Lauren Goodger #26 Face the shape of dairylea, begging stuff for free, baybeh now in 4D

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Any of his stuff up for sale yet 👀👀🤣🤣
No but I do know what they had for dinner tonight, sadly we only saw the steak.
What I want to know is did she have both those steaks?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 10
No but I do know what they had for dinner tonight, sadly we only saw the steak.
What I want to know is did she have both those steaks?
Yes, she did. Wouldn’t let Charlie have one.

#freecharlie
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
Sorry - back - always watching the scrunchie crew. you guys give me joy after a terrible year.



What the duck is she doing? Commodity from the womb
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 11
Sorry - back - always watching the scrunchie crew. you guys give me joy after a terrible year.



What the duck is she doing? Commodity from the womb
She’s selling anything and everything in site. I wouldn’t be suprised if Charlie now only has one kidney left. she probably convinced him he didn’t need it.

Someone should tell her Placentas go for lots of money.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 18
Real Chanel is kind of like a Rolex in terms of not losing its value - like an investment really.

But like a Rolex - you need the validation.

The serial number, the monogram placing, quilting & the sizing.

Trainers - especially LV & CHANEL & FENDI & DIOR are a dead giveaway - it’s all to do with fabric, logo placing & sti

Balenciaga & McQueen is highly copied & easy to copy - weight is usually the give away. (I have real McQueens & Primark McQueens - the Primark ones are much comfier & I wear more - the McQueens weight is heavier - it was a little splurge) - this is NOT a brag. (I had to edit that as I am not a bragger)

Anyway, if someone’s who knows there stuff buys one of these items are they are fake -she’s FUCKED. As they will trash her - and she’s SKINT.

it must boil her piss that a bafta winner has been passed over for a baby shows by 10 year ex big brother contestant, a x factor reject - I don’t know who else is on the mtv show ....

The interest has gone aside from the Daily Mail - who use her for traffic.

Anyway, night all I can’t find my glasses, my dyslexia is silly tonight so apologises for mistakes x
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
Ooh Brows by Billie Jean won’t be happy, esp as she copped flack for breaking lockdown to do Loz’s topiary facial decorations 🙊
*Dances*
🎵🎵Billie Jean is not my brow Queen
I'm just a gel who wants a freeebieee done.
And Big Chaz is not my son 🎵🎵

Poor Brows by Billie Jean, now that is a mugging off.

 
  • Haha
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 20
She's having steaks for tea tonight.

She has also just posted photos of the scan thing and asked all the maniacs who follow her who the baby looks like. Everyone is saying "Daddy" and then someone is all "aw she has Mummy's lips" and I don't even think they are joking. Can not cope.
Difficult to tell if the kid looks like her seeing as SHE doesn't look like her any more. The only thing Lozza looks like is the sales catalogue from some shonky plastic surgeon's waiting room or an article detailing shocking surgery-gone-wrong

She won’t be happy that I think Charlie. Baby girl is a “mini me” remember?
Oh no! Not another one on that little number??

She is SUCH a bleeping moron! I can't imagine having time to think about tit like this as a grown up.
Well she is in for one mighty big shock when the baby arrives to ruin all her Me Time, when The New Management will decimate her self-devotion in one fell-swoop! Who is she going to deposit the the child onto so she can continue to live like this anyway? Not sure Chazza will be very keen either
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
So this week's content was about empathising with an influencer and the "Instagram v reality" issue whilst totally getting it the wrong way round lol. What's the betting we are going to get an up and coming edition (if they still keep publishing her dull ramblings) focusing on "poor private" Laura Whitmore's struggles with keeping her baby name private whilst creating a bloody Instagram page for her.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
I’m guessing she wasn’t a virtual escort though? I just find selling a photo of your tits somewhat different to meeting someone and potentially having sexual contact with them in terms of safety for the baby which would flag an issue for me where the father should definitely have a say.

I get it’s an emotive subject and I understands it sickens a lot of people, particularly if she’s moved into pregnancy fetish stuff.
In complete honesty and without going into a debate. Sex work is work and all sex work is sex work. Using unborn kids in sex work is wrong in my opinion, on any platform. And I know SO many SWers tell me I'm a shitebag for that but meh, it's my own principal as a parent.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14
She's having steaks for tea tonight.

She has also just posted photos of the scan thing and asked all the maniacs who follow her who the baby looks like. Everyone is saying "Daddy" and then someone is all "aw she has Mummy's lips" and I don't even think they are joking. Can not cope.
Porridge
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6
In complete honesty and without going into a debate. Sex work is work and all sex work is sex work. Using unborn kids in sex work is wrong in my opinion, on any platform. And I know SO many SWers tell me I'm a shitebag for that but meh, it's my own principal as a parent.
I don’t have kids and I’m not a sworker but I agree with you. It feels wrong. Each to their own but in this case she’s in the public domain and it’s all out there on the internet and it just doesn’t feel right. Sexualising yourself on innocent instagrams posts by panning onto you pregnant boobs all the time is weird. Unfortunately I think she will knowingly do this more by sharing feeding pictures all the time too. But, each to their own I guess, if she’s happy to put her daughter in that compromising position unborn and born than that shows her character. She better just stop bleeping lying in interviews about it and acting all wholly like she would never do stuff like that if she had a man and a kid.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 13
I don’t have kids and I’m not a sworker but I agree with you. It feels wrong. Each to their own but in this case she’s in the public domain and it’s all out there on the internet and it just doesn’t feel right. Sexualising yourself on innocent instagrams posts by panning onto you pregnant boobs all the time is weird. Unfortunately I think she will knowingly do this more by sharing feeding pictures all the time too. But, each to their own I guess, if she’s happy to put her daughter in that compromising position unborn and born than that shows her character. She better just stop bleeping lying in interviews about it and acting all wholly like she would never do stuff like that if she had a man and a kid.
As you say, she's insistent on trying to keep herself in the public domain, so her daughter absolutely will one day find out about this. So sad 😢
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 9
Had another look at her depop. The Prada high tops are fake, there is no branding to the side sole and the zip, though a copy of a Prada zip from a later line of shoes (Wheel style), shouldn’t be on a lace up pair unless it’s a side opening or an attached ankle purse. It’s a non functional zip which Prada don’t do.

