freaknasty
Chatty Member
I want to know if the photo she took of the two babies together was for the parents or for her own phone. Because one option is explainable and one is sickening .
I'm 51 and naturally pregnant with my 2nd set of DCDA twins. 1st set I had last Yr at 50.I'd like to disagree.
Spontaneous DCDA (Unidentical twins) are the most common, and falling pregnant as you reach 40 increase your chances of falling pregnant with DCDA twins.
Just to add an alternative point of view.
These parents could very well be IVF recipents, some could carry the hyper ovulation gene, some could be considered geriatric mothers.
No. please don’t. I have a large bunch of IVF friends after undergoing infertility myself for several years. It’s NO excuse.I’m really interested to see if she has fertility issues or something. It would explain a lot. I mean, it wouldn’t make it any better but it would at least give a narrative that my tiny brain can follow.
Yes, I can see that happening… I’m one of those people who go into self loathing mode if something bad happens and could quite easier see myself writing something like that about me. Like, I remember when my daughter was a year old and she fell off the sofa and bumped her head. She was fine. But I’m sure messages I sent my friends would have read “this is my fault/I’m a bad mother/she deserves better” because that’s the kind of person I am. Not standing up for her in any way but it’s an attitude I understand.IF you were to play devils advocate, you could say due to her mental stAte regarding being put on admin duties under suspicion and that the police had been involved and she was arrested, she might have been berating herself as responsible despite not having intentionally killed them.
i imagine the defence will focus on the notes protesting her innocence and asking questions as to how it’s ended up at that point. And that the statements of evil were made in a moment of. despair
I think that's what they are trying to highlight, that she's falsified documents at some point, so potentially at others too.The final feed she gave Child O was after he died?? Am I reading that correctly? Surely her documentation is false.
You are not meant to find someone guilty if there is reasonable doubt. If he DOES cast doubt then that means the prosecution haven't done their job properly of proving she did it beyond a reasonable doubt.The only thing that’s really messing with my head, is what if she is actually guilty but that Ben is really good at casting doubt and she gets away with it![]()
*Fred West has entered the chat*What physical qualities do ‘psychotic’ people have?![]()
Incredibly ridiculously rare especially within neonates/paediatrics. I asked a consultant and they said they’d never seen on in their 40yearsThose is nursing/medical experience - how common is Air Embolism which seems to be given as one of the more common causes of death? Is it something that’s easy to do accidentally?
Don’t think it’s fair to belittle & call someone’s observations pointless. We’re all here to chat & have opinionsSorry but such observations are pretty pointless at this stage - there is going to be 6 months of evidence, including medical evidence. What concrete proof (at this stage) would change your ‘gut feeling’?
Not to jump on you. But the above phrase can be quite hurtful to those of us who have experienced prematurity (**and indeed NICU with a full term baby) and the fear that runs along side it.I think Lucy has mental health issues which perhaps made her behaviours a bit odd and this is why she is being blamed. The babies may have died anyway as they were all premature and needing special care. Do we know for sure that someone murdered them? Lucy does seem obsessive and sometimes - when people are mentally ill - they blame themselves for adverse events and this may explain the notes.
This is so insulting to anyone with bipolar disorder not to mention totally inaccurate... The ramblings of a manic are incoherent, grandiose, often psychotic with random ideas, loose connections, spiritual intonations. Her note is clearly her very distressed and panicking - that is not the same as mentally ill and nothing like manic.Often bi polar lays dormant in a person until something traumatic happens to them and essentially brings it out. Could the trauma of being accused brought out bi polar in Lucy and the note is just that? The ramblings of someone with bi polar on a high. Its scary how much that note reminded me of the person I know with bi polar.