Do you know what I don't think I could handle hearing her speak at this point, gives me shiversI think the defence will revisit them, equally, if we hear from Letby. I hope we do hear from Letby!
Do you know what I don't think I could handle hearing her speak at this point, gives me shiversI think the defence will revisit them, equally, if we hear from Letby. I hope we do hear from Letby!
I’m not sure, the prosecution mentioned a fourth medical expert for child a in the opening statement (I think it was an independent pathologist) but we’ve not heard anything from that. Prosecution also told the jury that they would hear more about police interviews later, as we only got an agreed summary yesterday. And of course defence need their turn. We’ve probably heard the bulk of it though.Just catching up with today.
Is that all we will hear about baby's A and B or will they revisit later?
Just to say this is 100% spot on. We cannot assume she had no childhood trauma just because it "appears" outwardly that she comes from a background of relative privilege.We don’t know what her childhood was like so it’s a lot to assume she had no trauma. I think I said on a previous thread that assumptions are probably made because her parents are together and holding hands that she had a good upbringing. My comments are nothing personal to them but that tells us nothing at all, we know nothing about them.
My parents have been married 40+ years but we are an incredibly dysfunctional family due to my mothers controlling nature and addictions and my dad enabling her. Childhood emotional neglect is incredibly damaging and a lot more common than people realise. From the outside my parents probably look like a stable married couple!
There could also be something that happened in her past, unrelated to her parents that caused childhood trauma.
If guilty, I can see no other explanation. I refuse to believe anyone is born evil. For me people are a product of their environment.Even if you're not old enough to remember, adoption trauma and disruption to early attachment can cause issues.
The trauma for a later personality disorder isn't necessarily 'big' trauma, obviously it's very significant for the person but we all have different personalities and differences in resilience, people can go through something horrendous and never develop a PD, some people develop one after bullying at school. For some patients we never find out what the trauma was.
Sorry to hear you had a difficult childhood.We don’t know what her childhood was like so it’s a lot to assume she had no trauma. I think I said on a previous thread that assumptions are probably made because her parents are together and holding hands that she had a good upbringing. My comments are nothing personal to them but that tells us nothing at all, we know nothing about them.
My parents have been married 40+ years but we are an incredibly dysfunctional family due to my mothers controlling nature and addictions and my dad enabling her. Childhood emotional neglect is incredibly damaging and a lot more common than people realise. From the outside my parents probably look like a stable married couple!
There could also be something that happened in her past, unrelated to her parents that caused childhood trauma.
Oh yeah she might not have done, it’s just I’ve seen people assume she had no trauma when we’ve heard nothing in court about her childhood. We don’t know anything so I think it’s a strange assumption to make.Sorry to hear you had a difficult childhood.
I agree, but I think we’re all born with different traits/personalities. I know (or think) my kids were.
It’s the old nature/nurture debate but I don’t necessarily think she had to have suffered any trauma.
The only thing obvious is that she may have been put on a pedestal.
There's a lot of different motives that make people do the things they do. Wayne Couzens didn't have any diagnosed personality disorder and no reason provided - they mentioned mild depression and money worries, neither of which explain why he kidnapped, grape and killed a woman one day. He's in prison for life and we still don't know what his motive was - was it sex, power, mental breakdown, psychopathy, boredom - who knows.While not important for the conviction, the motive is still important for me to move away from not guilty. Most of our behaviours have a function and murders a motive.
When excluding the typical murder motives (material gain, love, lust, revenge etc.) it only really leaves some mental health issue.
A poster the other day listed the mental health conditions that can lead to a NG by insanity plea, which it would appear LL does not have. That only really leaves some sort of personality disorder, which is often associated with trauma in childhood. I just don’t see that here (unless as someone suggested she was adopted and was old enough to remember it).
WC had a different motive- sex. You can see in that situation what he gained from the actsThere's a lot of different motives that make people do the things they do. Wayne Couzens didn't have any diagnosed personality disorder and no reason provided - they mentioned mild depression and money worries, neither of which explain why he kidnapped, grape and killed a woman one day. He's in prison for life and we still don't know what his motive was - was it sex, power, mental breakdown, psychopathy, boredom - who knows.
LL could be a sociopath of some sort - they don't all hurt animals and grow up in terrible families. It can mean just a lack of empathy. She wanted excitement, to fill a void in her life, to feel important, and a lack of empathy could mean she saw the babies as just instruments to get her this. Like those runners who knock down other runners in a bid to finish first - they're so focused on winning, they forget it's other people they're hurting. She wanted attention and excitement so badly, she forgot she was hurting babies.
LL could have disliked the parents - and thought they didn't deserve their babies. And killing the babies meant she was protecting them from what she saw as a terrible life with their parents.
LL could have had some personality disorder or delusions where she genuinely thought she was doing God's work or something like that - by killing the children, she thought she was saving them from pain or disability.
Human beings are so complex. There's not always an easy response especially for serial killers.
We don't know that. grape is not about sex most of the time. It's about power and control. It could be a personality disorder. Rapists don't all kidnap and murder either.WC had a different motive- sex
He could have just paid for a prostitute. Even one who would be willing, for money, to indulge his, possible, stranger peccadilloes.WC had a different motive- sex. You can see in that situation what he gained from the acts
My point is there is a tangible gain from the act, with kidnap and murder (secondary acts) a potential way to reduce being caught. Power and control can still be a sexual motive too, especially when associated with sexual acts.We don't know that. grape is not about sex most of the time. It's about power and control. It could be a personality disorder. Rapists don't all kidnap and murder either.
grape does not equal sex as a motive that is.
What did he gain? There are straight men who grape other men - not because they enjoy the sex but because it's intimidation or punishment (happens as part of gang initiations sometimes).WC had a different motive- sex. You can see in that situation what he gained from the acts
I think I read he used prostitutes but had a load of werid urges and then money worries so couldn’t pay for them anymore.WC had a different motive- sex. You can see in that situation what he gained from the acts
Sexual gratificationWhat did he gain?
Which for me isn’t enough of a motive, unless there is a disorder of the mind.And if we use your logic, we can see what LL gained - a lot of attention, more interesting cases than the boring ones she complained about and being able to show her parents how important her job was.
Whst a strange take. Sex isn’t the only valid motive for crime. People do it for all sorts of reasons and often not even all that extreme. She could literally just be devoid of empathy and was bored.Sexual gratification
Which for me isn’t enough of a motive, unless there is a disorder of the mind.
Were you in the car with him to know if he felt sexual gratification? Or do you just assume a man who kidnaps a woman and rapes her does so for sexual gratification? That's the point - grape does not equal sexual gratification just because it's a sexual act. I mean you realise there's people who like strangling their victims because THAT gives them sexual satisfaction. So even if they don't grape them, the motivation might be sexual.Sexual gratification
Which for me isn’t enough of a motive, unless there is a disorder of the mind.
Wanted to add (but this is derailing- apologies) that his motive was also not getting caught. I think that was in the summing up at his sentencing, that he’d realised she could go on to identify him if he let her go after raping her and so to him he ‘had’ to murder her. Utterly vileWhat did he gain? There are straight men who grape other men - not because they enjoy the sex but because it's intimidation or punishment (happens as part of gang initiations sometimes).
And if we use your logic, we can see what LL gained - a lot of attention, more interesting cases than the boring ones she complained about and being able to show her parents how important her job was.