Lol. We've been in our new build 4 yrs and finally just finishing the yard. And yes, if they top seed and fertilize the grass, it could grow back. She's so clueless.
who’s sharing this?
Snoozie Bonaldi (aka Hello October)
There's been a bit of buzz on Instagram about Tattle because an influencer (sorry I don't know who she is) posted screenshots of her thread on here and people were discussing her weight. Lucy Moon, Anna Eleri Hart and a few others all posted about it yesterday.
Aw maan, I was looking forward for flying cars and hologram chats in 2020. We've got global warming, wildfires, a pandemic and a horde of incompetent fools begging their way through life instead
I understand why some people might take issue with sites like Tattle but a change.org petition? Please. Personally, I have never posted a ‘hate’ comment on someone’s Instagram, Twitter etc. nor DMd them. If they want to see what I think of them, they would have to come searching for it here. I don’t understand what the difference is between Tattle and the comments section on Daily Mail. I don’t see many petitions from influenzas about hate that actual celebrities receive. It’s always, always about them.
most people don’t see the tagged companies as a beg said:
Yeah, I leaned about this type of forums when some inffluencers were complaining about the hate and all I found there (GG) was people talking about all the shady things they did. I remember Estee Lalonde constantly talking about gifts they got from friends during the holiday season, and realizing there that the nutribullet wasn't from an actual friend but if was an undisclosed Pr gift. Once you see how you hide the adds, you see all their crappy practices and these forums are awesome to talk all the other scummy things some influencers are doing.
She also wants someone else to do the work.
My issue with influencers arguing that they provide “free content” is that sites exist where they can easily get followers to sign up and pay for the same content, like Patreon. The problem is is that no one would actually pay for this content because it’s not good and it doesn’t add value. The other thing is that their engagement will be WAAAAAY less than on IG, so they know they have to keep their content free and accessible so they can attract brands. And viewers PAY THEIR SALARIES by engaging and shopping through their links. They ARE getting paid.
Just want to add one more thing...a lot of the more “ethical” influencers are slowly transitioning to a paid subscriber model like Patreon because they’re no longer okay with accepting paid partnerships with crappy brands (even the ones who say they’re “sustainable”). To make up for the inevitable lost revenue, they’re putting up a pay wall. And this, to me, is totally fair. I subscribe to a few influencers this way, but these women are also writing about more than just fashion - they have opinions and fact-based arguments and can see (and write eloquently about) the links between fashion, the environment, oppression, poverty, etc etc.
Why is Rich 'banned' from working out on it? How awful not to be able to use an outside space you have and have to go somewhere away from home, especially when you have a job and baby and might be wanting to snatch a quick workout.
And I wonder how many tattle threads these folk have (not many to none I would guess).
