Lucyxxxx
VIP Member
I mean Neame is like an exotic version of Noname.Ooooh imagine if Dr Matthew Neame was Dr Noname and they’ve published his name by mistake!
I mean Neame is like an exotic version of Noname.Ooooh imagine if Dr Matthew Neame was Dr Noname and they’ve published his name by mistake!
She's just making herself look ridiculous. Everyone can see that apart from her.Oh god now she’s saying Baby H’s dad is lying too in his evidence which was agreed facts about no SHO being present and no collapse. And again the SHO is lying too about not being present.
This is just like baby E! Where she denies the parents’ claims and places the SHO at the scene but SHO hasn’t made a note of it and doesn’t remember it. So another parent and SHO and “multiple doctors” are all lying??
WTAF am I listening to???
I honestly don't think osamas face looks kind?????![]()
I've always believed her to be guilty too. A lot of the medical/clinical questioning in court can lose me but fortunately there are a lot of Tattlers who are clinically trained and explain things which is brilliant for me and gives me a better understanding. I hope there is someone on that jury who has training and can help the other jurors to have a good understanding and I hope they are a very sensible group of people. However before I'd even heard about Tattle I still thought she was guilty. Being at every incident 22 times and nobody else there more than 7 times and many less than 7 was the first indicator of guilt for me and the expert witnesses concluding harm was done was the next indicator. Masses more things have come out during the trial which has strengthened my belief in her guilt, however I do feel a bit anxious that she might be found NG. It's all down to those 12 individuals. My hubby has done jury service 3 times and on one he was foreman of the jury. None of the cases were anywhere near as serious as this one but he was astounded that some of the jury were reluctant to find one man guilty who was clearly guilty as they didn't like sending him to prison. Fortunately they did find him guilty and my hubby said the legal people were very glad about the jury's decision as it later emerged he'd done a lot of bad things previously which the jury didn't know about at the time. Hubby said the trial he was at could have gone either way even though the man was, as he put it, "guilty as sin". I don't think I will be able to feel totally comfortable about this trial until a guilty verdict is announced even though almost all Tattlers believe her to be guilty and more and more on Reddit as well. I can only imagine how nerve wracking all this must be for the parents and all the staff she previously worked with and for their sake I hope the guilty verdict comes and life in prison.Will the jury have any kind of guidance to reach a verdict? I worry that quite a few things that show she’s guilty will get overlooked, that some of the lies won’t be noticed by them.. I wouldn’t notice half of the inconsistencies if it wasn’t for you lot!
She knows she cannot dispute mum's phone call at 9.11 so she now says she cannot know the content of the phone call. She is one arrogant obnoxious bitch. Her colleagues must detest her for trying to blame them and try to label them incompetent to try to wriggle out of her heinous crimes.Morning all. Another beautiful sunny morning that Lucy Letby won’t get to enjoy
Read back the statements for baby E. It’s quite clear the two calls dad received are 1) at 9.11 mum being worried about blood round babies mouth and dad saying it’s fine don’t worry and 2) a second call that’s timed nearly at 11pm which was a mixture of his wife and the midwife saying “get here right away”
There’s also the very niggling issue that Letby says she called the senior health officer to report bleeding but he can’t remember any call and says he would have acted on it and put it in his notes. There’s also the fact that Dr Harkness was around at the time so she could have raised anything with him but didn’t.
It’s not a simple case of mum getting in a muddle. Whole conversations and interactions had to have never happened the way both parents remember it and how all the timings line up to show prosecution are right in what they think happened and why.
I’ve also thought that the way mum describes the blood pattern around baby E’s mouth is what baby would get if they had been bleeding and then had a breathing support mask put on. She did something horrible to that baby I’m sure of it.
They won't follow me, they are too busy picking out engagement rings for Letby
If I was her on that stand and someone was asking me such awful questions (and I was innocent) I wouldn't just reply no or I don't agree, it's free speech (to a degree) bloody say something emotive or more than just a plain no! I'd be wailing, insisting along the lines of "no, I would never harm anyone let alone a premature baby! It's making me sick just thinking about it" idk maybe I'm dramatic
So much worse when said by the voice on the podcast!!Mine was on day 1 of cross. 'In a bin bag in your garage'
Definitely feels personal. It’s like she knows she’s fucked so she’s trying to ruin everyone else too.I just don’t get what she is trying to achieve?
The jury only need to have reasonable doubt to find her not guilty so is that why she's naming and shaming every single staff member?
Or is she angry that they've all dropped her like a fly once she was arrested for murdering babies?
It's beyond madness now.
Very interesting take on it all... I've sat and read the court reporting before and wouldn't be surprised if we got a grand dramatic confession, so wanting to drag this out then confess in her own way...
Sorry I missed the Les Dennis references... does he have a kind face?!
And now fucking Glitter!
I don't know how he was first in this thread, but Poor Les needs better PR!