That was me, I read somewhere that her defense say that she searched for many parents not involved in this case. I couldn't understand how she could remember so many names but it would be easy if you have a bag full of paperwork under your bed with them on.There was a poster who was asking whether she used the handover sheets to look up parents. Can't remember the poster but you were 100% correct.
Also, many of us were questioning why she looked up some parents in succession, like what connected them in her mind. BNE has asked the same question. Interesting response - that means she always knew which babies were dead/unwell - but thing is at the time they weren't considered to have been unwell (not until after the review) and LL herself told colleagues she didn't think anything odd or unusual was happening in the ward.....
Mr Johnson turns to the Facebook searches Letby made for parents of children in the indictment. Three searches are made for parents in quick succession. Mr Johnson asks what the link is.
Letby: "They are babies that have died and been seriously unwell."
Letby is asked about another series of searches for three parents' names.
LL: "They are babies that had something significant to them and they were on my mind."
Letby is asked why she didn't give that answer to the police.
LL: "Because I couldn't recall why I had looked at some of them."
Sorry hahaha took a detour was definitely worth it though the guy from Facebook trying to reach tofino and thinking she controlled tattle is hilarious hahahaSlingos got lost....currently liking posts on thread 25.
You can take a horse to water but you can't make him swim![]()
She was saying her knowledge of pancuronium (paralysing agent used to stop a baby tiring itself by fighting the ventilator) was poor yesterday. It seemed really odd to me at the time since she should have known how long it takes to work since she was the person giving it.
Something I’ve read did say “was married” so I’m hoping that’s the case!!I hope for her sake she is no longer his wife. Absolute cunt that he is.
Yes...the cow with the expressive eyebrows said she's going. She's a regular and they've reserved a place for herSo is anyone going tomorrow? Please say yes!
I knew the simpering, cringey toad was a wrong-un! Ugh. Putting chocolate in her locker was the nearest he could get to putting his dick in her without ruining his marriagei fucking knew it!!!! He was married!!! I said this months ago!!! The signs were all bloody there and she’s made this public herself. What an idiot!!!
Cross is meant to be ending tomorrow unfortunately. Writing up my big post nowDoes anyone think it will continue to Monday with the cross? I really want to go!
I will delay preparation for an interview that I have on Tuesday just to go and see it for myself!
ShE CollEcTs PaPerWhy did she ramble on post-it’s and why keep the post-its? I can imagine she wanted to get those thoughts out and on paper but to keep them? They show she was pretty messed up.
I always had the ick of him for this reason. Especially when he was talking about his children to her. I just had a suspicion he must be married.i fucking knew it!!!! He was married!!! I said this months ago!!! The signs were all bloody there and she’s made this public herself. What an idiot!!!
I think that was what she claimed and the Big Nick Energy said “do you want me to play the video” swoon. I’m really gonna miss that guyThe Guardian are saying she was arrested in a Lee Cooper leisure suit over her nightie. We need the video footage!
Exactly what I was thinking - he will not want this to be ground for an appeal, and better to be conservative and assume a mistake was made that can be admitted to and not impact her case. It's a technicality now anyway that she has already disputed it on the stand.I don't think he would - not sure ow much she can speak/communicate her annoyance to the team - but if she's kicked off about it/the cross exam and one of the defence team have admitted that she may - at some point, in perhaps a passing comment? - have mentioned that she didn't agree with the phonecall evidence, and they haven't pursued that - perhaps they've been backed into it?
And he's admitted mistake now to ensure a retrial is avoided, as he's doubting (or has always doubted) her innocence and so he's defending her in the way of ensuring she has a fair trial, not so she walks free (bit like one of his previous horrendous cases, Jordan Monaghan?)
Telling how Sky has this extra bit -
Letby's defence, Ben Myers KC, says it was a "mistake" that this evidence was agreed before the court, but says it was a legitimate line of questioning for Nick Johnson KC to have taken.
Again, perhaps so it's agreed by defence that this was a legitimate line of questioning and so avoids her being able to bring it up for appeal grounds? Hope that all makes sense!
Digressing to be flippant, wouldn't it be lovely to support someone's paper collection by sending postcards to them in prison of all the places they will never see ever ever again
There are no coincidences in my opinion. That program, the course she’d just done, the book on her bedside about baby death, the house looking on to the cemetery.Yep! I know people were saying that the episode being about air embolism was just a coincidence but I don’t think it was