& What's the worse that can happen to MM? The poor guy probably has no money left or very little, from the settlement they can't take from him what he doesn't have.If ITV did pay him off does that mean he won't be able to give his side of the story? Is that legally binding?
I can't keep up with them , if I'd have known I would have booked some leave.Jack Monroe threads move at a pace when she's having a chaos.
When was this, what did he say?
the expressions on Philth's face were not genuine - it was one big actRuth looked so uncomfortable too
with the SM backlash against those reporting, it's not really surprising sadlyI am still surprised more people haven't publicly come forward so far. There is normally when these things make the MSM. I cannot believe this is a one off.
Some good people need to get the lad in rehab. There's a reason he was at theatre school for vulnerable kids to start with and that hasnt been dealt with, just used and abused by Philth. MM can get through this with the right support. He can still be a bloody star if he wants in my opinion.A quick update on the scenario of MM leaving the pub. Today I was talking to 2 younger colleagues. The first impression they both had was that he left because of press intrusion.
When I asked about the drug use one informed me that he was on his final warning over it
from, I think,the area manager of the brewery. I'm of the assumption that they both tie in, I think the pressure of the situation was leading him to turn to an escape route more frequently, the press just happened to have found him around the same time.
I asked about his inappropriate behaviour, one said he could be a bit of a nuisance with some at times ( in fact he sent one of my younger colleagues a text) . I must stress that they didn't seem to see him as a sex pest more in the line of someone who was needy.
He was apparently at someone's house one night and they couldn't get rid, but I think it was more in the line of wanting company than anything of a predatory nature.
Again these people liked him, they knew when he arrived at the pub his history.
A good few of the locals tried to question him about it but he never gave any details.
One mentioned an injunction , but probably because they had read about it.
I said some time ago that another colleague was told ITV were paying £ 4000 a month for an extended period of time, this colleague did stress that the story was told to them 3rd hand. I did think at the time ITV paying him off was feasible, the amounts could have got exaggerated each time the tale was told. It breaks my heart to think this lad has had his life shattered in more ways than one. He was making a success of the pub/ restaurant, I have a feeling it started to go downhill more quickly once Tim S was found guilty. I think that's when the lid came off that bulging tin of worms.
Katie, if you’re reading here can you try to get a slot on GBNews in the next few days and tell them about how Holly likes to snort lines of cocaine from the gusset of Fearne Cotton’s knickersIf it turns out Katie Hopkins is on here I would lose my absolute shit and go all fangirl🫶 https://giphy.com/1T5f11upvLKJ77Lj6j
You left off the holiday segment- about taking a cruise up de-nial!Just in tomorrows schedule for This Morning....
-News paper reviews (the ones that dont feature TM)
-Interview with a woman who claims to work in the happiest work place in the Uk
-segment on how to feng shui your home to keep all the positive vibes flowing
- cooking half term special- how to elevate smiley faces for your kids
-how to wear bright colours for summer
-and Pharrell Williams performs HAPPY
Keep smiling everyone
This is really sad if true. It sounds as if he got big into drugs at some point.A quick update on the scenario of MM leaving the pub. Today I was talking to 2 younger colleagues. The first impression they both had was that he left because of press intrusion.
When I asked about the drug use one informed me that he was on his final warning over it
from, I think,the area manager of the brewery. I'm of the assumption that they both tie in, I think the pressure of the situation was leading him to turn to an escape route more frequently, the press just happened to have found him around the same time.
I asked about his inappropriate behaviour, one said he could be a bit of a nuisance with some at times ( in fact he sent one of my younger colleagues a text) . I must stress that they didn't seem to see him as a sex pest more in the line of someone who was needy.
He was apparently at someone's house one night and they couldn't get rid, but I think it was more in the line of wanting company than anything of a predatory nature.
Again these people liked him, they knew when he arrived at the pub his history.
A good few of the locals tried to question him about it but he never gave any details.
One mentioned an injunction , but probably because they had read about it.
I said some time ago that another colleague was told ITV were paying £ 4000 a month for an extended period of time, this colleague did stress that the story was told to them 3rd hand. I did think at the time ITV paying him off was feasible, the amounts could have got exaggerated each time the tale was told. It breaks my heart to think this lad has had his life shattered in more ways than one. He was making a success of the pub/ restaurant, I have a feeling it started to go downhill more quickly once Tim S was found guilty. I think that's when the lid came off that bulging tin of worms.
obsessivelocust?He posted under the nickname 'Angry Locust', and said that everyones husbands were sexually attracted to underage children and we all knew it deep down. Something about it being a human instinct. Then kept quoting posters on his Twitter! It was insane. Does anyone else remember?
My point exactly!Surely NDAs can be null and void if it’s to cover up a crime
Parliamentary TV will get blown out of the water, you can watch episodes of the muppets on YouTube at anytime !Wonder who will win the 10am ratings war on Tuesday, itv or parliamentary tv???
I remember, same profile pic on here and twitter of a locust?the expressions on Philth's face were not genuine - it was one big act
Possibly. Definitely locust thoughobsessivelocust?
Should get Alison and Dermott to present it, 10.30am.They want it televised:
“ITV executives are set to face a televised probe from MPs over what they knew and when about the Phillip Schofield This Morning affair”
ITV bosses set to face grilling by MPs over Phillip Schofield This Morning scandal
ITV executives are set to face a televised probe from MPs over what they knew and when about the Phillip Schofield This Morning affairinews.co.uk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?