They do carry the same sentences. Occasionally there is a campaign to change the law in England so that SA with an object is called rape but the argument against it is that they carry the same sentence in recognition. It's not a lesser charge and both are equally distressing for the victim. I was SAd as a child by an older child/teen and that messed me up much more than a later "date rape".I think that may have been the case before 2003. It would be interesting to know if in reality sentencing reflects that they are of equal seriousness under the law.
I’ve been poor at putting distressing details behind spoilers, and this is a really upsetting case so I’ll be better going forward.
JV is charged with two counts of assault by penetration. This means the prosecution believe he used an object or body part other than his penis to penetrate Preston’s anus specifically. Each count alleges a distinct incident and each count requires a verdict from the jury. They believe one incident was on the day of his murder and the other I’m not sure about. They must have good reason to believe it happened more than once.
Unfortunately I took it to mean his head was being forced somewhere as naturally he would have tried to pull backI don't know how to do spoilers sorry but all the bruising to the forehead and then on the back of the head behind the ears, and then ultimately suffocation, says to me that baby was forcibly being held face down quite a lot, possibly to muffle screaming
The only reference I've seen to anything is on the first day of the trial it was reported they were sitting in the dock with an empty chair between them. I don't know if that was to imply they're not putting on a united front or not.I think the fact they stayed together as a couple for two years after Preston’s death through the house move and while the investigation was ongoing tells me everything I need to know about JFM’s guilt and complicitness.
Has it been confirmed if they are still together as a couple now?
Ohhhhh no the thoughtUnfortunately I took it to mean his head was being forced somewhere as naturally he would have tried to pull back
How can JMF hear the pathologist’s findings and say, oh they must be crap at their job, I believe my partner. JMF was not there when it happened so he had to choose who to believe and he chose the guy over the science. He’s either completely complicit or utterly deluded. Neither are good for him. As for JV - throw away the key.I didn't realise JMF and JV were still together 2 years after.......
I've changed my mind, he can **** off as well.
I was really hoping we would hear he had run for the hills, when the penny dropped.
What i noticed from the police interviews,
How did he get this bruise? No idea, dont know, haven't a clue etc.
Then, oh THAT bruise, I know ALL about that bruise, it was nothing to do with me, it was someone else. Well isnt that convenient you noncey fat fuck!!!
I’ve just listened to the podcast and here’s a summary for anyone who might be interested. I have not spoilered it so please be mindful if you don’t want to see specifics.New DM podcast released a few hours ago. https://www.archive.is/oldest/https...b901380164&episodeId=6a0360f85c981a357372e633
You're right - the Behaviour Panel have made similar observations. I think they call it "leakage" - where someone denies something, but their body can't go along with their speech and reveals the truth despite themselves.I’ve noticed quite often when JV answers ‘no’ he nods when he says it. I’m sure it’s not foolproof but I think a lot of body language people say this can be a sign of lying. He does it on that latest video with the blonde hair ‘did you cause that bruise’ he replies ‘no’ but nods. He does it a couple of times I’ve noticed it on some of the other videos too.
I think @nothinonyou is right - it's to avoid being recognised. Same with the weight loss.Something about him sets my teeth on edge. I can’t stomach seeing or listening to him, he’s so awful. The smarmy arrogance and bad attitude radiating off him here!! All this going on and he’s made time for a bleach and tone in between. That is me being petty and picking holes in the fat grub I’m sure, but even that has made me think he’s a total self-absorbed wrongen - who would bother when they’ve got, ya know, a rape and murder charge against a baby going on.
He must have been so desperate for protection and affection. - and he had no reason to fear women. He was probably instinctively hoping to charm her, so she would take him home and keep him safe.Preston was with them for 4 months.
I had a look back through 4 months of photos on my phone to get a sense of the time period and it’s desperately short, it’s nothing, and yet for Preston it must have been hell on earth. The fact he could still show joy bouncing on JV’s mum’s knee the day of his alleged murder breaks my heart.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?