Lucy Letby Case #39

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I can tell you that this is the bane of most medical professionals lives.

The delusion these people have…
I can’t believe the like button is the most popular choice

Lucy not lied once and been consistent throughout?

Ok I can perhaps let them have consistent if they mean she consistently had a selective memory and consistently threw everyone else under the bus.
 
Reactions: 24
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the witness experts aren’t “hired” by the defence/prosecution to fit their version of events are they? BNE didn’t write to Dr Evans and say “aye up pal, can you review these cases so it fits that this nurse Lucy Letby killed the babies?” They will have reviewed the evidence presented to them completely objectively and their findings will either support the defence or the prosecution. In this case, all the expert witnesses clearly supported prosecution because defence didn’t have any! If Dr Evans reviews supported the defence, he’d have been used as a defence expert witness wouldn’t he? Please tell me if I’ve got the wrong end of the stick here
 
Reactions: 21
If she gets found NG, will they still be able to report on other incriminating stuff about her (which had been held back to ensure a fair trial) or will that only get released if she’s found guilty?

other than the 4 doctors, am I right in thinking none of her nursing colleagues were particularly negative about her even though they were witnesses for the prosecution? I know there was one who kept having to ask her to leave but other than that when asked generally what they thought about her nursing abilities and I right in thinking they were nice about her?

I keep trying to read about each baby in the wiki to get my head around the case as a whole but find it too upsetting, especially when I get to the parents accounts.

edit: just to add I think she is guilty! I guess I'm just playing devils advocate in my head as to what might happen if she's found NG..
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 11
At this point I just think these people enjoy the attention of remaining NG because that clearly gives them more attention than it does to actually look at the evidence objectively.
There was no shame in having an opinion of NG and also hoping that she hadn’t done it and it is just one big conspiracy. I understand people wanting it to be the case.
But I’m sorry, you cannot dispute the evidence presented, you have to admit there has been evidence to suggest these were deliberate acts. Might not be enough for you to change (how I don’t know but still)
You cannot say she hasn’t lied. She admitted to lying on the stand herself. That’s not been made up, that’s come out of her own mouth when challenged. If you want to continue to believe she is NG then you do you but don’t make your own reality up.

But imo this isn’t one big conspiracy, this isn’t a hospital covering their failings, this isn’t a “let’s all point fingers at one person”, the evidence have been reviewed repeatedly, there have been no other medical experts called to cast doubt on the findings or to present alternatives because the alternatives have been covered by BM’s cross - there is no one that could have taken the stand to support LL. That is huge. Additionally, there is a lot more evidence that the jury will have had compared to the live reporting.

It’s frustrating and to the person on here letting it creep doubt into you - why? If you’ve followed the trial, followed the evidence, come to your own conclusions why are you letting them potentially sway you? Our opinions don’t really matter in the grand scheme of things but your own opinion is valid. Your own conclusions are valid. There has been huge amounts of evidence presented here that points to her guilt, that follows suit with other health care serial murders, the people on the Fb group are ignoring the evidence and are also choosing not to look at things all together (pencil theory). Don’t doubt yourself because these people shout a bit louder on a group…you’ve heard evidence from multiple medial experts that these deaths cannot be explained by medical reasons, they’re deliberate. She is the only one there for them all. Not to mention everything else. No one is that unlucky.

The entire case is horrendous and yes, putting away an innocent person would be horrendous but I don’t believe her to be innocent. At all. No crack pot on a Fb group is going to add any doubt in for me if the defence didn’t.
 
Reactions: 27
She also believes 20ml of actrapid would have had to be injected. And calls herself a diabetes nurse specialist
 
Reactions: 7
Exactly. He's a twat. And also now you've said that about how good LWH is that's probably why she didn't get to kill babies there, because it was more organised and she didn't get the opportunity?
 
Reactions: 15
I realise it was there already from what I have heard. But, what is strange is her not taking it down and oddly it being the same as the nursery in the hospital where alledged attacks took place. That’s what I’m finding strange and it’s true, it’s the same.

So whilst I personally don’t think living next door to a cemetery is strange in itself, when you put all these pieces together and the fact that there really is quite some possibility that some of the babies were in that memorial garden that’s beyond a coincidence.
 
Reactions: 18
The cigarette thing - I know it’s total trivia but surely what happened was the doctor has nipped off for a smoke and her bleep went off so she legged it back in and as it was an emergency she didn’t think to stop and wash her hands, not that she broke off CPR for a quick gasper?
 
Reactions: 12
sorry if this has already been established, i kind of vaguely followed the trial but i only got super interested when she took to the stand so i'm abit behind.
so the 'gang of four' she accuses of trying to set her up, one of them cant be named for legal reasons for some reason.... this isn't dr choc is it???
 
Reactions: 3
No it’s a female doctor.
 
Reactions: 8
Exactly. He's a twat. And also now you've said that about how good LWH is that's probably why she didn't get to kill babies there, because it was more organised and she didn't get the opportunity?
I will say Liverpool womens is the only neonatal I h e direct experience of. My son was admitted there when he was born. My daughters cousin was on COCH neonatal for a couple of days and no complaints there. But anyway. I never saw half the shit letby was doing at LWs. I’ve commented before about it. But specifically the texting. I never saw a neonatal nurse there using a phone except for taking pics of the babies (once they’d finished touching said baby) which were uploaded directly to the parents,, phone put away, hands washed before moving on to their next task. I cannot even imagine seeing a neonatal nurse texting in a clinical area, nevermind to the extent letby was.
 
Reactions: 18
I’m so bored of the Lucy apologists tbh, remember the crazy woman on twitter? I swear she is getting worse.
 
Reactions: 16
If my child needed CPR urgently I wouldn’t give a fuck if the doctor had the fag hanging out her mouth whilst doing it as long as my baby was okay. She’s so sick in the head and narcissistic that she thinks unwashed hands are worse than her wicked behaviour
 
Reactions: 31
I absolutely agree. She might have dashed back in and quickly donned a pair of latex gloves for speed and you know what this emergency only came about because LL caused it and yet she's the one trying to push the doctor under the bus.
 
Reactions: 22
I absolutely agree. She might have dashed back in and quickly donned a pair of latex gloves for speed and you know what this emergency only came about because LL caused it and yet she's the one trying to push the doctor under the bus.
This has reminded me of when my son was in LWs and the doctor/consultants did their rounds. They got to us, and she was halfway through a sentence and her hospital phone thing went off and she suddenly start running away shouting behind her “I’m sorry there’s someone giving birth in the car park I’ve got to go”

And also, when I first went in and they were doing the initial line observations they do for an hour or so. The woman next to me the midwife closed the curtains and examined her and went “oh yes you’re 3/4cm I’ll go and sort you a room out” came back five minute later and the woman said she couldnt go as the baby was coming, the midwife said “oh no it’s ok, you’re only 3- oh, oh ok. We aren’t going anywhere are we” and the next second there was a baby crying and the dad came out from behind the curtain crying bless him still warms my heart thinking about that.
 
Reactions: 33
Hey never mind websleuths I've said it on here twice now .
 
Reactions: 17
Yeah you’re right. I think they’re there ‘for the court’ but you’d presume BNE would know what the experts are likely to say else why call them up and ask for their expertise. Like you said, BM obviously couldn’t find anyone to suggest otherwise.
 
Reactions: 7
This happened to me my first 3 labours! All 3 times I knew I was ready to push just to be told “you’re only a few centimetres, it’ll be ages yet” The second time it was so fast and large baby (9lb11) I ended up with atonic uterus. Would definitely not recommend!
 
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.