Agreed that it'll be something like this, or the other possibility I see is that she'll have been quietly let go for some breach of a 'social media policy' by announcing Steve's suspension / alleged racist remark to her thousands of followers.Still don’t think she’ll be back on the airwaves. It wouldn’t surprise me if RJF’s theory is true that this was all orchestrated by the SMHR Committee in an attempt to banish ar Kate from the airwaves after the show became inundated and overwhelmed with emails. I still find it bizarre that she supposedly worked there for several years yet the minute the opportunity arises for her to present her radio show in a solo capacity, they get rid.
Either that, or they have offered her her old role back but because she’s been out of a rhythm for some time now, she will have convinced herself that bowls must take precedence over all else and she’s rejected their offer in favour of the blue rinse brigade up Foxhill.
I worked in a volunteer organisation some years ago which was also media-facing, and volunteers had to sign a social media agreement. I'd be surprised if Kate didn't have to do the same, and considering other past incidents influenced by her online following (notoriously the 'it'll take the bleep ages' debacle) I could see her not being asked back.
On that, I suspect it's more she's been not asked back, rather than 'sacked', as we'd have heard about it from her by now surely if sacked.