Lydia Millen # 26 - 50 quid for a mitt, a glove and a backscratcher in a plastic bag - Genius!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I honestly don't understand why she didn't go down the home decor route, considering her channel is mostly of that content now.

She could have launched a range of a diffuser, candle and ornamental vase for relatively cheaply, but with all the tonal colours working together, would likely have been purchased together. The diffuser and colours of the candle/vase could have been seasonal, prompting repeat business too.

Even things like monogrammed towels/washcloths in taupes, whites and blacks would have sold well.

I really can't get my head around how she messed it up so badly.

Edited to add:

- initialled pillowcases
- embroidered cushion covers
- faux plants/flowers
- photo frames
- little cooking dishes

Ssoooo many options she could have created!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20
The tit show continues...

And where is Lydia, fire fighting on the keyboard as usual!

Oh and classic detraction technique, posting pictures of gardens again.

Bye Globby.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 16
She got her "product" manufactured in China for a very cheap price but never visited China to see the factory or to go through all that process. She is so lazy and this shows she does not care about the product cause if she did she would have had a few meetings in China to discuss everything like a lot of businesses do. It is your brand you have to take the time and apply yourself.
Not sit your ass at home on top of your ivory tower and let everyobe do their "job" while you have no idea qhat is being done.

She probably got bought these kits ready and just slapped her brand name on it.

Lydia you are delusional if you think your name is strong enough to sell just anything. You are not Chanel darling. Chanel can slap their CC logo on a toilet paper and it will sell out.
Or got her nan to sew on the labels 😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 10
The return page is worth a look at, very strict with the rules for how to return in order for it to be ‘quickly and efficiently’ (same meaning basically) processed. And you have to pay first class at the post office only 😳
How can that be allowed? So not only do you have to pay for your returns, it has to be first class postage? That screams discrimination
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I honestly don't understand why she didn't go down the home decor route, considering her channel is mostly of that content now.

She could have launched a range of a diffuser, candle and ornamental vase for relatively cheaply, but with all the tonal colours working together, would likely have been purchased together. The diffuser and colours of the candle/vase could have been seasonal, prompting repeat business too.

Even things like monogrammed towels/washcloths in taupes, whites and blacks would have sold well.

I really can't get my head around how she messed it up so badly.

Edited to add:

- initialled pillowcases
- embroidered cushion covers
- faux plants/flowers
- photo frames
- little cooking dishes

Ssoooo many options she could have created!
She should thank you got such a great ideas !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
There was someone on this forum in the #25 thread who wondered aloud if this epic Glo flop would garner new Tattle memberships from people who had previously liked and watched Lydia. It has. I am one of them. I am not British. I did not know about this forum. I do now.

After having several of my comments to Lydia deleted off of the Glo Instagram account and going unanswered in her YouTube comments section, I went to the web to research a place, a safe outlet, where I could vent my frustrations to people who clearly have been quicker on the uptake than I have.

I also DM’ed her once this week about the Ca’ Pietra limestone freebie post in Instagram Stories that brought her a backlash so intense she created a highlight reel featuring all of her ASA-based questions to fans. I asked her why she always had to publicly react with a tantrum every time fans called her out for getting something for free. Surely that’s old hat by now? I told her that her constant overreactions and defensiveness made her look petulant. I asked her to exercise a bit of grace. If she doesn’t like the comments, I asked her to buy the product herself to avoid them. If she wants to continue to get product for her own home for free from a UK-based stone company that in no way could bring any benefit to my life by way of recommendation, being an ocean away over here, I asked her to please rise above the consequences of those actions and to stop lashing out.

I thought that was the end of it. Then Glo. Where do I even begin? Luckily, there are so many sharp members here who have already spoken about many issues with the launch and the products proper – her fake inclusivity of the BIPOC community, the unwillingness to reveal the origin of manufacturing, the lack of market research and focus group testing, the environmental catastrophe that is bringing so much more plastic in bulk to the market, her two-faced approach to sustainability, her luxury attitude to her own lifestyle with her own use of top quality natural fabrics and yet her willingness to shill these cheap materials to others, the astronomical price point, the impact on her young, malleable followers – to name a few.

However, there is one point I saw in one comment on her YouTube channel that she actually liked back that, to me, made me angrier than anything else I’ve seen over the past 24 hours. It’s posted below for you to view yourselves. In the comment, the person said that just because people couldn’t afford Lydia’s product didn’t make it a bad product, that it’s “just something out of their reach.” Lydia liked that.

