Either way though she was gifted an £800 plus pram for free. Which not everyone can afford especially with their third child as money can be tighter.She contradicted herself a bit in that pram review too, saying the pram is fine for quick trip to the shops then at the end saying its not ideal for a quick trip to the shops.
Notice how the introduction said she had a nearly 3 year old but the whole review she was saying shes got a 2 year old. Is that so people won't comment why her nearly 3 year old needs to be in a pram all the time when shes perfectly capable of walking or to make it sound like shes got a smaller age gap than she has ?
Then she said it has 30 different positions then said the possibilities are endless ?? No hun. Just the 30 positions ?and shes tried them all? Yeh right.
I don't think her "review" was good at all.
It didn't show off the pram as much as it could have. Very poor review.
No wonder the brand or whoever shes been working with for the last few weeks decided to go with someone who would do the same for free. I think it's actually because the other person is just better than she is. The quality is just not there with her so I'm not surprised they didn't want to pay her
That should have been classed as an add, and should be part of her taxable income too I think