No, he wasn't spreading "MiSinFoRmaTiOn" he was speaking out against big pharma and governments who are desperately covering up real facts and data about this vaccine. The whole point of science is to question the science. To listen to other experts in the field. What is happening right now regarding censorship is extremely dangerous. He should not be vilified for declining this vaccine and also for sharing factual information. When you cut out a mans tongue, you are not proving him to be a liar but instead showing the world you fear what he might say. We can all make our own decisions on this and if the multibillion pound marketing campaign and media bullying hasn't made people have the jab then perhaps just respect their choices.I find it funny out of all the things I’ve mentioned that’s what you chose to pick out and dissect. And I didn’t name call him. I called him antivaxx because he has openly spread misinformation about the vaccine, which is the dangerous territory.
I’m aware of him having the vaccine it’s the nonsense he was spreading to his large amount of followers after which was dangerous. He could’ve chosen to not have it and just kept his mouth shut.
I don’t care whether he does or doesn’t have it but wilfully spreading misinformation the way he was doing was disgusting.
Either way, he has bigger issues than that and the fact I very briefly mentioned he’s antivaxx and that’s getting picked apart is bleeping weird. Let’s just agree to disagree. It is tattle after all.