Also if JG is possibly willing to let jurors have these appointments next week if they can’t be rearranged, he’s defo not going to stop you attending your wedding which you’ve likely had booked for months, possibly years!
Totally agree! I know we don’t know the facts about the delays with the jury but I’m finding it so frustrating now so I can’t even imagine how the families must feel. I felt sorry for the jury as it’s a long and difficult trial but I’m struggling to have any sympathy for anyone but the parents at this stage.The families must feel like their 'bad luck' (to put it mildly) will never end. To have a baby born too soon or poorly, to then have that baby (against the odds) die, to then find out that precious tiny baby has possibly been murdered and could have survived, then for it to take years to bring the person suspected of murder to court, then for the trial to take an unimaginably long time (with loads of starts, stops, breaks), to finally get to deliberations and be landed with a jury with problems, delays, no-shows, longest time ever to deliberate and now who all want to duck about at their 'appointments' next week instead of taking their responsibility to your little baby's life seriously. I'm so gutted for them.
They don’t have to be. They can join the public gallery or just go once they’ve been dismissed.Are the jury present during sentencing?
Lots of jurors choose to go back for sentencing but they don't have to. I didn't but I did phone the court to find out the sentence.Are the jury present during sentencing?
Those jurors sound like a right load of entitled karen's and Ken's
These jurors will be straight on their way homeThey don’t have to be. They can join the public gallery or just go once they’ve been dismissed.
I agree that the jurors must have known one of them needed a week off and presumed there would be another weeks pause. There's no point dismissing a juror though if the others are going to make appointments and not be available. I bet everyone involved in this trial just wants it over with, but at the moment it feels like it will never end.I think I'm in the minority but I really don't think it was a health issue with the dismissed juror, I think it was more likely they are getting married and going on honeymoon. They probably informed JG of this way ahead of time and advised they wanted to continue in order to try and get a verdict beforehand but it hasn't happened. The rest of them probably thought "bonus, week off then" but JG has said, "soz fella, this needs wrapping up, we can't wait, you're out". He said it was inevitable so something definitely planned in advance and I don't know why, but I just don't think it was anything like surgery. I'm absolutely certain that them thinking they wouldn't sit next week was to do with that juror, though. It's got to be. There's no reason for them to think they wouldn't be sitting next week unless they thought one of them had a legitimate reason to be given the time off and assumed they would get a break because of it.
Is this him acknowledging Letby is a serial killer?Maybe the juror that was discharged yesterday thought they’d be done by now but had something they needed to attend next week and the jury thought they wouldn’t sit. Since they’ve been discharged which they may not have expected, they’ve been told they are in next week? I’m just pondering. Anyway, is he asking for himself here or….. View attachment 2356006
I’m actually glad it’s not gone to a majority yet, because it could have gone very badly if the juror that left was on the G train.Is it because of the Scottish BH they thought court was out?
I'm feeling a bit discombobulated by it all to be honest, I did think he'd go with majority. Would the loss of 1 juror affect this?
oh I was but only because my son was swimming!! Nothing excitingAnyone else thinking our Queen toffifee is quiet today![]()