You have to hope that the jury are all following and understanding these things well. When you don’t have a medical background I’d imagine that’s daunting. I am a professional in social care but I would have no idea about these medical aspects.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I am concerned she's charged with murdering a child who had no post mortem take place and an expert has said they can't 100% rule out natural causes.
That’s extremely high level of insulin , I dont At all think that’s anything to do with hospital failings
But... how can anyone take it as fact, if no PM was done? You can't say either way surely? If prosecution can use it as face despite no PM, surely defence can use no PM?
EXACTLY. 'We the prosecution want you to take this experts word for it despite no PM and despite them saying they can't rule out natural causes.' Baffling
Interestingly, at the end of this part of the interview she asked whether the police had access to the TPN bag that she had connected," Mr Johnson added
Why would she be asking where the used bag was, was it because she was worried they would have definite proof it had been tampered with ??
Why would she be asking where the used bag was, was it because she was worried they would have definite proof it had been tampered with ??
I don’t see how she can be convicted of this one even if she is guilty
The defence will 100% use that. i can see her only being convicted of 2 or 3, if that. The evidence is piss poor so far, FB stalking and vague texts mean absolutely nothing.
Maybe? Or maybe to probe she'd done nothing?
sorry if this has been said (can’t keep up) but re the Facebook searches, the thing that would make these incriminating would be if Lucy ONLY searched for the families of the babies she is accused of killing.
If there were other babies who died while she was on shift that she never looked up OR if she looked up other babies who died that she had no contact with, that would seem less suspicious? Like she just had a fascination with looking up those who’d lost children, not those she murdered.
Don’t know if that makes sense.
If there were other babies who died while she was on shift that she never looked up OR if she looked up other babies who died that she had no contact with, that would seem less suspicious? Like she just had a fascination with looking up those who’d lost children, not those she murdered.
Don’t know if that makes sense.
It is QUOTE poor to be honest. I'm so confused. I'd be absolutely fuming if I was told the prosecution were basically using a 'possibility' as evidence.
That’s a super interesting question. Thriving off their attention / being the saviour or did she run off and watch from afar! Intrigued.
(If guilty of course. I’m in camp don’t know)
She did, it was her friends brother, he was found by chance and survived. She also poured bleach in the poor lads bed.
She also poisoned the family dog (beleive it survived).
I would have thought a lot of what we've heard so far inadmissable. Personally I think it's likely she did it but if this is all they have - their main point is that she was present at every death. This could STILL be argued as circumstantial and could easily be used in a defence arguing she was set up - it's just not good enough. There's no concrete evidence so far, no DNA, no CCTV, no direct admittance. If she gets found not guilty, I would not be surprised. Sounds like the whole hospital and even trust was really corrupt and incompetent, allowing all this to happen.
Nothing is recorded about who kept an eye on child G while their nurse went on an hours break 
Just catching up, this is unfathomable given the mortality rate was surely going up and the adverse incidents/near misses also. This evidence has nearly broken me, that poor baby, and I'm sure the mother must relive that encounter with LL that night. Devastating. I have to say at this stage I'm beginning to wonder if LL will take the stand at all. I'm doubting it.
Where are you seeing the updates?
Serious failings on this unit, very serious.Nothing is recorded about who kept an eye on child G while their nurse went on an hours break
Unless they have exhumed? Guess we will find out when they actually start presenting evidence.
Wonder if there is a pattern to those dates. Once a month but why THOSE dates?
look at judith moritz on twitter, shes live tweeting
- Status