through their exams as he had had them from the start?
I'm sure one of his teacher colleagues said that. But how if that was his first year as a qualified teacher? Had he been head of year during training?
Also the thing about the prom was when they had Preston with them wasn't it? The meet up at the hotel with colleagues. So that would relate to year 11s/exams, but this is a year later in 2023.

Its not especially relevant i suppose but I can't figure it out.
I was confused by this too, but my teacher friend told me that a lot of their heads of years aren't actually PGCE qualified. So they can't teach a class, but can do a head of year / SENCO type role as they are more pastoral. To teach a class, you do your PGCE.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 21
A few points that have occurred to me, having just caught up on yesterday’s live reporting and the summary of the podcast given above. Can they not use location data on the hot tub photo? Where was it, who was there and wtf was going on?! The bruises to his head, omg you can see what is insinuated by the description of them. There’s so many things wrong- am I the most nervous parent ever that I would NOT have had 5 cuddly toys and various blankets in my child’s cot. It’s a suffocation hazard and they weren’t even allowed more than one or two once they were bigger and sleeping in a bed. Describing him snuggling and chewing them makes Preston sound like a pet dog in a crate. Yes I am aware babies chew soft things, my eldest would chew a vest or his own sock because he never wanted a dummy. “Free Willy time”- that’s something I might have done when they were tiny if I was struggling with nappy rash but it’s been largely discounted as helpful and a barrier cream and clean nappy are preferable. I wouldn’t have done that once they were older with larger volume of wee and old enough to rummage their privates (none of mine really did that though I’m aware it’s not uncommon for little boys and they had taken videos of Preston doing it, the sickos). Leaving a baby who is at risk of attachment disorder to cry and whimper so you can prove to yourself he’s manipulative and whiny! That’s one of the most misguided (I’m being generous), cruel and or narcissistic things I’ve heard. I just can’t get over the audacity of JV dismissing the internal injuries. There was nobody else there to cause them on his final day. I think a focus is being made on the bladder because the defence will probably use the doctor’s words about the appearance of his bottom sometimes being seen after a resuscitation to push for reasonable doubt
old enough to rummage their privates (none of mine really did that though I’m aware it’s not uncommon for little boys and they had taken videos of Preston doing it, the sickos).

self is often a form of self-soothing for very young children. Boys in particular, because their privates are more obvious and easier to access tend to do it more obviously than girls.* It' can be a way of providing themselves with comfort and reassurance if they are in distress, or just the sort of comfort as they are (say) nodding off to sleep, that might otherwise be provided by a dummy. It isn't sexual as it would be in an older child. Most children do it at one time or another, even the most loved and cared-for ones.

It can even be an aid to concentration - young children may touch their genitals while they're concentrating on something else. It's just a pleasurable sensation and most grow out of it as they become more physically active (and back into it as they become pubescent).

I think it's likely that Preston used it as a way of trying to provide himself with safety and comfort. While most children of his age, in his situation, would likely be cuddled and hugged to sleep in a strange place, Preston was left to cope as best he could. (It wouldn't surprise me if he was left alone in a bare cot, with all of the toys "tidied away".)

*Little girls will often sit and rock.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
Up until now I could give JMF enough reasonable doubt but hearing he stayed with JV after all of this has come out, I just cannot see how anyone could do that and not be AT LEAST complicit or knowing what was going on. I presume he would have heard all this information or would this be his first time hearing it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
When they're asking him these questions I'm pretty sure they know the answers, it's just to see what he'll say , will he admit to anything.
Wonder why the hot tub was a sensitive subject for him , going no comment and almost sounding subdued at the memory. Also a baby in a hot tub sounds wild to me, the water is so high, I know they were probably holding him but even if you accidentally let him go that's so dangerous, it's not like a bath or a paddling pool
When they're asking him these questions I'm pretty sure they know the answers

At the risk of sounding flippant, I can tell you that a lifetime of watching "Rumple of the Bailey" and "Cavanagh QC" has taught me that a barrister doesn't ask any question that they don't know the answer to. (Or very rarely). It is toorisky as they may then get a response that haven't prepared for - their cases are built layer by layer with known facts and possible responses (and how to build upon/ counter them). Questioning the accused, as you say, allows any lies to be revealed, and (possibly even more importantly) allows the jury to see what sort of person this is - are they open and honest, arrogant and dismissive, sly, cocky, frightened etc.

