Why must they have doubts?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The thing is, twins are much more likely to be born prematurely compared with single babies, so it’s not surprising that there are a lot of multiples in a NICU.
Some sort of deranged obsession over these families seems apparent
Regarding the patient assignment, this is not a rigid rule. When a nurse is tasked with a certain room/patient/ward she/he is not supposed to ignore if a patient assigned to another nurse is needing help and his/her assigned nurse is not available. So, this argument that “she was not supposed to be with Baby C” is totally irrelevant. It sounds like someone failed to attend to the baby’s needs and is passing on the bucket. So far, I haven’t read any article that single out this nurse. And the fact she was working alone in a neonatal unit at any point, it’s simply hospital failure. She has so many arguments to win this case and get a large compensation if it keeps going on like this. They are all in it, up to the gob.
Because experts witnesses are experts within their profession. So their opinion, based on their experience, is to be treated as fact and trusted. The defence will use the natural cause possibility probably but my understanding of what is being said then the possibility of it occurring naturally is quite slim. You don't need a post mortem report because the expert witness evidence is enough if that makes sense.
Jury sent home for the day
Surely monitors don't just get switched off by accident?
Agreed.
I’ve been chatting to colleagues about this today, and most people have admitted to Facebook or social media “stalking” a variety of people on occasions for various reasons (as also demonstrated by people on this thread including myself who will admit to “Facebook stalking”).
Half the jury will be thinking “oh that’s a bit weird” and half will be thinking “well tit, I do that too, what’s the big deal?”.
ours on the NICU in Newcastle were checked very regularly by nurses and health care assistants. The monitor is what allerted everyone to my sons respiratory arrest so they were always turned on day in day out.
They need to state those notes proving the nurse is lying then don't they?
Facebook stalking is normal but looking at the mothers of 2 dead babies and one who has permanent brain damage is perhaps a big deal
Why would the first thing you think of doing after a baby is collapsing is looking for it’s mother on Facebook?
I know people have a nosey on Facebook but why would you search the child’s parents after a bad incident and then search previous babies that died . It seems strange to me like i Could maybe understand that babies parents but then two minutes later search child E mum who caught you supposedly killing her baby . Nah that’s to much sorry but I don’t see any valid reason why’s he would do that if she’s innocent
That is weird tbh. Like, strange. The thing is, she can argue that she wanted to see how babies were doing etc, but every single one? Weird.
From what is being presented either a monster was at work or babies and Mothers were being seriously failed by incompetency at an unusually high level. Which is very worrying.
The latest evidence on the Facebook activity seems very clear that she was looking for some kind of kick out of seeing the families she had damaged.
Mr Johnson: "The practice of the nurses on the NNU was to use the NGT to check whether an infant had an empty stomach before feeding. That was done in Child G’s case – nothing came up which means there was nothing in her stomach.
"She was then fed and her designated nurse went on a break. 15 minutes later Child G produced projectile vomits of such force that they left the cot and landed on the floor and nearby chair.
This is just so upsetting to think that those nurses were celebrating the baby improving, and one of their colleagues were there allegedly undoing all their work and actually sabotaging things.
Attachments
IF she was guilty that would be the case. Baffled why people aren't waiting for more evidence to determine guilt
But I'm sure it's not parents of recently deceased babies in their care
I wonder did she search parents of other children that didn’t have any issues . I find it strange she even searched the families especially after each episode and then look at previous families two minutes later . Was she worrying that the parents was suspecting her so she went back to look at child E parents to see if they had said anything . She could have been paranoid and that’s why she was Stalking them
- Status