Lee is for life, not just for New Years contentOff topic but I predict a dog in the new year
??I can only apologise for my graphic content.
As a poster, I try and go above and beyond in my efforts to please, sometimes I make a boob.
Sometimes... nearly a dick ?
So once again, thank you and i am delighted you have all shared your thoughts with me.
Ooh. (Represented by scammel ma!)
Especially when it's viewers and followers telling her and her husband. I got blocked for pointing out that if it is gifted then it now needs to be declared under ASA rules. Also, pointed it out to them when they were gifted the Scottish hotel weekend. It's very clearIf I find something confusing at work of vague, I Would go out my way to learn it to understand it inside out! Poor excuse
To live in the utility room maybe?Off topic but I predict a dog in the new year
???????????Meldrum comments section.
46 comments. Refresh
41 comments.
Oh lee you little belter... is this you right now.
??View attachment 1763
Which is why she tries to hide they are #ads #gifted if she can. Great timing though as hopefully more sheep will see she is just a marketing tool. She has to be now that Meld is out of work and they have that big house to pay for.Another AD indeed. It seems like that’s all her channel is nowadays. She’s had 9 pictures on her Instagram only in the past week advertising something. She is ruining her channel, all of these ads might pay off short term but her channel is going down the drain long term - think about that mrs meldrum.
Joined here purely out of frustration regarding Mrs M and her ‘sorry, not sorry’, poor apology today.
Like others have said, I feel she definitely went out of her way to mislead. I can’t believe that people are defending her.
Mrs M posts to a ‘business’ page and as such, should be held accountable for their business actions. If they have broken the law or deliberately mislead then they should and must be held accountable.
Also, there is a definite and clear difference between a troll and someone who is politely asking for clarification. Some of the comments by the ? on insta make me so cross!
View attachment 1766
#justeatAD #Kathkissesmyass #proseccoboobdrum
You asked where he was and he delivered for you @Oohthedrama
I have a reply from The Head of Brand and Talent Management at Channel Mum ? I did email them twice though as I was and still am fuming.Had another email fromt he ASA - my complaint has been allocated a staff member, and will have an outcome within 15 working days.
Still no reply from Channel Mum!
If she is deleting anyone that doesn't agree with her I really do think it is RIP for her channel. We'll find it rotting away in a shed somewhere. People soon cotton on when the comments are only positive. Have some balls woman and defend yourselve rather than delete and block.She has deleted all the sensible comments that were making perfectly valid points. I was really disappointed to see featheringtheemptynest simpering after her too. Another one unfollowed.
You must be very boredMy reply back to CM.
Dear Ms Lxxxx
I'm disappointed in your reply. Are you really saying that she didn't break the ASA rules? I'd just like you to clarify that for me as I would disagree and if you are saying that then you and your team really need legal guidance on the new rules.
If you are trying to make it seem a bit 'woolly' that this didn't fall under the CAP code (which I personally believe it does because the Meldrums had to give over some of their holiday to be photographed for the F&F Instagram account, thus meaning there was an element of 'control') then you should be aware even if you and Rebecca Meldrum are claiming there was no control it still falls under CMA and if it is not an ad covered by the CAP Code but there was still ‘paid’ (in money or in kind), the consumer protection legislation enforced by the CMA still applies.
As such all video/photography should still prominently be labelled as ‘Advertisement
Feature’ or ‘Advertisement Promotion’, and to have regard to the ASA/CAP guidelines.
If you had cared to look at the link I sent you, or had familiarised yourself with the new framework you would obviously know this.
I feel your email and Rebecca Meldrums reply both scream of sorry, not sorry.
Your creator lied, she didn't make a "boob" she lied. And ultimately as her agent you allowed that to happen, and are still covering her backside with the reply you have sent to me.
I'm disappointed, but not surprised.
Regards, Mrs
On a side note, when I emailed I used 'Mrs surname' as a sign off, reply back was a breezy 'hi first-name'
If someone takes the time to sign off 'Mrs surname' I expect a 'Dear Mrs surname' back. To bring this point to the sender I made sure my response back to her was 'Dear Ms surname'
For as frustrating as it is with the sheep not getting it there’s nothing we can do. You cannot educate dumb!She has definitely deleted comments in the last half hour since I last looked. All hunz are really not getting that it’s a business account with legal responsibilities are they?
It’s all just jealousy apparently