Lucy Letby Case #79

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts
S

SpendTooMuchTimeOnHere

Pinky Joe said:
Is the public actually reacting? I am not sure they are.
Click to expand...
They are reading the headlines from the press conference and saying that letby is innocent. Most of the stuff in the press conference has already been debunked. I wish people would look at all the evidence before sprouting nonsense like ‘I knew there was something off about this’ and ‘my gut was telling me that she was innocent from the start’

Who starts a new job by saying that they can’t wait for their first death to ‘get it out of the way’. That’s down right bizarre
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 25
R

Refracton

sebanna said:
One of the consultants, possibly Dr Brearey, mentioned low blood sugars in premature babies and said its actually rare as they are managing the sugar intake for them. Chase said in the report that they have done studies where babies have been given too much insulin, although not sure if he referenced them.

The insulin poisonings is easy to prove. They were definitely poisoned.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I totally agree. Chase must be the least ' eminent' too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
B

barber23

Refracton said:
i am being a bit thick here. So correct me but the insulin cases that Geoff says are perfectly normal in neonates.
surely this would be easy to prove in others. It isn't like air and tge babies survived. So surely there must be loads of babies with this low readings under 2.6 with the same symptoms. If perfectly normal.
What I mean is. Unlike air this would be easier to prove.
Click to expand...
They would have to be tested first, obviously. Are neonates routinely tested for insulin and C peptide?
 
AllieBee

AllieBee

barber23 said:
They would have to be tested first, obviously. Are neonates routinely tested for insulin and C peptide?
Click to expand...
No they aren't. For that Chase to be right in what he's said there would be tons of babies with low C pep, high insulin levels and hypoglycaemia. It's just a stupid thing to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
S

sebanna

The high insulin must be expected. Baby F had double the amount of glucose he needed so he would have needed a high level of functioning insulin to remove the sugar from his blood. It's the low c peptide (proving he didn't make the insulin himself )which proves he was poisoned.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
JarvisCockerSpaniel

JarvisCockerSpaniel

Well you can’t say anything about Letby being a weirdo apparently. ‘Having stuffed toys in your bed, only shopping at Matalan and collecting notes out of the bin to take home doesn’t make you a murderer!!!’

Well no but they’re all things a convicted murderer actually did aren’t they 😅
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 14
T

Tofino

I bet he’s not even sick and he got one of his mason mates to find a way to excuse him on imaginary medical grounds. Too much of a bloody coincidence that the powerful one with many links to Freemasons, a dodgy police history and an extraordinary rise through NHS ranks is not available to give evidence.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 16
O'lee

O'lee

Tofino said:
I bet he’s not even sick and he got one of his mason mates to find a way to excuse him on imaginary medical grounds. Too much of a bloody coincidence that the powerful one with many links to Freemasons, a dodgy police history and an extraordinary rise through NHS ranks is not available to give evidence.
Click to expand...
I suspect his supposed illness is about as real as Andy from Little Britain's disability....
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 13
T

Tofino

IMG_4319.jpeg


Oh they were the #bekind brigade of executives 🙄

Perfect example how “be kind” in every situation just does not work.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 15
S

sebanna

It was interesting how Susan Gilby said Tony Chambers had never been concerned enough to refer any doctor to the GMC in six years!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 7
T

Tofino

sebanna said:
It was interesting how Susan Gilby said Tony Chambers had never been concerned enough to refer any doctor to the GMC in six years!
Click to expand...
I think that was Ian Harvey because he later went on to ask Dr Gilby to report the paediatricians to GMC because he didn’t want to break his record!!!

I haven’t got to that bit myself yet but I saw it on Reddit.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 8
T

Tofino

Anyone still parroting ‘RCPCH and Jane Hawdon didn’t find deliberate harm’ can duck off with all those that say the same about the original post mortems. You can’t keep ignoring the fact that none of it was done properly

IMG_4326.jpeg
IMG_4327.jpeg


(This was a conversation with Sir Duncan who was apparently horrified)
IMG_4328.jpeg
IMG_4329.jpeg
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.