This is where she lost me. We need to talk about the class issue. The idea that Lydia participates in the trope that she belongs to an exclusive community of comfortably well-off pseudo-celebrities shows that she buys into an antiquated class structure that is predicated on her keeping people below her so that she may rise by profiting off of classes she views as beneath her. Her life is aspirational. Fine. But she is personally aspirational in that she is a social climber desperate to raise her status “read: class” to the detriment of others she views as in lowers castes. Do discuss. I’d love some feedback on this.

Now, it’s time to get personal. Originally, I wanted to be like Lydia. I have been following her for six years. I started a YouTube channel and an Instagram account to build a following to whom I could sell recommended products (though, admittedly, ones I actually liked and believed in) and benefit of off affiliate links and brand partnerships.

Though a successful professional with bachelor and masters’ degrees, the shiny prizes that her world proffered caught me in its wake. And, for a year, I participated in the fashion blogging/vlogging sphere. I am so ashamed that I didn’t see what I was perpetuating.

In the past 24 hours, I have questioned how I can do better than Lydia and contribute some good to the world instead of shilling more harm. I shuttered my YouTube account and my Instagram pages. I deleted my blog. I will never produce a photo of me with a product ever again. Actually, I’m going to ground and living off of my little savings until I can get a real job, for which my degrees prepared me. And my savings are so little because I was living above my means. The Jo Malone candles, the ceramic vases and pots, the props for Instagram flat lays, the camera and lighting equipment. I am so ashamed and embarrassed that this has been my aspirational life for years.

I hope your group will accept me here despite my past actions. I can’t believe I upheld Lydia on that pedestal on which she places herself. After this launch and all of the feedback and comments she, like me, has surely read, she should be curled in a ball in the corner crying tears of shame into her Dior and Louis Vuitton blankets. I’ve never felt freer to have been proven so wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 157
I believe in the U.K. retailers only have to except returns if theres a problem with the goods as the legal minimum. However, most retailers go above that and allow returns because you’ve changed your mind and can make you pay the cost of returning the item.

the only bit that may change the above is the distance selling regulations, which give you 14 days to cancel the purchase. Im not sure on which takes precedent and in what circumstances though.

i guess the reality of retail is it’s not straight forward and there’s a good reason to employ or consult a specialist to check you’re compliant with the law! Lidl won’t have bothered because she thinks she knows it all, but will quickly realise people are not forgiving when it comes to retail.
Actually, under UK consumer law you have more rights online and you are given a 14 cancellation or cooling off period whereby you’re allowed to return products. You may have to pay for P&P but you ABSOLUTELY have every right to return products within 14 days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Usually when these influencers launch products, they have small stock levels (2-3k) like Lydia, so they can gush and celebrate how they sold out in 24 hours!!
Well..... 24 hours later and Lydia hasn’t sold 25% of her rip off items in the prime selling window!!! She’ll be lucky to shift this little amount in 6 months!!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 22
The truth of it all is Lydiot only cares about Lydiot, all that over the top manic behaviour stops as soon as she turns her camera 📸 off. She just wants to be rich at the cost of her viewers, she is a Fake, she has and always will do the bare minimum to get as much money/freebies as she can. She's a narcissistic and her husband/friend enables her because they are more than happy to reep what ill gained 'STUFF' she receives. She's not a nice person, shes aggressive, selfish, greedy and vain 🤨
 
  • Like
Reactions: 27
She got her "product" manufactured in China for a very cheap price but never visited China to see the factory or to go through all that process. She is so lazy and this shows she does not care about the product cause if she did she would have had a few meetings in China to discuss everything like a lot of businesses do. It is your brand you have to take the time and apply yourself.
Not sit your ass at home on top of your ivory tower and let everyobe do their "job" while you have no idea qhat is being done.

She probably got bought these kits ready and just slapped her brand name on it.

Lydia you are delusional if you think your name is strong enough to sell just anything. You are not Chanel darling. Chanel can slap their CC logo on a toilet paper and it will sell out.
She will have been sent samples and then told them where she wants the branding......and this took 2 years!!!!!!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 14
Usually when these influencers launch products, they have small stock levels (2-3k) like Lydia, so they can gush and celebrate how they sold out in 24 hours!!
Well..... 24 hours later and Lydia hasn’t sold 25% of her rip off items in the prime selling window!!! She’ll be lucky to shift this little amount in 6 months!!!!
Rip off items equates to rest in peace items
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
So Josies new YT vlog is up and she mentions the Glo independent tanning kit or :LOL: whatever the hell it is.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sick
Reactions: 8
There was someone on this forum in the #25 thread who wondered aloud if this epic Glo flop would garner new Tattle memberships from people who had previously liked and watched Lydia. It has. I am one of them. I am not British. I did not know about this forum. I do now.