Re: the hot tub - I've been in hot tubs (twice - I didn't like them) and apart from the obvious dangers of deep, chlorinated water and slippery babies, surely the temperature is too hot for the comfort of a small child? (Just thinking back to years of testing bathwater with my elbow, here).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
The difference in the two interviews is staggering, the first one all soft spoken and contributing, I'd say he thought he'd give his false account and then police would disappear. He's extremely pissed off two years later when the whole thing hasn't gone away he's so passive aggressive rolling his eyes and yawning. Don't think I've ever seen such a narcissist, sick, demented pig in all my life
Doesn’t exactly scream innocence does it. He’s forgetting there’s a baby at the centre of all this that’s died one way or another. Most people would be distraught and would sit up straight and treat it all with a little respect. He thinks he’s being victimised here, the guy is an utter disgrace and a danger to society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
are the jury seeing all these interviews on video or just seeing transcripts? I ask because I did jury service a few years ago (on an historical child abuse case). The initial interviews with the accused were just transcripts and some of the jury were not sure he had done it. When we saw later interviews his attitude and body language were very telling and they were convinced
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I've just clocked what the police were getting at with their questioning in that latest podcast and then moving to the broken arm.

The bruises. Think about how a baby's face might be bruised if it were repeatedly banged against the structure of a cot, think about how forcefully a movement would have to be to break an elbow and then think about the cot picture we know exists.

I felt sick even writing that.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Sounds like Preston has bruises to his forehead almost constantly. Yes, babies of that age very occasionally bang their heads hard enough to bruise, but the sight of Preston with new bruises appearing on his head all the time should have rang alarm bells. JV’s mother saw him a lot - what on earth did she think?

Her comment at the hospital suggested she had fears that he was being mistreated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
Re: the hot tub - I've been in hot tubs (twice - I didn't like them) and apart from the obvious dangers of deep, chlorinated water and slippery babies, surely the temperature is too hot for the comfort of a small child? (Just thinking back to years of testing bathwater with my elbow, here).
Children under 5 shouldn't be in hot tubs at all due to risk of overheating, dehydration and the chemicals they use. Surely checking that is basic childcare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 33
Sounds like Preston has bruises to his forehead almost constantly. Yes, babies of that age very occasionally bang their heads hard enough to bruise, but the sight of Preston with new bruises appearing on his head all the time should have rang alarm bells. JV’s mother saw him a lot - what on earth did she think?

Her comment at the hospital suggested she had fears that he was being mistreated.
And how many bumps/ bruises does a child of that age accumulate? Mostly they are playing in a comparatively protected environment - they may accidentally bump themselves on a cot bar or a table leg but most parents keep a close watch, move anything that could hurt them if they hit it, keep them off hard surfaces and away from sharp objects etc.

Preston had FORTY BRUISES on his head alone. Including behind his ear - that isn't an "easily knocked" place. I don't even want to think what these f*ckers have been doing to him.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 24
I got really upset this morning driving to work just thinking about how scared he must have been and not being able to get away ☹ they’re just utter monsters the pair of them
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 23
I can't remember my daughter having more than the odd bruise at that age and the only ones on her head were from banging into other children/getting hit on the head at nursery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I feel like today is going to be bad for the both of them. How do they explain away bruising in the back of the throat that couldn't have occurred when he arrested.

JMF I was on the fence but if he stayed with JV after everything that happened, I cant see how he wouldnt know what had been going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
So the doctor who performed the post mortem has confirmed that the bruising could not have been caused by medical intervention. In order for bruising to develop, a person must have a pulse and sufficient blood pressure to allow blood to leak into the surrounding tissues.

When he arrived at hospital, he had no pulse. Although doctors were able to restore circulation briefly, she has stated it was not long enough for bruising to form.

I hope this helps reassure the jury that those bruises were caused at home and not at the hospital 😞
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Wow
Reactions: 42
I’ve also just had a thought that neither men have appeared emotional in court so far. Nor was JV emotional in police interviews, he was dismissive if anything. If I was innocent and being accused of these horrendous things I’d be devastated. I’d be devastated hearing all the injuries to my (adoptive) baby. They’re both very cold
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
The Pathogist is now on the stand. (Updates via M.E.N). Absolutely harrowing. Poor baby ❤
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Given the regularity of bruises I'm giving JVs mum the side eye too..... as a more mature woman I expected more of her & when she looks back on those dreadful 4 months she must have had concerns & did absolutely nothing! I hope it haunts her.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 29
The evidence is taking a nasty turn, with the pathologist saying Preston was likely gripped and slapped. 😡 Poor baby. The video released of him bouncing to Miss Rachel is heart breaking shows how little and innocent he was.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.