I have been feeling increasingly more uncomfortable with the way she is using her daughters - Abi in particular. The night nappies being shared with all at a sensitive age with her at school, the constant shaming over fussiness/meltdowns/picky eating etc. Yes, this may resonate with other parents, but is it fair to put all this out there on social media where it will be accessible forever. I have already heard that school kids will scroll through parents feeds to find embarrassing material on their classmates.I've watched her fairly appalling attempts at content with bemusement up until now but this is the first thing that has upset me. Exploiting your child for content is absolutely horrendous. It is unkind and will have repercussions. When these kids are older and their peers have access to social media they are going to get DESTROYED at school.
This, 100%. I never agree with children being used for social media content, but you could argue that at least some of them get something positive out of it (few holidays and/or days out, toys, clothes, etc.) even though it doesn’t make up for the loss of privacy. Kelly’s kids get nothing at all.I have been feeling increasingly more uncomfortable with the way she is using her daughters - Abi in particular. The night nappies being shared with all at a sensitive age with her at school, the constant shaming over fussiness/meltdowns/picky eating etc. Yes, this may resonate with other parents, but is it fair to put all this out there on social media where it will be accessible forever. I have already heard that school kids will scroll through parents feeds to find embarrassing material on their classmates.
The constant disinterested face/raised eyebrow etc reels are now just tedious and just makes her look like a grump who loathes her kids. I don't doubt that she loves them but what she is doing isn't demonstrating love. It is using them for content to try and boost number for her own selfish means. The career pivot is weird. Butlins, pasties, Maom? Really Kelly? Really worth selling your daughter's childhood and privacy?
Just frequently shamed and embarrassed, poor things.This, 100%. I never agree with children being used for social media content, but you could argue that at least some of them get something positive out of it (few holidays and/or days out, toys, clothes, etc.) even though it doesn’t make up for the loss of privacy. Kelly’s kids get nothing at all.
I don't know how to start a thread but Mum and a Mic needs one. She has gone from funny and watchable to utter d*ckhead.Mum and a Mic is blatantly so trying to blag a freebie brunch - such a shameless grifter!
I thought this too when I saw her latest story on bottomless brunch!Mum and a Mic is blatantly so trying to blag a freebie brunch - such a shameless grifter!
She doesnt even bother to say WHY she needs a bottomless brunch! Shameless!Yeah Mum and a Mic’s reels can be way funnier than Kelly and yes she doesn’t show he kids but I’m noticing a shift into a mega humble bragging grifter, hence doing my public service and starting the thread on her
I wonder when she's going to stop buying the followers? So damn obvious that's what she's doing.Nearly 80k
Lol you mean Kelly putting a saucepan on her head and banging it wasn’t quality content?!Her content and reels just seem to lack any effort or planning recently. I get the WhatsApp ones probably take a while but others are very shoddy.
Lol did she? Never mind the kids schooling - she needs to take a long hard look at her parenting!Her latest reel is a bit awkward pretending to be "Jesus" when she had to pretend to be a Jesus worshipper for 2 years in order to get her kids into a church school outside catchment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?