The Mulberry clutch is an easy fake to spot as I have a (10 year old, the do last!) Mulberry work bag and I know what makes them authentic. The bag is trying to be a real clutch but the buttons on the front are missing the ‘tree’ logo and there’s no serial number. The inner logo should be heat pressed, not printed in a faded gold.

No one seems to be buying them, but her desperation for money shows how skint she really is that she’d happily cheat the few fans she has left.

The Adidas trainers are real, but fit for the bin! She says ‘worn a few times’ but they’ve clearly (look at the instep) gone through the washing machine and they’ve yellowed in the sun.

I don’t get why the papers run every daft Backgrid story on her when her willingness to defraud people / sell used tat is clearly far more interesting 🤣🤣
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 30
DA524928-084C-4C66-8D63-D18AF72602E5.jpeg

what the hell is this village idiot on about, ‘go half’s on a baby’, it’s not a bloody bill in a restaurant
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 32
I don’t have kids and I’m not a sworker but I agree with you. It feels wrong. Each to their own but in this case she’s in the public domain and it’s all out there on the internet and it just doesn’t feel right. Sexualising yourself on innocent instagrams posts by panning onto you pregnant boobs all the time is weird. Unfortunately I think she will knowingly do this more by sharing feeding pictures all the time too. But, each to their own I guess, if she’s happy to put her daughter in that compromising position unborn and born than that shows her character. She better just stop bleeping lying in interviews about it and acting all wholly like she would never do stuff like that if she had a man and a kid.
It was only 2019 she said she’d NEVER break girl code and date a Pricey ex! She says what makes her look best & then does the exact opposite. Beginning to think there’s little she wouldn’t do for money. Ok, nothing too illegal but she’s crossed a fair few moral borders already.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
View attachment 563289
what the hell is this village idiot on about, ‘go half’s on a baby’, it’s not a bloody bill in a restaurant
Why is she kissing Arg? 😳😆

Also I assume this is a lame attempt at trying to 'ramp up speculation' they are getting engaged, or are engaged 🙄
Newsflash you two: Nobody cares

They won't be making it down any aisle. She'll want to get her 'pre-baby body' back (what she actually means is that 6 months she was skinny by starving herself) and that won't come easy when she's got a newborn and she's a lazy mite at the best of times. The only reason she lost that weight was the lure of a workout DVD and there was money in it. There's no way their wedding will make much money so where's the incentive. Beside the fact that he'll have fully had enough of her by then.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 11
Real Chanel is kind of like a Rolex in terms of not losing its value - like an investment really.

But like a Rolex - you need the validation.

The serial number, the monogram placing, quilting & the sizing.

Trainers - especially LV & CHANEL & FENDI & DIOR are a dead giveaway - it’s all to do with fabric, logo placing & sti

Balenciaga & McQueen is highly copied & easy to copy - weight is usually the give away. (I have real McQueens & Primark McQueens - the Primark ones are much comfier & I wear more - the McQueens weight is heavier - it was a little splurge) - this is NOT a brag. (I had to edit that as I am not a bragger)

Anyway, if someone’s who knows there stuff buys one of these items are they are fake -she’s FUCKED. As they will trash her - and she’s SKINT.

it must boil her piss that a bafta winner has been passed over for a baby shows by 10 year ex big brother contestant, a x factor reject - I don’t know who else is on the mtv show ....

The interest has gone aside from the Daily Mail - who use her for traffic.

Anyway, night all I can’t find my glasses, my dyslexia is silly tonight so apologises for mistakes x
Her stuff reminds me of the fake designer bag I once bought in NY Chinatown. I don't buy designer labels, but I loved the olive green colour of this little handbag, and as I was contemplating whether it would clash with everything I ever wore, the vendor swapped out the metal logo on it and said, 'I'll make it Prada for you!'
I felt I had to buy it, and on the rare occasion I use it I feel I have to explain it before anyone judges me for the fakery. And it does clash with everything I wear, but I still love it, even though I'm pretty sure Prada has never made anything quite so hideous!

Her stuff reminds me of the fake designer bag I once bought in NY Chinatown. I don't buy designer labels, but I loved the olive green colour of this little handbag, and as I was contemplating whether it would clash with everything I ever wore, the vendor swapped out the metal logo on it and said, 'I'll make it Prada for you!'
I felt I had to buy it, and on the rare occasion I use it I feel I have to explain it before anyone judges me for the fakery. And it does clash with everything I wear, but I still love it, even though I'm pretty sure Prada has never made anything quite so hideous!
I tell a lie, I splurge on Chanel perfume!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.