Do the people giving an opinion actually bother reading all the evidence that shows evidence of harm? Such as X rays of air in blood vessels or reports of ruptured livers? Nobody has actually tried to explain how two babies randomly started producing loads and loads of insulin without c peptide and how this suddenly stopped and never occured again. Also the unit went through twice the amount of insulin they should have at the same time. Yet journalists want to blame sewage.
The ruptured liver on Baby O, a similar injury on his brother Baby P a day later, Baby E (baby in distress, Letby seen doing nothing to help) Baby K (baby in distress, Letby seen doing nothing to help), Baby N bleeding from his throat and screaming (shades of Baby E), the insulin poisonings (F&L) and what happened to their respective brothers (E and M, the latter going from stable, to deaths door and then back to normal), Baby G projectile vomiting but still having a 45ml feed aspirated from her, the weird rashes and discolouration that the NNU staff had never seen before. Babies collapsing just after the parents or NNU staff had left.
Letby's lies about her knowledge of air embolism, her lies about not remembering Baby D and Baby K, her lies about not deliberately taking handover sheets, her lies about not owning a shredder, her lies about being isolated from colleagues, the two bogus Datix reports she filed when she knew people suspected her, the falsified medical records.
To quote Nick Johnson in his closing speech at the first trial "All the clues point in one direction, don't they....she's sitting in the back of court"