Sorry I mean the blood and cpeptide level, the same readings as this baby?Yes, but I think the machine used could only record a maximum reading of 500.
The baby’s reading reached that level but who knows how much higher it could have been?
Oops! Am I wrong on that? Might have to re-read the wiki.
Yes, the blood and c-peptide were grossly abnormal. I think some blood had been stored for this baby, for another purpose, but hadn’t been discarded so an insulin test was done retrospectively.Sorry I mean the blood and cpeptide level, the same readings as this baby?
Thanks, just bought it for Kindle!For anyone bored over the weekend, I'm enjoying this novel about medical murders in a London hospital.View attachment 1762308 Only 20 per cent through it. It's by a former doctor and feels almost like a true crime book rather than fiction.
Me too....i agree , hope jury have more clear info or looks like she will get away with this one.. but, as I say, I'm lost, so I could be wrong!Fellas, all this bag stuff has left me completely bamboozled! I do not understand who did/didnt do what at what time, hope to god the jury arent as baffled as I am!
You are going to love it! I've read a bit further and it has c-peptidesThanks, just bought it for Kindle!
BA killed babies with insulin at levels of 47,000 odd so depends, I’d say lucy didn’t want to initially kill the baby But cause a drama to then go on tokill themI’m so confused as to how insulin levels could continue to be high / glucose levels low just from contaminated lines if the bag had been replaced. Or; are they saying that the insulin levels potentially had been much higher, but when the blood was drawn it was 4,765? Can someone survive levels higher than that?!
I agree we need to hear from the pharmacists. Is it possible they were contaminated there? I did mention this before.It looks like there was a prescription for three bags..!?
View attachment 1762918View attachment 1762919Baby L was also given insulin through a dextrose bag feed which was prepared by Letby. Her explanation was it must have been in one of the bags already being received.
I think we should hear from the pharmacists?
View attachment 1762935I’m confused but I think they had a stock of 3-4 bags for baby f.
Hopefully with Paddington bear holding her hand walking into prisonHow long til someone from FB does one of those angel wings edits of Lucy?
I don’t think that’s the case. It sound like there were prescriptions for 3 48 hour bags but only one (bag 1) was made up.It looks like there was a prescription for three bags..!?
View attachment 1762918View attachment 1762919Baby L was also given insulin through a dextrose bag feed which was prepared by Letby. Her explanation was it must have been in one of the bags already being received.
I think we should hear from the pharmacists?
View attachment 1762935I’m confused but I think they had a stock of 3-4 bags for baby f.
Unlikely given the same thing happened to another baby months later, who was also a twin (baby L and M), whose twin is also alleged to have been had an air embolus like baby E. What are the statistical chances of the pharmacy, accidentally or deliberately, poisoning another baby with those same circumstances as baby F?I agree we need to hear from the pharmacists. Is it possible they were contaminated there? I did mention this before.
Re reading this, I think the bag LL put up at 00.35 was stopped being given by central line and just changed to peripheral line as req by docs on the morning shift. Then because of changes to baby F condition. A new bespoke bag started at 4pm.It looks like there was a prescription for three bags..!?
View attachment 1762918View attachment 1762919Baby L was also given insulin through a dextrose bag feed which was prepared by Letby. Her explanation was it must have been in one of the bags already being received.
I think we should hear from the pharmacists?
View attachment 1762935I’m confused but I think they had a stock of 3-4 bags for baby f.
Well that clears that up then she could have quite easily contaminated all three bags for baby f at once ! Thanks candylandIt looks like there was a prescription for three bags..!?
View attachment 1762918View attachment 1762919Baby L was also given insulin through a dextrose bag feed which was prepared by Letby. Her explanation was it must have been in one of the bags already being received.
I think we should hear from the pharmacists?
View attachment 1762935I’m confused but I think they had a stock of 3-4 bags for baby f.
BA give the insulin poisoned child a massive dose by a single injection.BA killed babies with insulin at levels of 47,000 odd so depends, I’d say lucy didn’t want to initially kill the baby But cause a drama to then go on tokill them
Ahh right okayI don’t think that’s the case. It sound like there were prescriptions for 3 48 hour bags but only one (bag 1) was made up.
As the TPN bags have a shelf life of 48hrs they would be made up as necessary using the already written prescriptions.
I really don’t think that would be the case. It would be an aseptic TPN facility so why would insulin be there? As it is not used in the unit it would have to be maliciously introduced.Are people now saying insulin was put in the bag in an aseptic unit? We’re going round in circles here
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?