But those online rumours we've been posting about and been hushed up everywhere is now in the public eye!! This is great news!!Kinda disappointed. Woke up this morning expecting a full on splash, top of the Mail kind of story. This story is just repeating the online rumours.
I agree. I think the reason we’re getting excited on this thread about the recent article referencing his relationship with a runner is because we actually know who the papers are referring to, whereas a sheeple who’s not really invested in the downfall of PS will view this article and liken it to a witch-hunt, considering on paper, trying to discredit Phil by bringing up a fallout he had with a former runner on the show, does sound like a bit of a reach. Sadly, I think the publishing of this recent article may worked in Phil’s favour. I don’t think he’ll ever truly have a downfall until the true story is actually published and not some sanitised cryptic article that could easily be misconstrued as bullying and harassment by simpletons.How much do we think something like Tattle represents public opinion? Unfortunately not a lot I would suggest. Most of us are here because we already have a view of someone over a period of time, in this case a very poor view of PS for very valid reasons. General public are like sheep, just look at the coronation, celebs in general, they get a bit of bad press but if the media stops that or even prints some good stories, general public fall in line. Just look at Saville, didn't take much digging to know of his dodgyness, same with Kitty and others, excellent articles and videos out there. My missus gives out to me at times for being cynical and not liking anyone lol. Me watching TV "don't like them" blah blah.
It will take a concrete story to take this man down, otherwise he'll be back on TV smugly presenting with two fingers up to all those not kissing his arse.
Exactly this. I think ITV now want him out and they're pushing this poor Holly narrative. The public won't take to it.Holly thinking she’s in charge now at ITV and can tell them to get rid of Schofe - I hope to god it backfired & they get rid of them BOTH!!
Be quite funny if it was The SchofeSo as much as the entire Philth situation is shaking me to the very core. The thing that is baffling me and shocking me in equal measure this weekend is who the hell is banging Hollyfillas husband
Oh god please not Rochelle but the again.... anyone but PhyllisRochelle & Alison
Exactly! See my post belowOn gb news they just showed all the front pages. Hardly any PS, just a little pic, not the screaming headlines we were hoping for
Yes the top comment on a DM article last night was saying how awful Holly is for treating Philth like this and how he can’t be judged because of his brother. Sadly most of the general public are clueless.Sadly, I think Holly is going to look like the bad one to those people that don’t know the whole story.
Also, depending on how far down the rabbit hole you wish to go…. It’s interesting the Kate did the piano stunt at short notice and that has basically took over along with the Eurovision et el. Nothing is as it seems. If Phil is as bad as we think, then like Saville, it will go deep. Same as SDA, Kitty, such a sad world we live in.
Just wait for Dan Wootton tomorrow. He'll definitely be on the case againExactly! See my post belowthat’s it for me because GB News have led this all week and now nothing. It’s a nasty world. They wouldn’t have Camilla T slating her itv colleague and a royal reporter too. She too knows a lot!
So were mineMy measured questions in the DM comments are being deleted.
I just posted a comment on that article and I can see it sitting there. I can see it says other people are typing comments but I can’t see them. So it looks like mine is the only comment leftYep, people have been typing for the last 10 minutes yet nothing published!View attachment 2168724
ObviouslyI'm guessing NDA's details are kept secret for a reason! Someone I once knew had NDA about an X Factor host they slept with but wouldn't reveal any details whatsoever however much I asked, so very annoying
And the super injunction won't be appearing in Court lists I guess. So who really knows
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?