After having several of my comments to Lydia deleted off of the Glo Instagram account and going unanswered in her YouTube comments section, I went to the web to research a place, a safe outlet, where I could vent my frustrations to people who clearly have been quicker on the uptake than I have.

I also DM’ed her once this week about the Ca’ Pietra limestone freebie post in Instagram Stories that brought her a backlash so intense she created a highlight reel featuring all of her ASA-based questions to fans. I asked her why she always had to publicly react with a tantrum every time fans called her out for getting something for free. Surely that’s old hat by now? I told her that her constant overreactions and defensiveness made her look petulant. I asked her to exercise a bit of grace. If she doesn’t like the comments, I asked her to buy the product herself to avoid them. If she wants to continue to get product for her own home for free from a UK-based stone company that in no way could bring any benefit to my life by way of recommendation, being an ocean away over here, I asked her to please rise above the consequences of those actions and to stop lashing out.

I thought that was the end of it. Then Glo. Where do I even begin? Luckily, there are so many sharp members here who have already spoken about many issues with the launch and the products proper – her fake inclusivity of the BIPOC community, the unwillingness to reveal the origin of manufacturing, the lack of market research and focus group testing, the environmental catastrophe that is bringing so much more plastic in bulk to the market, her two-faced approach to sustainability, her luxury attitude to her own lifestyle with her own use of top quality natural fabrics and yet her willingness to shill these cheap materials to others, the astronomical price point, the impact on her young, malleable followers – to name a few.

However, there is one point I saw in one comment on her YouTube channel that she actually liked back that, to me, made me angrier than anything else I’ve seen over the past 24 hours. It’s posted below for you to view yourselves. In the comment, the person said that just because people couldn’t afford Lydia’s product didn’t make it a bad product, that it’s “just something out of their reach.” Lydia liked that.

This is where she lost me. We need to talk about the class issue. The idea that Lydia participates in the trope that she belongs to an exclusive community of comfortably well-off pseudo-celebrities shows that she buys into an antiquated class structure that is predicated on her keeping people below her so that she may rise by profiting off of classes she views as beneath her. Her life is aspirational. Fine. But she is personally aspirational in that she is a social climber desperate to raise her status “read: class” to the detriment of others she views as in lowers castes. Do discuss. I’d love some feedback on this.

Now, it’s time to get personal. Originally, I wanted to be like Lydia. I have been following her for six years. I started a YouTube channel and an Instagram account to build a following to whom I could sell recommended products (though, admittedly, ones I actually liked and believed in) and benefit of off affiliate links and brand partnerships.

Though a successful professional with bachelor and masters’ degrees, the shiny prizes that her world proffered caught me in its wake. And, for a year, I participated in the fashion blogging/vlogging sphere. I am so ashamed that I didn’t see what I was perpetuating.

In the past 24 hours, I have questioned how I can do better than Lydia and contribute some good to the world instead of shilling more harm. I shuttered my YouTube account and my Instagram pages. I deleted my blog. I will never produce a photo of me with a product ever again. Actually, I’m going to ground and living off of my little savings until I can get a real job, for which my degrees prepared me. And my savings are so little because I was living above my means. The Jo Malone candles, the ceramic vases and pots, the props for Instagram flat lays, the camera and lighting equipment. I am so ashamed and embarrassed that this has been my aspirational life for years.

I hope your group will accept me here despite my past actions. I can’t believe I upheld Lydia on that pedestal on which she places herself. After this launch and all of the feedback and comments she, like me, has surely read, she should be curled in a ball in the corner crying tears of shame into her Dior and Louis Vuitton blankets. I’ve never felt freer to have been proven so wrong.
WELCOME!🍾
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26
Actually, under UK consumer law you have more rights online and you are given a 14 cancellation or cooling off period whereby you’re allowed to return products. You may have to pay for P&P but you ABSOLUTELY have every right to return products within 14 days.
Yeah that’s distance selling regs which I did mention in my post to be fair. I just said I wasn’t sure as I’m not close to how it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
There was someone on this forum in the #25 thread who wondered aloud if this epic Glo flop would garner new Tattle memberships from people who had previously liked and watched Lydia. It has. I am one of them. I am not British. I did not know about this forum. I do now.

After having several of my comments to Lydia deleted off of the Glo Instagram account and going unanswered in her YouTube comments section, I went to the web to research a place, a safe outlet, where I could vent my frustrations to people who clearly have been quicker on the uptake than I have.

