And what’s the betting the fucker will start a crowdfund to pay for that?He won't go to prison, because almost no one would in that situation if its a first offence.
He'll most likely get a suspended sentence and a fine if he's found guilty.
Good. I'm no fan of Narinder and think she is a huge tit stirrer but what he did was disgusting. I'm guessing he will likely only get a slap on the wrist rather than the punch in the gob he deserves.
Glad he's your ex. What a wick.Doesn’t say he took it does it? So is there some creep working with her, taking these photos? Or is sharing it the crime they can be charged with?
wtf is wrong with men?
When I split with someone I found out they’d taken surreptitious photos of my cleavage many times, and sent them to their mates. He mentioned it in a ‘hahaha I did this and you never knew’ way. I was so shocked I underreacted and was speechless. I wish I’d lost my tit at him.
it was an old pap photo he sharedDoesn’t say he took it does it? So is there some creep working with her, taking these photos? Or is sharing it the crime they can be charged with?
wtf is wrong with men?
When I split with someone I found out they’d taken surreptitious photos of my cleavage many times, and sent them to their mates. He mentioned it in a ‘hahaha I did this and you never knew’ way. I was so shocked I underreacted and was speechless. I wish I’d lost my tit at him.
BBC News app says that both taking and sharing the photo are offences. So by sharing it Fox committed a criminal offence and, if found guilty, will have it on his record.Doesn’t say he took it does it? So is there some creep working with her, taking these photos? Or is sharing it the crime they can be charged with?
wtf is wrong with men?
When I split with someone I found out they’d taken surreptitious photos of my cleavage many times, and sent them to their mates. He mentioned it in a ‘hahaha I did this and you never knew’ way. I was so shocked I underreacted and was speechless. I wish I’d lost my tit at him.
Yes. It's illegal to share such a picture taken by someone else.Or is sharing it the crime they can be charged with?
Yes it is. They wouldn’t have been able to charge him if it wasn’t.If the photo he shared was available to the public on the internet and he shared it, I don't know if that's an offence?
Well it obviously is, otherwise he wouldn’t have been charged under the Sexual Offences Act.If the photo he shared was available to the public on the internet and he shared it, I don't know if that's an offence?
I didn't realise they'd charged him. Can she not find the original distributer and get the image wiped from the net too and find anyone else that's shared it since?Yes it is. They wouldn’t have been able to charge him if it wasn’t.
Also in general, if you distribute images of an illegal nature it’s illegal wether you took them or not.
That’s not her job. Annoying as she is, she’s the VICTIM. You don’t expect victims of other crimes to do their own investigating do you?I didn't realise they'd charged him. Can she not find the original distributer and get the image wiped from the net too and find anyone else that's shared it since?
Hopefully it will affect him gaining a visa to visit other countries. Imagine if he can't go to the states with his fiancée. He was probably hoping to get dual citizenship eventually.He won't go to prison, because almost no one would in that situation if its a first offence.
He'll most likely get a suspended sentence and a fine if he's found guilty.
The orange baboon seems to actively love right wing sex pests going to the USA so he'd probably be welcome joining Russell Brand, Andrew Tate and coHopefully it will affect him gaining a visa to visit other countries. Imagine if he can't go to the states with his fiancée. He was probably hoping to get dual citizenship eventually.
It's still on getty images. It was taken before the upskirting law came in and the tabloids printed it in the pastI didn't realise they'd charged him. Can she not find the original distributer and get the image wiped from the net too and find anyone else that's shared it since?
If Getty are sharing it then she'd be better going for them so no one can share it again and also could probably claim damages. Though no doubt she'll be happier seeing fox lose his home than having a million in the bankIt's still on getty images. It was taken before the upskirting law came in and the tabloids printed it in the past
Fox posted it because in the past she seemed happy about it and joked about the attention it got
Look what the nasty fucker wrote about her before deleting. Must have been hammering theAnother day where I feel incredible empathy for his children
He'll probably get away with it, but how delicious to hear 'has been charged' and 'will be in court'. Nasty fucker.
Allison Pearson who is defending him is a right bleep as wellLook what the nasty fucker wrote about her before deleting. Must have been hammering thelast night. Has the cheek to complain about the effect on his children. Never thinks about his children when he’s acting the bleep online though. Never the consequences of his own actions.