Lucy Letby Case #68

[sebanna]

Hahaha! They remind me of one of her supporters. This guy is from Twitter. He’s the one who’s deciphering her post it notes
---
He has also faked deciphered another post it note

And has had the nerve to call Judge Matt Goss ‘unhinged’!!

Is the profile picture Trump with blood round his mouth? Is he now saying the the yellow post it note was to baby O, P and I not the surviving triplet? Despite Lucy agreeing in court that it was to all the triplets.

 

[Ghostranch]

Does anyone have a link to the graph the science on trial morons are sharing and misrepresenting? I can't find the actual graph.

 

[sebanna]

This graph?
---

Science on Trial posted saying that deaths continued to rise after Lucifer was taken off the unit. They used a graph that most of us have seen before, the one that has the area figures on it where COCH figures are in grey & shows that deaths decreased. They are stating that COCH has the only maternity & neonatal departments in the area, so it proves that deaths increased instead of decreased. A few people called them out over it & argued that they were misrepresenting the data. I think they are too. I’ll share the screenshots so you can see what you think.

This the post about it. The information in the graph does not make point they think it does.

 

[sazzt]

His profile pic is that and Judge Goss is the unhinged one?!

Hahaha! Exactly… He’s a right Joker


---

Is the profile picture Trump with blood round his mouth? Is he now saying the the yellow post it note was to baby O, P and I not the surviving triplet? Despite Lucy agreeing in court that it was to all the triplets.

I think it’s Trump as The Joker from Batman.
He’s saying it was to baby O,P & Q… He can’t even get that bit right!

 

[Ghostranch]

This graph?
---


This the post about it. The information in the graph does not make point they think it does.

Yes that one, but I'd like to know where it is from originally. I can't find the source.

 

[LittleMy]

Hahaha! Exactly… He’s a right Joker


---

He’s saying it was to baby O,P & Q… He can’t even get that bit right!

Baby Q didn’t die though so

 

[MmmB777]

They really actually don’t know a thing about the case do they it’s bleeping painful how idiotic they are.

 

[Hazara04]

Hahaha! Exactly… He’s a right Joker


---

He’s saying it was to baby O,P & Q… He can’t even get that bit right!

So baby Q (in this note) is a reference to the surviving triplet and this guy doesn't think it is extremely odd that she is pretending that he is dead!!

 

[sazzt]

They really actually don’t know a thing about the case do they it’s bleeping painful how idiotic they are.

Yeah it is. They haven’t got a clue, the bunch of clowns
---

So baby Q (in this note) is a reference to the surviving triplet and this guy doesn't think it is extremely odd that she is pretending that he is dead!!

Yeah, that’s about right. Bloody idiot he is!
---
Talking of clowns… If anyone fancies a laugh these nutters are holding another Zoom meeting on Tuesday

 

[IGiveUp22]

The fact they think the whole case was based on the post it notes genuinely proves how little they know about the entire trial.
Plus, I’m sure when they come to try get their evidence/appeal through the proper channels that calling the judge unhinged for no other reason than they disagree with the verdict will definitely get them far

 

[sazzt]

Yes that one, but I'd like to know where it is from originally. I can't find the source.

I’ve just had a look for the source, I assumed it was an official ons/mbrrace graph but it isn’t. I bet it’s something science on trial made up themselves

 

[Hazara04]

I wonder if these oddballs can explain why Letby had retained 257 pieces of paperwork relating to patients records, including the babies she has been convicted of murdering & attempted to murder in her home.

I'm not sure what standard practice is but pretty sure there is zero reason why she would need them and it breaks Confidentiality & data protection regulations.

 

[jackssack]

Looking at the graph if Cheshire West and COCH were the same wouldn't the data be the same. The yellow bar shows less deaths, than the grey, in 2015 and 2016, because its deaths per 1000 babies, and more babies are included which brings the death rate down.

Imagine being a clever scientist and statistician and not being able to understand a simple bar chart that 10 year olds are taught to interpret in primary school. bleeping pricks.

 

[mumpty]

That bar chart shows clear as day that something (LL) was wrong at COCH in 2015/16. Much higher mortality rate than in the years before and after and much higher than the wider area of Chester and Chester West mortality rate. I’m inclined to think that the people presenting this data know they are spouting rubbish too

 

[Marie958519]

I wonder if these oddballs can explain why Letby had retained 257 pieces of paperwork relating to patients records, including the babies she has been convicted of murdering & attempted to murder in her home.

I'm not sure what standard practice is but pretty sure there is zero reason why she would need them and it breaks Confidentiality & data protection regulations.

But she's a collector

 

[jackssack]

Yeah it is. They haven’t got a clue, the bunch of clowns
---

Yeah, that’s about right. Bloody idiot he is!
---
Talking of clowns… If anyone fancies a laugh these nutters are holding another Zoom meeting on Tuesday

Non-specialists? So facebook detectives then
If this is her best chance of being exonerated then she needn't worry about renewing her matalan card as she won't be needing it.

 

[Tofino]

I’ve just had a look for the source, I assumed it was an official ons/mbrrace graph but it isn’t. I bet it’s something science on trial made up themselves

yes they definitely did the graph themselves, it was probably Gill that said it so either him or one of his buddies. I think they used the FOI report and the ONS stats.

 

[bluefootedbooby]

yes they definitely did the graph themselves, it was probably Gill that said it so either him or one of his buddies. I think they used the FOI report and the ONS stats.

What’s funny is that they’ve made this graph to try and prove something, but it absolutely doesn’t. Even 11 year olds also know how to read a bar graph, and it doesn’t make the point they think it’s making.

If they were going to try and manipulate data to make it match their twisted ideas, you’d think these people would do a better job.

bleeping nutters. Scary we breathe the same oxygen as these wankers.

 

[sazzt]

yes they definitely did the graph themselves, it was probably Gill that said it so either him or one of his buddies. I think they used the FOI report and the ONS stats.

Yes I bet it was Dicky, the utter fool!
---

What’s funny is that they’ve made this graph to try and prove something, but it absolutely doesn’t. Even 11 year olds also know how to read a bar graph, and it doesn’t make the point they think it’s making.

If they were going to try and manipulate data to make it match their twisted ideas, you’d think these people would do a better job.

bleeping nutters. Scary we breathe the same oxygen as these wankers.

Yes it is, they’re absolute idiots.
I checked theirs FB page earlier & they’ve deleted some of the comments they were arguing about last night. They’ve obviously realised they were talking crap!

 

[tay65]

I wonder if these oddballs can explain why Letby had retained 257 pieces of paperwork relating to patients records, including the babies she has been convicted of murdering & attempted to murder in her home.

I'm not sure what standard practice is but pretty sure there is zero reason why she would need them and it breaks Confidentiality & data protection regulations.

Their explanation is "she collects paper".