Part Time Working Mummy #11

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yeah I think we should just agree to ignore her. She seems a confused woman, cba with that shit lol.
 
Reactions: 17
They only stay on stories for 24 hours. It may just have expired and gone
 
Reactions: 2
Could it just have timed out? They only stay live on stories for 24 hours.
 
Reactions: 1
Isn't it strange that it's gone? I'm guessing she's had a telling off for the massive safeguarding issue she potentially has caused.
Big virtual hug to you big mama. If ever you need a chat feel free to message me. I'm no expert but like to think i offer an ear to anyone needing to talk. Xx

Could it just have timed out? They only stay live on stories for 24 hours.
Yeah true could be this. Good job too after thst fuck up.
 
Reactions: 4
I couldn't read the 'article' I was bored after one sentence.... what is clear though is that she just wants traffic to her website so she can cash in!

The best thing you can do is stop giving her the time of day and not even bother reading it
 
Reactions: 12
All as bad and sad as each other, all trying to get attention in what ever way they can all so very sad.

All I can think is that people like this have deep rooted problems, they live for the attention the bickering, and somehow get off on it.

Ladies put your bloody phones down, uninstall Instagram and start looking after your families and get a life.

What a mixed up generation,
 
Reactions: 14
It's grotesque isn't it? The materialistic greediness is hmm vile&horrific. I think the reason she kicked B out to sleep in the shed was more so she has a showroom for all her stuff gifted or bought with our money. It's sad but as somone said before the baby is really just pay cheque number 6.
 
Reactions: 9
Yes I think she must have, I can't see it.?
 
Reactions: 1
Alleluia. Been lurking for a looooonnnng time and the reason I haven't signed up before is because of suspicion over that very incident as well as other things.

Also I remember reading that Keels case load was handed over to @Empen or @Querty in the light of her harassment claims. Perhaps Empen will come here and shed any light on to why the journalist has now turned her back on the site that originally supported her?
 
Reactions: 19
Anyone else find keels dubious from the start? I didn’t interact with her because something didn’t sit right with me
 
Reactions: 22
Anyone else find keels dubious from the start? I didn’t interact with her because something didn’t sit right with me
She was pretty much gone by the time I started posting so didn't really interact either. But again found it odd she left
 
Reactions: 2
Not gonna give Keels the satisfaction of reading the article. She can bore off.
What an earth even possessed Rachaelelele to post that story about the refuge vacancies?
Even if has some details crossed out, what is really worrying is agencies trust her enough to give her these details. How do they know it’s definitely Rachaelelelele’s email address? Is she DBS checked? And actually trained in safeguarding and domestic abuse? Scary that women actually trust her to help them. There are trained support workers out there to help people and keep them safe.
 
Reactions: 14
It looked to me like just a generic email sent to someone asking for information. Any one of us could probably google a relevant email address and invent a “friend” and give them a back story. In fact, from memory, the only information she was actually given in that email was a phone number that’s readily available online?
 
Reactions: 3
Having said that, despite her coming across as a total hypocrite, she has made some valid points about anonyminity on this thread.

One off the things that would have me continually banging my head against the wall was the blind faith of posters taken towards anonymous people who accepted all the crude and salacious tales from supposedly family members, half sisters and ex partners. How on earth and why do you trust these people.

I totally agree with her point about members saying they are in the Police force. That was when it got totally out of hand.

That aside, I'm curious as to why she's taken this lead now..to disassociate with this site. Could there be legal action being taken against her? Just throwing it out there.

Never trust a journalist. Ye olde saying.
 
Reactions: 11
We only have her word that she’s a journalist.
 
Reactions: 2
Moderators have seen proof to identify some of us as who/what we say we are. Yes, it’s anonymous and safe here but there’s no reason to automatically doubt everyone who claims to know Rachel or work in a powerful profession. There are thousands of us here, stands to reason there will be social workers, lawyers, teachers, police officers etc.
 
Reactions: 9
Perhaps keels needs her own thread so that we can keep asking Rachel where the money is on this one?
 
Reactions: 12
Never trust a stranger online, or what they say, however authoritative they may sound, ever.

When I was a Mumsnetter ; the posters asking for medical advice and then someone would reply “ Hi, I’m a GP” Are you , really ?
 
Reactions: 8
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.