You can turn them off easily enough if for some reason they start sending them out weekly.The thing is though, is it a one off alert?
You can turn them off easily enough if for some reason they start sending them out weekly.The thing is though, is it a one off alert?
I have a Galaxy S8, my partner has a newer version. We both searched for the switch off feature, but could not find it on our phones. I think this is another aspect that has really angered me, we were not given a choice.You can turn them off easily enough if for some reason they start sending them out weekly.
There were video tutorials from places like Refuge showing you how to do soI have a Galaxy S8, my partner has a newer version. We both searched for the switch off feature, but could not find it on our phones. I think this is another aspect that has really angered me, we were not given a choice.
Just because you were incapable of using your phone to switch off the alert and stop the notification coming through, does not mean that your choice was taken away.I have a Galaxy S8, my partner has a newer version. We both searched for the switch off feature, but could not find it on our phones. I think this is another aspect that has really angered me, we were not given a choice.
The information for how to turn these off is easily found.I have a Galaxy S8, my partner has a newer version. We both searched for the switch off feature, but could not find it on our phones. I think this is another aspect that has really angered me, we were not given a choice.
As I said in a different reply, I doubt we'll be getting many of these alerts at all. They might at some point do another test to see if they've ironed out the issues. But in terms of "live" alerts, I'd be surprised if any person sees more than one every few years, probably for flood warnings if they do.The thing is though, is it a one off alert?
I mean I think if your house was about to be flooded you would probably want to get your family and pets out if you could, a tiny bit of advanced warning and knowing where was available to go would be usefulHow much is it costing the taxpayer? Especially if a lot of people don’t want them and a lot not even receiving them , how many people are actually prepared in the event of an emergency with the limited resources we now have available, I think we’ve only got two ambulances to cover a very large area and certainly no army personnel to help.
And it wouldn't involve the whole country with this, either. The idea of the system is that it can be used either nationally or local to even on specific phone mast.Local environment agencies have been doing flood warnings for years. For the areas affected. I have lived through a few.Works quite well and doesn't involve the whole country.
Rather then build on existing systems in place Pod. I think it is better that we should throw billions on this too.My point was this system is already in place.
That’s the thing nobody knows where to go they only send that info along with the alert! How would elderly or disabled people manage if they’re alone? Surely it would be better having a local plan in place and actually give people information on what’s available in the event of an emergency now ,instead of waiting until the emergency happensI mean I think if your house was about to be flooded you would probably want to get your family and pets out if you could, a tiny bit of advanced warning and knowing where was available to go would be useful
It doesn’t take much for our town centre to flood ,business are destroyed every time there’s torrential rain, nobody can access a sandbag let alone anything elseLocal environment agencies have been doing flood warnings for years. For the areas affected. I have lived through a few.Works quite well and doesn't involve the whole country.
That would be an interesting calculation, there would either be not much in it or the old system would end up with some major previously unseen costs given changes in how things like that are done.The contract was £5.7 million.
---
Bringing back the air raid sirens that were decommissioned might have been cheaper.
It's so frustrating that Fujitsu continue to be so successful in public sector bids mainly due to their size I'm guessing, especially given their massive mess ups in the past.The contract was £5.7 million.
---
Bringing back the air raid sirens that were decommissioned might have been cheaper.
Are they still in partnership with Sunak’s in-laws/ wife? Maybe that’s whyIt's so frustrating that Fujitsu continue to be so successful in public sector bids mainly due to their size I'm guessing, especially given their massive mess ups in the past.
Do you mean Infosys? I'm dubious about that as they are a huge company with tons of partners, including a lot of of software companies other than Fujitsu.Are they still in partnership with Sunak’s in-laws/ wife? Maybe that’s why![]()