I think if it was factual and had been heard in the courtroom that they were in a relationship then it would be reported so
but maybe it’s not been brought in as evidence from either side but I’d have thought it would be fairly relevant if he was a former partner. I would have thought factually it might say their messages continued but aren’t relevant rather than specify “social and work related”
I guess they wouldn’t say “their messages were then cockington pics and shower dildo related”
I just don’t get any sense they were hot and steamy- baby deaths and his own kids just seem like the ultimate passion kill. Just seems like he’s getting pleasure from being mr cringe “promise me won’t you” and she’s enjoying the sympathy and attention. Icky AF either way.