And, as the judge pointed out, this is his OPINION that he has been repeatedly stating. The opinion of the defence barrister isn’t evidence.
Thanks so much for keeping us updated throughout the day3:44pm
The judge says Dr Evans said the pneumonia infection did not cause Child C's collapse.
The cause was "difficult to explain".
Initially, he said it was unexplained.
He said excessive air in the stomach can cause 'splinting of the diaphragm'.
The judge he had not given that conclusion before giving evidence, and it was not advanced in his eight reports.
Dr Evans denied he was 'coming up with things now to support an allegation of harm'.
Dr Evans said from an academic point of view, air embolus could not be excluded.
The judge says Mr Myers was critical of this late conclusion.
Dr Bohin had said her conclusion of the 'bubble in the stomach' was if the NGT was not on free drainage, then it could have been accumulation of gas by CPAP.
The alternative was the deliberate administration of air via the NGT.
She said Child C died with pneumonia, but not because of pneumonia, and that would have made Child C less responsive to resuscitation.
In reaction to questions about bowel obstructions, she said Child C would have had a distended abdomen, and normal bowel sounds would not have been heard.
The judge said Dr Bohin had added: "There were no clinical indicators of obstruction".
Congratulations!!!Gonna read through in a minute but I need to share.... I am with child...
Aw a sloth, one of my favourite animals.Actual footage of Lucy Letby going to get the camera.
Love this, thankyou and welcome!Newbie alert - omg can’t believe I’m finally here on planet Tattle ! I feel a bit starstruck tbh having read you all on here every day for months…after following CS since October.
Thank you for keeping me smiling and sometimes guffawing ( usually @DellaC ) amid this utter horror show.
I’m not ginger - but had a ginger Granny if that helps?
Camp G
I was in the law 19 years and in court a lot - mostly family proceedings but also crime in my earlier years of practice and have been following the etiquette and shenanigans in court closely. I’ve not physically been to Manchester CC as I live too far ( not sure how I’d justify that one to the hubster) . From the reporting, BNE has been ingenious and pretty understated in his approach, which often holds more credence in person than the dramatic shouty effect approach (Bowel). Although I agree the podcast makes BNE sound catty and camp and does his gravitas as an advocate no favours!
I’ve seen some unbelievably toe-curlingly biased “summing up” from judges including one judge in the South East who basically directed the jury “ you basically have to decide whether or not the skinheads are telling the truth or not”!
I think Boss Goss is being very measured and fair.
@Tofino I’m sure BNE and team would be delighted to use your chronology of the evidence - I’ve no doubt these guys have juniors who are aware of these forums. Ultimately I have faith the jury will do the right thing for these babies and their families![]()
Me too, feels so much more positive todayIt's soooo reassuring to hear so many new members are convinced of her guilt. Feeling much more positive this week.
I quite like the rose and lemon one - mostly cos my mum loves it and got it every Christmas and it was like her special thing that we weren't allowed to share apart from a tiny taste. The one in the purple wrapper with chocolate on it is rank though.I have to say I'm finding it HUGELY suspicious that all the newbies like Turkish Delight.....
The judge is slaying his summing up.
I also don’t like Turkish Delight![]()