Ok I'm serial commenting now, but one last thing and ill shut it. Don't know how to do trigger warnings, so warning.
The blue tongue cot photos are the smoking gun to me. There's no debate. They both saw it and both knew that could kill him. My 9 year old would know that, so would the dogs on the street, so would my goldfish. There's no convincing me or surely anyone that they DiDnT kNoW. I think I've spent so long reading about this case and the small nitty gritty and thinking on the smaller subtle evidence. But if you found a random phone on the street unlocked and that photo was open on the screen, you'd ring the police and stop at nothing until the baby with the blue tongue being strangled on a cot bar was found and saved. The second smoking gun is him recording Preston moving towards his penis with an open mouth. Same thing if you found a video like that on a phone, you'd frantically want to find and save the baby, because theres not a situation that exists where thatd be recorded innocently and the penis owner wouldn't know that it was full sexual predator behaviour. Think about every man you know. Do you know one man who would record a video like that with a baby naked in a bath and youd think it was innocent? Case closed for me with those two cold hard visually evidenced facts