This is why the Facebook lot are so bizarre. If you want to say "it could have been someone else" then fair enough, but "it had to be someone else it can't have been Lucy" - why not? What insider info do you have that exonerates her? Maybe pass it over to her defence....So Facebook people are saying it is foul play but not Lucy . A nurse has mixed it up but not Lucy .
seems it’s everybody else’s fault but Lucy
let’s just say she didn’t kill the babies then why are people blaming everybody else but Lucy ?
They're f*cking bonkers, like this wasn't a consideration at the very outset of the investigation....seriously they boil my piss!So Facebook people are saying it is foul play but not Lucy . A nurse has mixed it up but not Lucy .
seems it’s everybody else’s fault but Lucy
let’s just say she didn’t kill the babies then why are people blaming everybody else but Lucy ?
I mean at the start of the investigation they wouldn’t pick Lucy it would have taken a long time for them to see she was only one at the collapses and things stopped when she was on admin etc .They're f*cking bonkers, like this wasn't a consideration at the very outset of the investigation....seriously they boil my piss!
There's an apparent very highly qualified and seemingly knowledgeable nicu nurse on there defending her to the hilt too...
im not an expert, and I struggled to wrap my head around this but I posted a possible theory on this yesterday. I’ll find it and share my thoughts with you.Can any medical people help to clarify - the level of insulin in baby F was 4,657, and in the case of one of Beverly Allitts victims, it was recorded as 43,147 (and said to be a full adult syringe).
What volume of insulin would be needed to get a reading of the lower level? What syringe sizes/vial sizes does insulin come in?
the number of units aren’t relevant here ie not like saying she gave 10mg diamorphine.Can any medical people help to clarify - the level of insulin in baby F was 4,657, and in the case of one of Beverly Allitts victims, it was recorded as 43,147 (and said to be a full adult syringe).
What volume of insulin would be needed to get a reading of the lower level? What syringe sizes/vial sizes does insulin come in?
I have to agree. IMO she was wanting to be with people when the bad news came in. She wanted to know desperately what was happening with baby F because usually she has a front row seat to the chaos she causes and I think it was hard for her not to have that with this method but she knew she couldn’t kill the twins in the same way. The fact the dose next time is larger still is very telling. Why was he such a worry to her and the “oh dear” comment when she wasn’t even there and was receiving relatively good news about him. I’ll be interested to see her reaction to the other insulin poisoned baby.Yes I think the salsa texts were exactly that.
Exactly she comes across in the texts like she is upset over the babies or wanting to see how they are doing . But she left her own designated child even the nurse higher than her told her off over it so she clearly wasn’t just a nice nurse who really cared for her patients .I’d also like to know if she was texting for updates for other babies or just the ones she’s accused of harming.
She wasn’t interested when her designated baby needed closer observations during Baby Cs collapses.
This has been suggested a few times, I fully agree. She was sitting waiting on updatesI also wonder if Lucy’s texts at Salsa was her waiting for news of his collapse.
One of the most chilling things I’ve read todayThe NICU team saved this babies life from one of their own. It’s unbelievable.
Was with my close nurse friend today and apart from saying she was shattered that was as much work chat as she was after. I didn’t text my colleagues about the children I worked with constantly if much at all and I was having to do work at home all the time! They are often telling her to switch offI can honestly say I have never text any collegues after work the amount she does that is about work .
we talk about other stuff like an event one of us is attending or a work party coming up or just a general how’s things are you on shift with me tomorrow .
her texts are always work related she’s obsessed and it’s chilling when you read them now knowing she could have killed those babies . I bet her work friends kick themselves that they missed the signs looking back they probably do think it’s odd . They already was saying she had a bad run and we ain’t even on the last child we have 10 more to go. She was definitely wanting updates on baby F .
Exactly she comes across in the texts like she is upset over the babies or wanting to see how they are doing . But she left her own designated child even the nurse higher than her told her off over it so she clearly wasn’t just a nice nurse who really cared for her patients .
I’m pretty sure there was some texting with the other insulin baby, and I’m sure there was texting with other babies too. There’s a couple coming up that weren’t her designated babies but she was in meddling again with themI’d also like to know if she was texting for updates for other babies or just the ones she’s accused of harming.
She wasn’t interested when her designated baby needed closer observations during Baby Cs collapses.
Oh dear, what a comment for a baby that’s improving, that anyone else would be delighted to hear is improving. Ugh she’s honestly so sick. When you actually sit and think of it like thatI have to agree. IMO she was wanting to be with people when the bad news came in. She wanted to know desperately what was happening with baby F because usually she has a front row seat to the chaos she causes and I think it was hard for her not to have that with this method but she knew she couldn’t kill the twins in the same way. The fact the dose next time is larger still is very telling. Why was he such a worry to her and the “oh dear” comment when she wasn’t even there and was receiving relatively good news about him. I’ll be interested to see her reaction to the other insulin poisoned baby.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?