Is the profile picture Trump with blood round his mouth? Is he now saying the the yellow post it note was to baby O, P and I not the surviving triplet? Despite Lucy agreeing in court that it was to all the triplets.
Is the profile picture Trump with blood round his mouth? Is he now saying the the yellow post it note was to baby O, P and I not the surviving triplet? Despite Lucy agreeing in court that it was to all the triplets.Hahaha! They remind me of one of her supporters. This guy is from Twitter. He’s the one who’s deciphering her post it notes
---
He has alsofakeddeciphered another post it note
And has had the nerve to call Judge Matt Goss ‘unhinged’!!
This the post about it. The information in the graph does not make point they think it does.Science on Trial posted saying that deaths continued to rise after Lucifer was taken off the unit. They used a graph that most of us have seen before, the one that has the area figures on it where COCH figures are in grey & shows that deaths decreased. They are stating that COCH has the only maternity & neonatal departments in the area, so it proves that deaths increased instead of decreased. A few people called them out over it & argued that they were misrepresenting the data. I think they are too. I’ll share the screenshots so you can see what you think.
Hahaha! Exactly… He’s a right JokerHis profile pic is that and Judge Goss is the unhinged one?!
I think it’s Trump as The Joker from Batman.Is the profile picture Trump with blood round his mouth? Is he now saying the the yellow post it note was to baby O, P and I not the surviving triplet? Despite Lucy agreeing in court that it was to all the triplets.
Yes that one, but I'd like to know where it is from originally. I can't find the source.This graph?
---
This the post about it. The information in the graph does not make point they think it does.
Baby Q didn’t die though soHahaha! Exactly… He’s a right Joker
https://giphy.com/AwoDg0wJImOjK ---
He’s saying it was to baby O,P & Q… He can’t even get that bit right!
So baby Q (in this note) is a reference to the surviving triplet and this guy doesn't think it is extremely odd that she is pretending that he is dead!!Hahaha! Exactly… He’s a right Joker
https://giphy.com/AwoDg0wJImOjK ---
He’s saying it was to baby O,P & Q… He can’t even get that bit right!
Yeah it is. They haven’t got a clue, the bunch of clownsThey really actually don’t know a thing about the case do theyit’s fucking painful how idiotic they are.
Yeah, that’s about right. Bloody idiot he is!So baby Q (in this note) is a reference to the surviving triplet and this guy doesn't think it is extremely odd that she is pretending that he is dead!!
I’ve just had a look for the source, I assumed it was an official ons/mbrrace graph but it isn’t. I bet it’s something science on trial made up themselvesYes that one, but I'd like to know where it is from originally. I can't find the source.
Imagine being a clever scientist and statistician and not being able to understand a simple bar chart that 10 year olds are taught to interpret in primary school. Fucking pricks.Looking at the graph if Cheshire West and COCH were the same wouldn't the data be the same. The yellow bar shows less deaths, than the grey, in 2015 and 2016, because its deaths per 1000 babies, and more babies are included which brings the death rate down.
But she's aI wonder if these oddballs can explain why Letby had retained 257 pieces of paperwork relating to patients records, including the babies she has been convicted of murdering & attempted to murder in her home.
I'm not sure what standard practice is but pretty sure there is zero reason why she would need them and it breaks Confidentiality & data protection regulations.
Non-specialists? So facebook detectives thenYeah it is. They haven’t got a clue, the bunch of clowns
---
Yeah, that’s about right. Bloody idiot he is!
---
Talking of clowns… If anyone fancies a laugh these nutters are holding another Zoom meeting on Tuesday
yes they definitely did the graph themselves, it was probably Gill that said it so either him or one of his buddies. I think they used the FOI report and the ONS stats.I’ve just had a look for the source, I assumed it was an official ons/mbrrace graph but it isn’t. I bet it’s something science on trial made up themselves
What’s funny is that they’ve made this graph to try and prove something, but it absolutely doesn’t. Even 11 year olds also know how to read a bar graph, and it doesn’t make the point they think it’s making.yes they definitely did the graph themselves, it was probably Gill that said it so either him or one of his buddies. I think they used the FOI report and the ONS stats.
Yes I bet it was Dicky, the utter fool!yes they definitely did the graph themselves, it was probably Gill that said it so either him or one of his buddies. I think they used the FOI report and the ONS stats.
Yes it is, they’re absolute idiots.What’s funny is that they’ve made this graph to try and prove something, but it absolutely doesn’t. Even 11 year olds also know how to read a bar graph, and it doesn’t make the point they think it’s making.
If they were going to try and manipulate data to make it match their twisted ideas, you’d think these people would do a better job.
Fucking nutters. Scary we breathe the same oxygen as these wankers.
Their explanation is "she collects paper".I wonder if these oddballs can explain why Letby had retained 257 pieces of paperwork relating to patients records, including the babies she has been convicted of murdering & attempted to murder in her home.
I'm not sure what standard practice is but pretty sure there is zero reason why she would need them and it breaks Confidentiality & data protection regulations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?