His interview was excellent and he raised 17 points where Meghan had not told the truth, and explained his reasons. I'm glad he went on air and explained things as in many ways they were very necessary.There are 6 articles on the Daily Fail today from his interview on fox or an article he wrote on Megan! Get over her ffs!
Perhaps they've been listening to price's advice re labelling everything they don't agree with as 'Trolling'?They've branded those sceptical as trolls without giving any evidence of actual troll-like comments. I think its a valid question to ask if his family carting him off to Barbados at the grand old age of 100, not to mention the pandemic, was in his best interests (or the best interests of all the people who they could've infected). What if somebody asymptomatic passed on Covid to him in the airport and he became seriously ill while out there? If the trip wasn't sponsored, would they have put their hands in their own pocket to take him to Barbados? I don't think as a family, they're strapped for cash. He raised an astounding amount for charity out of the kindness of his own heart and his family saw this as a cash grab for themselves and I don't think raising questions about their intentions is trolling in the slightest. If Piers is aloud to hold people accountable for behaviour he doesn't agree with, and he does so with much greater force than anyone has done with Sir Tom, why is it trolling in this case? I think its a cheap shot for the article to brand this as trolling when it quite clearly isn't. I hope Sir Tom was happy and in as little pain as possible in his final weeks.
But is six articles necessary? I'm not Megan's biggest fan but even I can see that he and the daily mail have a weird vendetta against herHis interview was excellent and he raised 17 points where Meghan had not told the truth, and explained his reasons. I'm glad he went on air and explained things as in many ways they were very necessary.
I think I’d have a bit of a vendetta against her if she’d sued me (ANL) and then allowed doctored ‘racist’ headlines to be used...But is six articles necessary? I'm not Megan's biggest fan but even I can see that he and the daily mail have a weird vendetta against her
They're a newspaper they're meant to at least look impartial and if I remember correctly this is the same newspaper who published a private letter she wrote which she successfully sued them for and the same paper who hassled her family, especially her father who by all accounts is vulnerable.I think I’d have a bit of a vendetta against her if she’d sued me (ANL) and then allowed doctored ‘racist’ headlines to be used...
The same father whom provided them with the letter to print?They're a newspaper they're meant to at least look impartial and if I remember correctly this is the same newspaper who published a private letter she wrote which she successfully sued them for and the same paper who hassled her family, especially her father who by all accounts is vulnerable.
If by "providing" you mean she sent him a letter and he sold it then okay. If you want to hate on Megan there's a thread on here to go to but based on your picture, I'm sure you already know about itThe same father whom provided them with the letter to print?
Correct.If you want to hate on Megan there's a thread on here to go to but based on your picture, I'm sure you already know about it
Morgan's vendetta against Meghan Markle began long before that and simply echoes his vendetta against Madonna for similar reasons.I think I’d have a bit of a vendetta against her if she’d sued me (ANL) and then allowed doctored ‘racist’ headlines to be used...
@Moth I was referring to this comment about the Mail having 6 articles, not about Piers having a vendetta.There are 6 articles on the Daily Fail today from his interview on fox or an article he wrote on Megan! Get over her ffs!
I know Piers is pissed off about being used and dumped when he outlived his usefulness, as she didn't need publicity from him. But he's using it to show he's just one of a long list of people she has Markled and will probably continue to do so.Morgan's vendetta against Meghan Markle began long before that and simply echoes his vendetta against Madonna for similar reasons.
I also see he had another pop at Alex Beresford in the interview. Morgan claims that Beresford sent him a private message about his comments on Meghan Markle and Morgan invited him onto GMB to 'discuss' them. Looks like he underestimated Beresford, presumably he though the could bully him too but it didn't work hence the drama queen walk off.
Actually, he didn’t “sell” it. He took no money at all.If by "providing" you mean she sent him a letter and he sold it then okay. If you want to hate on Megan there's a thread on here to go to but based on your picture, I'm sure you already know about it
Morgan's vendetta against Meghan Markle began long before that and simply echoes his vendetta against Madonna for similar reasons.
I also see he had another pop at Alex Beresford in the interview. Morgan claims that Beresford sent him a private message about his comments on Meghan Markle and Morgan invited him onto GMB to 'discuss' them. Looks like he underestimated Beresford, presumably he though the could bully him too but it didn't work hence the drama queen walk off.
Did you watch the GMB segment. I did.Morgan's vendetta against Meghan Markle began long before that and simply echoes his vendetta against Madonna for similar reasons.
I also see he had another pop at Alex Beresford in the interview. Morgan claims that Beresford sent him a private message about his comments on Meghan Markle and Morgan invited him onto GMB to 'discuss' them. Looks like he underestimated Beresford, presumably he though the could bully him too but it didn't work hence the drama queen walk off.
He did right blocking him and anyone else incapable of having an adult grown up conversation of different views without getting personal if you cannot take someone agreeing with you. I don't know how anyone can be OK with freedom of speech being eroded away and Meghan not being called out over her lies and stretching of the truth.Another day of Piersey the Gammon being able to give it but not being able to take it
It works both ways - you could argue that Piers went personal first saying about Kevin not being a class act or whatever (I don’t know who Kevin is, just find it funny whenever someone replies to Piers he can’t take it)He did right blocking him and anyone else incapable of having an adult grown up conversation of different views without getting personal if you cannot take someone agreeing with you. I don't know how anyone can be OK with freedom of speech being eroded away and Meghan not being called out over her lies and stretching of the truth.
Well he's been so ambiguous about the whole thing until now. Really held his cards close to his chest.Thank GOD Pierced Organ has had the opportunity to tell us his thoughts AGAIN about Meghan Markle.
Is that the opinion that he's 'not allowed to have'?Thank GOD Pierced Organ has had the opportunity to tell us his thoughts AGAIN about Meghan Markle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?