Fair enough.
Personally, I see this as a sexualised image of a minor, which is wrong. If it was a similar shot of a girl, I suspect the reaction would be much stronger.
Just my opinion though!
Fair enough.It's not appropriate at all.
I agree on both counts.Fair enough.
Personally, I see this as a sexualised image of a minor, which is wrong. If it was a similar shot of a girl, I suspect the reaction would be much stronger.
Just my opinion though!
Whoops, sorry, I read your comment as ‘it’s not inappropriate at all’ - been a long day!!I agree on both counts.
Also fucking hot as Katie's kebab.Whoops, sorry, I read your comment as ‘it’s not inappropriate at all’ - been a long day!!
Think you're 100% right
SO is this the electric chair that poor dog 'suffocated' in. Now no way did he crawl under as there is no under!! Only the front where the electric footrest is. So someone was definitely fucking around with the controls and if so would have seen the dog go near if and seen it being crushed!!! This was no accident at all
Without going round in circles, Katie could not legally prevent him from seeing Harvey; she had no means of 'blocking' him. I work in the family court system. Although it's an expensive and laborious process access is not difficult to obtain unless the non-resident parent is abusive, or has other issues that pose a danger to the child. There is no way that someone of Dwight Yorke's status and wealth would have had ANY difficulty obtaining access through legal channels. No way.He tried his best via the legal route and pricey threw up every barrier she could.He's even said in an interview that he's been to H's school so he was trying to connect with him away from geriatric barbie's control.
And yes he certainly DID pay and even had a special sensory room built in his home for Harvey that the child never set foot in because his mother is a vicious nasty arsehole.
This is all in Yorke's biography which was serialised years ago in the paps and pricey never denied it because she couldn't as it was true and he had bank statements to prove he was paying for H's full time carer (Amy).
She still has this scooter, she abandoned it when it got a flat tire, it's decaying outside her unwanted home. Yet another expensive item she has bought and discarded.She did/does. She is just a disgusting beggar.
I'm sorry babe but hat's just not true though. There are many many ways vicious exes can stall court proceedings.Without going round in circles, Katie could not legally prevent him from seeing Harvey; she had no means of 'blocking' him. I work in the family court system. Although it's an expensive and laborious process access is not difficult to obtain unless the non-resident parent is abusive, or has other issues that pose a danger to the child. There is no way that someone of Dwight Yorke's status and wealth would have had ANY difficulty obtaining access. No way.
KP being 'forced' to have Harvey for lockdown doesn't ring true to me either - if he was in a residential home then she made the choice to have him with her rather than not be able to see him for some time, which I sympathise with from a mother's point of view but whether she made that decision with his best interests at heart is questionable, especially when a lot of the publicity she's had recently has been through him so I wonder if that was at least part of the reason she wanted him with her.I would think the worry is more about H and how/why he's ballooned to 27st and been hospitalised twice in the short time she's been forced to have him in her home due to lockdown. Also her blatant disregard of the rules for shielding him. No masks and lots of Toms Dicks and Harrys floating around like unflushable turds in her house.
Just seen that Junior has been reading and replying to some of the comments on his picture, Katie needs to turn those comments off on posts of her kids or better yet don’t post pictures of a child flexing his abs for the internet!Just seen this - I don’t agree with kids on Instagram, nor though do I agree with grown men (ha!) making comments like to a childThis is the problem with letting kids onto social media, particularly in the public eye, there’s always going to be people like this bloke about
No she knew that she was going to have nothing to sell to the papers through lock down pure and simple..KP being 'forced' to have Harvey for lockdown doesn't ring true to me either - if he was in a residential home then she made the choice to have him with her rather than not be able to see him for some time, which I sympathise with from a mother's point of view but whether she made that decision with his best interests at heart is questionable, especially when a lot of the publicity she's had recently has been through him so I wonder if that was at least part of the reason she wanted him with her.
Sorry babe, you're wrong on this one.I'm sorry babe but hat's just not true though. There are many many ways vicious exes can stall court proceedings.
Why do you think Fathers for Justice was set up and is so popular among men trying to get access to their children?
I’m just chiming in to agree with you! My father is a family law barrister, a man like Dwight Yorke could absolutely have access if he really wanted it. There is no way Katie could have genuinely don’t much to prevent him. I don’t like the woman at all but trying to pain him as some poor, unfortunate, hard done by father (like so many actually are) is just silly.Sorry babe, you're wrong on this one.
Dwight is a deadbeat, and your obsession with supporting her exes is bizzare. They're all dubious characters in their own right.
If you don't have the mental strength and the finances, it can be difficult to navigate the court system. There are men who give up - hence FFJ. However, you're not always hearing the full truth with their stories either.
The reality is that you can represent yourself in court and lower the costs. It can take months or years, but men have a legal right to access (barring abusive or other criminal behaviour), the issues usually arise when women make false claims of abusive behaviour either towards themselves, the children, or both. These claims have to be investigated...it can take months or years and sometimes a judge will side with a mother even when there is little or no evidence. This leaves the father fighting for limited access (contact centres etc).
The family court system is still unfortunately skewed in favour of the mother. However, someone with the money Dwight Yorke has would never have an issue with access. He could be in/out of court all day long. He didn't try because he didn't want to. She simply could not prevent someone with equal parental responsibility by LAW from seeing their child! It's delusional to suggest otherwise.
What?So another KP thread closed I think the posters knew it would be closed
We attempted to leave this open in the hopes that previously closed threads would be an indicator of what is acceptable and what isn't. Despite this comments are still having to be removed for insults about her appearance and intrusive and unnecessary comments about her sex life. These are completely unnecessary and uncalled for are are clearly outlined as being unacceptable in our Community Guidelines. This thread isn't providing any productive discussion so we're closing this and taking action against those breaching our Community Guidelines.
Thread on DS,third one closed in couple of days.What?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?