At this point I’m so convinced of her guilt that someone else could stand up and say it was them and I’d still think it was Lucy. BM has a really big job on his hands to even get a niggle of doubt in to my mind.
100% same for me too (shocker). Especially as Letby is continuously linking it to herself
two of her babies and now this she says to Noname.. it’s her own words saying they’re her babies and her that’s there, multiple people talking to her about it being her again, bad run, can’t believe you were on again.
I think everybody would have to accept that’s the case as Letby does. So then the events have to be incredibly rare and unusual presentation, coincidence on an astronomical scale (parents and multiple witnesses describing it how they do as a huge one), strange chance that they happen to her just after treatment, after parents just left, she’s found on her own, babies not responding or having presentations never seen before, the air..
I don’t believe that’s all bad luck on it’s own but then to also add the supporting evidence, fb searches that she can’t explain, medical notes taken that help describe the picture of overall health for the baby, the note, the forging initials in notes etc
What I find interesting is there have been multiple thorough investigations into the deaths and unexplainable collapses, the Liverpool women’s doc being the first one to suggest involving police. Many of them were actively invited and started by the practitioners that BM is trying to suggest are incompetent and potentially to blame. If they were trying to cover up terrible medical negligence they were going about it in a very bizarre way. Yet none of the investigations have found the practice was to blame or medical negligence a cause, there were pointers for improvement of course but none found anything to explain what was happening (after one nurses involvement
).
A fine tooth comb that has gone over every element of the hospital practice and thrown up imo a fairly typical looking picture, no doubt a picture that has to be fairly similar to previous years and those since.
I don’t see how a vague idea of “the unit was chaotic” is enough to create plausible reasonable doubt in a case loaded with physical evidence of actual harm and that on every occasion there is a highly unlikely scenario where it’s all innocent and chance. There is still a poisoner to be accounted for that this is somehow all unrelated to!
The pathologist summed it up perfectly with his analogy and what I’ve tried to say but never been able to put it as well as him! It’s possible (many things are) but is it probable? IMO absolutely not.
) I’m guessing. Which is fair enough, hope they are all having a break from the horrors of the case tbf. If any of our roving reporters want to go though 
