Preston Davey Trial #3

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
To be honest I don’t think she’s the full shilling. The father is also scummy. His Facebook timeline is full of racist memes and Tommy Robinson tit.
A murderer and a racist as birth parents- the time he had with the foster family was the only semblance of normality for him. It’s suggested he was going to be the foster family’s last baby. I wonder if they’ve taken in any older children since? What an awful ending to a fostering journey if not.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 30
She's definitely not the full shilling. Google her name and you'll see what she's done. Lily Lilley's family will tell you that.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 11
This is a bit strange… he was only a baby, can’t imagine anyone telling a baby to be quiet.
He is definitely sticking by him which makes me more inclined to believe they are both as guilty as each other.

'I remember we had gone into a cafe in Fleetwood and he was being happy and giggly and laughing and some people made a comment ‘you need to make that child be quiet’.

‘Jamie stood up for him, he said ‘he’s happy and giggling, please don’t speak to him that way’. He’d never allow anyone to disrespect him.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Angry
Reactions: 24
This is a bit strange… he was only a baby, can’t imagine anyone telling a baby to be quiet.
He is definitely sticking by him which makes me more inclined to believe they are both as guilty as each other.

'I remember we had gone into a cafe in Fleetwood and he was being happy and giggly and laughing and some people made a comment ‘you need to make that child be quiet’.

‘Jamie stood up for him, he said ‘he’s happy and giggling, please don’t speak to him that way’. He’d never allow anyone to disrespect him.
Yes I thought this, just making stuff up to seem like good parents with no proof that that happened. It’s not as if he was seven and running around creating havoc
 
  • Like
Reactions: 33
I think he’s painting a rosey image of JV because he has to maintain the lie that he’d never have suspected anything and was completely in the dark. If he says there were signs, he needs to answer for why he did nothing - hence him acting all upset that no one told him JV was having dark thoughts
 
  • Like
Reactions: 46
This is a bit strange… he was only a baby, can’t imagine anyone telling a baby to be quiet.
He is definitely sticking by him which makes me more inclined to believe they are both as guilty as each other.

'I remember we had gone into a cafe in Fleetwood and he was being happy and giggly and laughing and some people made a comment ‘you need to make that child be quiet’.

‘Jamie stood up for him, he said ‘he’s happy and giggling, please don’t speak to him that way’. He’d never allow anyone to disrespect him.
It’s the most bizarre, false sounding thing I’ve read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 34
“Mr McGowan-Fazakerley is being shown a photo of Preston in the bath. He says he doesn’t remember that particular bath but he recalls the photo as he had it as a screensaver on his phone.”
As I have said previously, I’m not a parent but I cannot imagine choose a photo of my child in the bath as my screensaver…you know, something that other people would see on a regular basis.
The fact he chose a bath photo as his screensaver is a nail in the coffin for me - he wanted to relive the abuse every time he looked at his phone the sick duck
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 30
JMF is painting JV in a good light for one reason. If at any point he said that he thinks JV could pose a risk to Preston, he’ll be found guilty for allowing cruelty / death to a child. He has to say that he couldn’t foresee anything happening to cover his own back. He’s hoping to get off on all charges here.
I expect the jury will see through this though as it completely contradicts with the fact he’s STILL in a relationship with JV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44
A murderer and a racist as birth parents- the time he had with the foster family was the only semblance of normality for him. It’s suggested he was going to be the foster family’s last baby. I wonder if they’ve taken in any older children since? What an awful ending to a fostering journey if not.
It wouldn't surprise me if this has destroyed fostering for them altogether. I'd been wondering about this earlier - whether they'd ever again feel comfortable and confident about parting with a pre-verbal child, or if they'd worry themselves sick wondering if the same might happen again.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 18
JMF is painting JV in a good light for one reason. If at any point he said that he thinks JV could pose a risk to Preston, he’ll be found guilty for allowing cruelty / death to a child. He has to say that he couldn’t foresee anything happening to cover his own back. He’s hoping to get off on all charges here
Absolutely. He’s going to have to stay dug in now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
This is a bit strange… he was only a baby, can’t imagine anyone telling a baby to be quiet.
He is definitely sticking by him which makes me more inclined to believe they are both as guilty as each other.

'I remember we had gone into a cafe in Fleetwood and he was being happy and giggly and laughing and some people made a comment ‘you need to make that child be quiet’.

‘Jamie stood up for him, he said ‘he’s happy and giggling, please don’t speak to him that way’. He’d never allow anyone to disrespect him.
Happy, giggling children don't tend to get complaints - especially in cafes which are family places. It's older children who are allowed to misbehave (running up and down screaming - that sort of thing). On the whole people are very tolerant even of crying babies, because they know that it's just what babies do.

He's lying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44
I think he’s painting a rosey image of JV because he has to maintain the lie that he’d never have suspected anything and was completely in the dark. If he says there were signs, he needs to answer for why he did nothing - hence him acting all upset that no one told him JV was having dark thoughts
Yes you’re right and I think it’s sounding too OTT to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20
This is a bit strange… he was only a baby, can’t imagine anyone telling a baby to be quiet.
He is definitely sticking by him which makes me more inclined to believe they are both as guilty as each other.

'I remember we had gone into a cafe in Fleetwood and he was being happy and giggly and laughing and some people made a comment ‘you need to make that child be quiet’.

‘Jamie stood up for him, he said ‘he’s happy and giggling, please don’t speak to him that way’. He’d never allow anyone to disrespect him.
Have they removed this now, I can’t see it at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
the birth mums TikTok is sickening to be honest. Showing off big Preston tattoos and talking about justice for him but he was in care because of her failures!! I feel for her a little, she carried him and birthed him but it feels like she’s posting for attention. One minute it’s justice for Preston and the next talking about her sexy other half and her acrylic nails!!

Also saw Preston had 2 middle names and neither were Elijah.
Absolutely!!!!! Thought exactly the same. What were the middle names i missed tht bit
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
‘I did everything a parent would do in terms of his care. There was nothing Jamie prevented me from doing. The only one aspect of his life Jamie controlled was his clothes.’

Odd thing to state that the only thing Jamie controlled was his clothes - why did he control his clothes?

‘I have never seen Jamie or anyone to that matter hit, punch, kick, poke, smack or bite my son and if I thought that Jamie or anybody for that matter, who had a degree of responsibility for his care did any of those things I would have done something about it I would have picked him up and removed him from that house.’

I hope the prosecution pick him up on this, and why - if this is how he feels/felt - he's still with JV after all the allegations & evidence have been shown to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
I jink it's worth bearing in mind that we don't know if she has any additional needs. Sometimes people's behaviour can look really inappropriate but they may not have the understanding to know that it is. O found her videos distasteful but I also got the impression there may have been other stuff going on for her.
As a mother of a sen child this is very offensive!!!!!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 8
So JV says he didn't do it, JMF is saying he didn't do it, JV didn't do it, as the pathologists have agreed on non accidental arm break, and SA being the cause of his injuries, who are they going to say did it. Their defence makes no sense to me.
And that's before you consider the pics and videos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
I did feel sorry for prestons mum until I seen her tick tock showing off her fancy nails, sorry but the trial is live i am sure i would be going to get my nails done, each to their own but come on!

JMF coming across all nicey nice !! 🤢🤮
I thought the same!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.