I went to court today as well (with my friend), I noticed you were there too at the opposite side. I totally agree with everything you've said. I read the CS report and that was like a skeleton (without the flesh) in comparison to what Judge Goss said. When he described the Expert witnesses he outlined where they had trained, what qualifications they had obtained, where they had worked during their careers and it was all massively impressive. His summing up was done as simply as possible which is great for the jury. It really felt like "how can they not find her guilty". When he talked about any of the consultants he again described when they qualified and their areas of specialty and it was clear to see their lengthy experience which I felt undermined the criticisms made by Myers/Letby regarding competence. When he talked about any of the specialist Registrars he said what their ST level was so again you could understand how long they had been doing the job. He talked about how the defence had disagreed with some of the expert witness findings but it felt to me like Myers' disagreements had come across as pathetic and ridiculous. There was a man sat next to us who hadn't been before but had followed the case closely. He came from the south but was in this area this week. He was a hospital doctor and he indicated to us that he also believed her to be guilty. There was a man in front of me on a laptop, I thought he wasn't police as he wasn't sitting with them. I saw him when I last attended and on that occasion he was doing written notes. Whilst I wasn't able to read anything I did see the NMC logo on his laptop. I hope the summing up continues in this vein but I was more than happy with how the Judge did things today.2 things that stood out the most today, she should never have taken the stand if she wanted to get off with it and 2 Wowzers I’ve not read the write up but in person it was overwhelmingly prosecution heavy, obviously he said some of the defence but with no defence witnesses to quote it didn’t bode well. It was a really good sum up it really brought it all together. Note to self though- more caffeine needed! I listen to everything sped up usually so it’s been hard to concentrate for sooo long. All in all much better start to the week and the atmosphere in general was sooooo much better today! Phew
---
I imagine there’s people just waiting to sell their story and spill all
I must say James Walker’s dogged belief that @Tofino controls everything about Tattle has been one of the most amusing things in the last few monthsFinally grew the balls to open up your platform to new members I see![]()
This is jarring. I only ever pictured Matt Goss in awighat![]()
Hello from another newbie! I've been following along for months and am glad I can now comment. I'm in a couple of Facebook groups but only comment there when I really can't restrain myself. It particularly annoys me when people try to minimise, normalise and excuse the amount of confidential paperwork LL took home and stored. I just find the FB groups insane.
I'll admit I initially thought she couldn't possibly have done what she is accused of as it is too horrific and I did think she was being made a scapegoat, but my mind really changed after the pathologist evidence for baby A (I think) which described the "globules" inside the veins of brain and lung tissue. Then the insulin cases are pretty damning.
I was absolutely shocked that the only defence witness other than LL was a plumber. Just wow! And I've been surprised at what BM has been allowed to say without experts to back it up.
Anyway, the end is in sight and I have faith in the jury. I am looking forward to justice being served.
Long time lurker, FTP. Glad I got the chance to cast my guilty vote today! I think the thing that really sealed the deal for me was the number of babies attacked on their due dates or key milestones. That simply cannot be a coincidence, and it lends enormous weight to the motive of wanting to revel in the parents' distress. Hoping the jury see it the same way!
Been following this thread for a while and wanted to add my input. From the day of hearing about her arrest my gut feeling has been that she is guilty, as difficult as it is to comprehend somebody in the caring profession being capable of something like this. I am a healthcare professional myself and have been involved in numerous emergency situations in hospital with babies/children and cannot think of any that were unexplained and/or unexpected - normally during a resus situation it is either 'expected' due to the patients condition deteriorating or being unstable, or an explanation is found quite quickly following full assessment or further investigations (blood tests etc). The evidence the prosecution have presented has only solidified their case in my opinion and I can't see how she could be innocent.
I hope that the jury make the right decision so that the poor babies and their families get the justice they deserve, although it could never make up for what they have been through. I also hope that her colleagues are getting the support they need as this would undoubtedly be devastating for them to hear evidence that a colleague that they no doubt trusted was actually causing harm.
I think following this case there will be a lot of investigation at CoCH and changes in practice and policies to find out how this went on unnoticed for so long and to prevent this from happening again. I imagine the police will also have to investigate every patient that Letby has ever had direct contact with which will be a mammoth task in itself as during nurse training there are 9 or more placements in different clinical areas and can also be across different trusts depending on where the university uses for placements. Sadly I think there will be more cases to come.
YES. I've not been able to vote before because i've not been able to register. I AM IN. She's guilty guilty, very very guilty.
Thank you to all of you who have made following this case as easy as it could be, by laying out all of the information and for many of your astute reasonings.