Johnny Depp and Amber Heard #25

[SynthGirl]

I presume prior to this that Elaine was a fairly decent lawyer.
I honestly think she has fallen victim to AH. You can see in trial where Elaine is almost holding back tears and getting a roasting from AH. I've never seen a lawyer look so vulnerable before.
AH is gaslighting her. She is using Elaine for her own means.

I'm going to hazard a guess that AH has told Elaine that 'this is all your fault - how are you going to fix it?' and this has prompted Elaine to do the interview.

Elaine is completely blinded by the truth, she has been utterly unprofessional to blame this on the jury without genuine reason to do so.

And don't get me started on AH first words being 'I am so sorry to all those women...'
HE SUED HER! She didn't come to court to fight for other women, she came to court because she defamed him. No way in God's name did these words ever come out her mouth.

I feel sorry for Elaine. I imagine over the course of the trial, behind the scenes, Amber has gone off on her and the rest of her team, but especially Amber. Elaine put her all into representing her client, and it takes an emotional toll on you when you have a huge loss as far as the jury verdict.

 

[SpookyLumberjack]

View attachment 1315245

This 'former' appeared last night:

 

[Dotty Merton]

Former porner boner honer Heard will be needing a gig down tesco, oh no, they brought in robots already!

 

[Beverly hills housewife]

Anyone in Ireland and listen to the Louise McSharry podcast? She and Cassie Delaney are completely of the view that this is all based in misogyny, men have the power, feminism has never been more important, etc. They say it has been proven that Depp physically abused Heard on multiple occasions- which, eh, the whole point of the outcome of the trial was that that was not proven at all?! Isn't this podcast further defaming him?

It just doesn't sit right with me that certain sections of the media seem incapable of viewing this case as an outlier. Even legal experts have said it's highly unusual in a number of respects. It's not indicative of the progress or lack thereof of any movement, it's not setting women back, it doesn't mean women won't be believed. Why must we view it in the context of all women everywhere?!

All it means is that in this particular case, Heard was not deemed to have told the truth, and therefore she had defamed Depp by saying he abused her. If you accept that that is the case, then surely the only logical conclusion is that it is Amber Heard setting women back (even though she isn't, because again, she's not representative of all women everywhere), not Johnny Depp for trying to clear his name.

The nicest thing I can say about people who view it this way is that their natural instinct is to believe women, because why would someone make up something so horrible? But you should really never sit on a jury if your default stance is to believe everything a woman says, purely because she is a woman. It doesn't mean you start out suspicious of her or default to *not* believing her, it just means you assess the facts dispassionately to determine whether something has been proven. I do believe that's what this jury did.

She put up a post on twitter the other day saying "duck Johnny Depp". Roe McDermott is another one who is very vocal about it

 

[Dotty Merton]

She put up a post on twitter the other day saying "duck Johnny Depp". Roe McDermott is another one who is very vocal about it

I have only seen one post on my normal persons social media, v clever female friend in support of JD, everyone else is posting pix of roses and festivals and enjoying the good life, good on 'em, beauty and family are what we fight for if we must.

but there was one interesting post from a lad I knew way back when in me nawty rave dayzzz when we all got gobby about the beatsperminute situation, he said there's a bunch loada people on their way to London dressed as Jack Sparrow, said it could be like santacon with scabbards, they are meeting the gang with Prince Andrew masks who are only eating pizza under Nelsons column, again...... I don't if its a jest or not!

I'll have a go at starting a new thread.....

Johnny Depp & Amber Heard #26

Johnnies won in USA but now all eyes on Britain, god save the Queen! (have you ever looked at a word so much it starts to look wrong? I am getting that with Johnny, the h's and n's are dancin' before me eyes) 😂

tattle.life

 

[Wilkco]

Sharon Osbourne reveals the 'real' Johnny Depp after his victory in Amber Heard trial

The Pirates of the Caribbean star won his defamation case

www.hellomagazine.com

Sharon Osbourne shows her support for Johnny Depp as he wins trial

The actor, 58, had sued his ex-wife Amber Heard for $50million over a 2018 piece that alleged she was a victim of abuse. Speaking of the result, Sharon said she was surprised Johnny won.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Who is she supporting?

 

[LydiaDeetzHat]

I feel sorry for Elaine. I imagine over the course of the trial, behind the scenes, Amber has gone off on her and the rest of her team, but especially Amber. Elaine put her all into representing her client, and it takes an emotional toll on you when you have a huge loss as far as the jury verdict.

I did... as i have posted here before.. could not have been easy for her in several respects.. UNTIL she started doing these interviews, brainwashed and gaslighting.. and the slander OMG of the judge and jury is disgusting. I stopped feeling for her the second she had the jury polled as if to imply that they were lying about the unanimity

 

[louseylou]

The last behaviour panel video about this trial. I've watched a good few of their videos now (not just about this trial) and I always find what they say fascinating.