How did she avoid SS? Even if she was being treated privately it should have been flagged. Strange how she was on the cover of baby magazines with all that going on in the background.
thats what I find so strange about the situation. She’d been taking heroin apparently for years so was Tom? Seeing a baby born addicted is truly one of the most awful things you can witness.Yet a normal person that didn’t grow up in privilege would have had Social services ponce right on them, there really is no hiding drug addiction when your baby is born an addict
Because if bobs money and influence, having a druggy for a daughter would be seen as bad for bobs image! I can’t stand Bob Geldof, he is another prat that preaches shit but doesn’t do it himself. He knew full well what peaches was up to, but did fuck all to help. How the fuck do you think a unemployed druggie and an part time Musician paid for a mansion in the middle of the kent countryside, benefits wouldn’t pay it!!!!How did she avoid SS? Even if she was being treated privately it should have been flagged. Strange how she was on the cover of baby magazines with all that going on in the background.
Social services would have known for sure they will have done their checks. If tom wasn’t on drugs that will be why they didn’t appear to be involved but for all we know they very well could have been. Addicts are the best liars.How did she avoid SS? Even if she was being treated privately it should have been flagged. Strange how she was on the cover of baby magazines with all that going on in the background.
How do you know she was on the phone to her dealer?These photos alway make me sad and anger, how does one flip a pram and then just carry on chatting away on the phone “to the dealer.” And this ladies and gentleman is why she was a shit mother, if she does this sort of shit out and about what did she do behind close doors. Tom and Bob can try to paint her as an earthly god mother all they want, but she was a druggie that failed her children massively. She clearly didn’t think having a kids throughView attachment 1031848View attachment 1031849View attachment 1031850
I had that exact pram and the stupid woman hadn’t strapped him into the car seat. You can see he’s laid over a blanket that covers the straps. If he’d been strapped in he would have been completely unharmed. How she also managed to tip the whole thing over I’ll never know.These photos alway make me sad and anger, how does one flip a pram and then just carry on chatting away on the phone “to the dealer.” And this ladies and gentleman is why she was a shit mother, if she does this sort of shit out and about what did she do behind close doors. Tom and Bob can try to paint her as an earthly god mother all they want, but she was a druggie that failed her children massively. She clearly didn’t think having a kids throughView attachment 1031848View attachment 1031849View attachment 1031850
When I originally saw those photos, I thought to myself there is something crazy going on behind the scenes, she looked ill even thereI had that exact pram and the stupid woman hadn’t strapped him into the car seat. You can see he’s laid over a blanket that covers the straps. If he’d been strapped in he would have been completely unharmed. How she also managed to tip the whole thing over I’ll never know.
You’ve also got to love the way she’s still got the phone clamped to her ear as she’s picking the baby up off the floor.
Wait, how do you know that her baby was being weaned off heroin and methadone?Peaches did a photo shoot for ‘hello’ preaching about attachment parenting and painting herself as mum of the year, all whilst her child was in the hospital being weaned off heroin and methodone.
That ain’t decent.
I think earlier in this thread or the first one that was confirmed. But its been ages since I've read it. It might have come from the inquest.Wait, how do you know that her baby was being weaned off heroin and methadone?
She looked awful. Considering the baby looks really young - less than 12 weeks, I’d guess, although probably more like 8 - it didn’t make sense that she was so thin and gaunt. I thought she had anorexia but now we know what was really going on.When I originally saw those photos, I thought to myself there is something crazy going on behind the scenes, she looked ill even there
I remember rumours at the time that she was still on heroin.She looked awful. Considering the baby looks really young - less than 12 weeks, I’d guess, although probably more like 8 - it didn’t make sense that she was so thin and gaunt. I thought she had anorexia but now we know what was really going on.
Yep this also bothered me at the inquest... He knew she was back on drugs recently (he said he found drugs in the house and made her flush them down the toilet in Feb, she died in April) yet he left her with the baby overnight. I know drug addicts can be convincing liars but surely he'd see more telltale signs that she was back on it again just before she died? Unless they were living apart secretly (I don't think they were, but I did wonder this with him staying at his parents and his dad dropping one of the babies back at the house, was there some arrangement).So she was addicted for three years according to the inquest. Had Phaedra on 24 April 2013 (c-section arranged to fall on Paula’s birthday), tested clean in the November (according to the husband), was found using again the February, and overdosed 6-7 April 2014.
What the police found at the home:
* 34 medical syringes - some with needles, some without. Some contained traces of brown residue
* One capped syringe was in a cardboard sweet box
* 45 packaged and sealed syringes, alcohol wipes and cotton buds
* Three pairs of black knotted tights
* A burnt spoon under the bed, and other burnt spoons throughout the house
* A quantity of brown powder hidden inside a cupboard over a bedroom door
* The brown powder was found to be 6.91g of heroin with a purity of 61%, making it 'importation quality' and worth between £350 and £550
So the husband was living under a rock or…?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?