The jury were so, so thorough so she certainly can’t claim it was poorly considered. And she hoarded personal information and wrote a bloody confession note, FFS! She’d have to prove each full life sentence was wrong too, she can’t just address one of them. She had nobody to testify for her.Well if that is all they have then she is stuffed then because the Jury deliberated on the evidence in front of them and decided that she was guilty so tough ducks to Lucy.
Actually I'd be more worried if she had been found guilty of ALL charges (I know that probably sounds stupid) but the fact she was found NG of some and no verdict reached on others gives me faith that the jury deliberated lawfully and took all the evidence into account.
Something tells me Lucy just wants to stick another boot into the families of the babies and also I expect her parents are the driving force for this anyway.
She doesn't stand a chance in my opinion.
Just seen the other responses to your post! Please don't lurk, join in nobody bites xx
Circumstantial is a debateable label- she wasn’t photographed doing it and there was no DNA evidence, but nor would you expect this to be the case in that environment.
It is stressful to think of the poor parents, but it will be satisfying when she angrily realises she can’t change it and goes into the inevitable sentence.