I don’t know anything about law at all, but could it possibly mean that the minor (if named, therefore searchable) might show a link to PS and not just TS - other than a familial link, I mean. A professional link perhaps.
When a person is not named in Court Proceedings it is for one of the following reasons…. (it usually says at the top of the Court papers which one as the Judge has to justify his reasoning, unless it is a child which for most cases anonymity is automatically granted)
1.
When the defendant or claimant is a minor
2. The Sexual Offences Act 1992 implements an automatic prohibition to publish details that identify a victim or their where abouts.
3. Adults are granted anonymity if the Judge is worried about the safety of the person who has convicted alleged crimes (because if they were named this could cause people to abuse their families or when back out in the real word, the names person could be subject to harm from the members of the public which the court don’t want to be liable for)
So basically, whoever it is that Pedaphils Brother abused, it is clearly a minor in my opinion given the crimes he was convicted of. It could possibly be an adult as in SA cases, the victim is not named for obvious reasons such as not wanting anyone to know what happened to them.
If there was a Court case regarding PS and MM it’s unlikely that either of them will be named, stupidly because of Phil playing the mental health card already and MM being classed by everyone as a vulnerable boy.
Also, where did you guys find the Court case for Phil’s brother? I haven’t managed to find the actual papers only what news outlets have said. It will be somewhere because they all get published.