I'm not sure what's so hard to understand what
@slingo16 is trying to say - basically the prosecution are standing up there and saying IN NO DOUBT this child was poisoned by insulin, it's so indisputable by the c-peptide levels etc etc etc - BUT - these blood results came back how long ago? And were left unnoticed for such a period of time that more babies were hurt.
If I'm understanding correctly, the
argument question being raised here is how can they be so SURE now, when back then, it didn't get taken any further?