Ronlonglegs
VIP Member
The opener to thread is awkward now.
Rip chandler, thanks for the many many laughs
Rip chandler, thanks for the many many laughs
This reminds me of when John Lennon was murdered and someone shoved a microphone in Paul McCartney’s face and asked him how he felt. All he could come up with is “It’s a drag” which was taken to mean that he didn’t care that deeply. In fact he was devastated and could barely find the words.In context I think they just mean when they feel comfortable to do so individually in their own personal way, they shouldn't have to be forced to rush out and post something just because the media are hungry for the clicks.
Indeed - he also follows BBC The One Show! He clearly likes to mix it upWhy should he unfollow porn stars?
Completely agree. He seems to be quite a fragile person in terms of his addiction issues and he’s certainly been photographed looking quite unwell within the past couple of years. I’m not seeing him as the exploitative one here.I think it’s a tad unfair. He’s obviously lonely after his break up and he thought this girl liked him. If anyone’s in the wrong it’s her, why humiliate him like that? He didn’t do anything wrong in my opinion.
I know people just love him, but I honestly wonder if he was ever really clean. I strongly suspect not, sadly. Brooke is another one who never seems to manage being sober. Imagine your kids being deemed safer to live with CHARLIE SHEEN! That’s really saying something.One of his exes did an interview saying he was good at persuading people to do favours like asking her to pick up packages and it was only after a while she realised what she was actually collecting. She said he did it with a few people so his hands would be clean and to everyone, he was drug-free when he was far from it. When asked, she said that was likely how Brooke was or is involved in it. Whether she is telling the truth or bullshitting for attention, I have no clue.
At the minute Brooke is claiming to be clean. She has joint custody of the boys but they live with Charlie and she just visits. One of the clauses is if she tests positive for drugs or alcohol, he gets full custody so I would assume she is regularly tested.
Agree with all this.I did read the book.
And I thought he came across as incredibly self absorbed and selfish.
I read it thinking that it was an account of addiction by someone who’d cleaned up.
But actually, finding out that he hadn’t, doesn’t surprise me. Because it was very clear that he’d not reached the point of being truly sorry for the effect his addiction had had on others.
He was still very much in the poor me stage, and everything was to blame for his addiction but himself.
When they did the Friends reunion thing, I felt like the others excluded him a bit, didn’t fully interact with him, were a bit embarrassed by him. I felt sorry for him.
I now think he’d probably pushed most of them to the limits of friendship.
I’m certain now that the reason they were fairly slow
to put out statements after his death was because they knew they had to tread carefully, given that the sad truth was likely to come out about how clean he was (not).
I don’t know why I feel compelled to write such a lengthy post; I guess I just feel like his life and death are a perfect example of the fact that actors are always acting, and we never should never necessarily believe what they present as their real face.
In context I think they just mean when they feel comfortable to do so individually in their own personal way, they shouldn't have to be forced to rush out and post something just because the media are hungry for the clicks.“In time we will say more”? A slightly odd thing to say