I also DM’ed her once this week about the Ca’ Pietra limestone freebie post in Instagram Stories that brought her a backlash so intense she created a highlight reel featuring all of her ASA-based questions to fans. I asked her why she always had to publicly react with a tantrum every time fans called her out for getting something for free. Surely that’s old hat by now? I told her that her constant overreactions and defensiveness made her look petulant. I asked her to exercise a bit of grace. If she doesn’t like the comments, I asked her to buy the product herself to avoid them. If she wants to continue to get product for her own home for free from a UK-based stone company that in no way could bring any benefit to my life by way of recommendation, being an ocean away over here, I asked her to please rise above the consequences of those actions and to stop lashing out.

I thought that was the end of it. Then Glo. Where do I even begin? Luckily, there are so many sharp members here who have already spoken about many issues with the launch and the products proper – her fake inclusivity of the BIPOC community, the unwillingness to reveal the origin of manufacturing, the lack of market research and focus group testing, the environmental catastrophe that is bringing so much more plastic in bulk to the market, her two-faced approach to sustainability, her luxury attitude to her own lifestyle with her own use of top quality natural fabrics and yet her willingness to shill these cheap materials to others, the astronomical price point, the impact on her young, malleable followers – to name a few.

However, there is one point I saw in one comment on her YouTube channel that she actually liked back that, to me, made me angrier than anything else I’ve seen over the past 24 hours. It’s posted below for you to view yourselves. In the comment, the person said that just because people couldn’t afford Lydia’s product didn’t make it a bad product, that it’s “just something out of their reach.” Lydia liked that.

This is where she lost me. We need to talk about the class issue. The idea that Lydia participates in the trope that she belongs to an exclusive community of comfortably well-off pseudo-celebrities shows that she buys into an antiquated class structure that is predicated on her keeping people below her so that she may rise by profiting off of classes she views as beneath her. Her life is aspirational. Fine. But she is personally aspirational in that she is a social climber desperate to raise her status “read: class” to the detriment of others she views as in lowers castes. Do discuss. I’d love some feedback on this.

Now, it’s time to get personal. Originally, I wanted to be like Lydia. I have been following her for six years. I started a YouTube channel and an Instagram account to build a following to whom I could sell recommended products (though, admittedly, ones I actually liked and believed in) and benefit of off affiliate links and brand partnerships.

Though a successful professional with bachelor and masters’ degrees, the shiny prizes that her world proffered caught me in its wake. And, for a year, I participated in the fashion blogging/vlogging sphere. I am so ashamed that I didn’t see what I was perpetuating.

In the past 24 hours, I have questioned how I can do better than Lydia and contribute some good to the world instead of shilling more harm. I shuttered my YouTube account and my Instagram pages. I deleted my blog. I will never produce a photo of me with a product ever again. Actually, I’m going to ground and living off of my little savings until I can get a real job, for which my degrees prepared me. And my savings are so little because I was living above my means. The Jo Malone candles, the ceramic vases and pots, the props for Instagram flat lays, the camera and lighting equipment. I am so ashamed and embarrassed that this has been my aspirational life for years.

I hope your group will accept me here despite my past actions. I can’t believe I upheld Lydia on that pedestal on which she places herself. After this launch and all of the feedback and comments she, like me, has surely read, she should be curled in a ball in the corner crying tears of shame into her Dior and Louis Vuitton blankets. I’ve never felt freer to have been proven so wrong.
Wow. You’re right! Justifying the price point and admitting it’s out of reach for most, as if validating her place in the upper classes. I don’t feel sorry for her, I feel sorry for those who adore her and wanted to support her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31
I honestly don't understand why she didn't go down the home decor route, considering her channel is mostly of that content now.

She could have launched a range of a diffuser, candle and ornamental vase for relatively cheaply, but with all the tonal colours working together, would likely have been purchased together. The diffuser and colours of the candle/vase could have been seasonal, prompting repeat business too.

Even things like monogrammed towels/washcloths in taupes, whites and blacks would have sold well.

I really can't get my head around how she messed it up so badly.

Edited to add:

- initialled pillowcases
- embroidered cushion covers
- faux plants/flowers
- photo frames
- little cooking dishes

Ssoooo many options she could have created!
She should pay you for advice! I agree she’d have been better of doing ANY of those things. Instead she got a £2 tit kit from China. Would LOOOVE to know the working conditions and if they workers get a fair wage but she won’t have looked into that will she
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.