Evidentially, she wouldn’t provide anything for either the defence or the prosecution. They will have taken statements off her during the investigation but I imagine these formed part of the non-disclosable evidence in the trial. It could have been a legal argument that resulted in her not being called as a witness. Effectively, using JV’s and JMF’s accounts, they didn’t need mum to be a w
It’s been said a few times but some of the bruising to his body was only visible after death.
I personally think she had suspicions of them being bad parents but no suspicions of SA and likely took what her son told her to account for the injuries and the hospital visits.
She had him on Wednesdays (if I remember correctly) but timing wise I think the SAs were done when she wasn’t going to see him. Plus, they caused seizures so any “off” behaviour JV and JMF would put down to that.
It’s easy in hindsight to think she should have known. Same with the info coming out about his upbringing/her relationships, I don’t agree that this was something that should have flagged in a background check or could have foreseen this happening.
For me the blame lays with JV and JMF, but if you want to look at others, then I would say medical staff and social services for not joining the dots and being “professionally curious”, I would then place his mum after them, then the school/colleagues. A number of people let Preston down. His foster mother tried to raise concerns and was shut down.