She's an incredible woman. Whitney was damn lucky to have her to go to.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I totally agree with all of this. I also in no way think Johnny was completely innocent, he did and said some questionable things but I think it’s clear he isn’t and never has been an abusive partner. Living with a narcissist isn’t easy, so I really don’t blame him for having his issues. I’m amazed he survived it all and is now trying to piece his life and reputation back together. HE is the survivor who has found their voice not her.
I do think she's secretly Team Johnny. It's just a feeling.
I had a dream last night that whitney stood up an shouted "I have something to say" they told her to tit down and she shouted "I lied, I HAVE LIED" then she started shouting out what the lies where before the jury got shoved out!!
I'm going to be asking my crystals today for this to happen haha
I'm going to be asking my crystals today for this to happen haha
Manifest the tit out of this dream
Imagine it was a premonition.. let’s hope so. Let’s all ask the universe for this. MANIFEST!!
I mean I would love him to say “you’ll all remember this as the day you almost caught Captain Jack Sparrow”Just doing the housework and thinking.. if () Johnny wins. How powerful would it be to start his speech outside the court with "I johnny Depp am a victim of domestic violence"
Right.. must do housework!!
I know it’ll never happen but imagine
maybe he’s just a much better actor..
I honestly don’t know what to think anymore, the evidence is a lot. The jury have a tough job ahead of them, and their decision will be analysed in detail across the western media. I certainly don’t envy them!Considering she was a Marine, left to study law and then noticed an increased number of service men in her court, because of the effects of PTSD and their struggles to return to society and did someone thing about it to help them rather than prosecute them, I think she must have some insight indeed.
Haha how weird. - I dreamt something similar!
I work
I worked for The Guardian for over 20 years and it is one of the few national newspapers with any regard for normal people. It has no rich owner calling the shots and no allegiance to any political party. You won’t always agree with it but at least there is no Murdoch pulling the strings. Just because you don’t agree with a particular stance it takes doesn’t mean that it is a “rag.” If you really want to see what a “rag” is read The Sun,Mail and Express.
On it!!!
You know what I was thinking yesterday when we were talking about it, that Whitney probably would put her baby (or babies) in a safe area - out of Amber's reach and then declare that she lied and wanted to stand up to her sister.
No, I agree, I would take the time to properly review the evidence. Make time lines, I would have a whole time line on a wall.maybe he’s just a much better actor..
I would equally go witness by witness and ask if they were credible, or even compare like witness to like witness, who do we believe more.
Go piece of evidence by piece of evidence and make a pile of what we believe we can trust and can't.
That way no one can say after they were pressured to agree.
Thankfully where I live we don't have jury's, but if I ever landed up on one I honestly feel sorry for my fellow jurors, because I don't mess around.
I have German blood and can be quiet detailed. I also believe in doing a job right the first time and doing it properly. If I am going to be stuck there, away from my family, unable to have proper conversations, for an extended period of time, I'm not going to waste my time and stand the chance of prolonging it any longer than it has to.
In this case especially because it is one of the steps to help bring proper equality to society.... eventually... hopefully.
But when you just rely on a Judge, you get the UK result! And the Meghan Markle not letting case go to a proper trial result.
I know... I didn't say jury's were bad, just that we don't have them where I live.
And yes, the judge can make unwise decisions, I urge you to see what kind of sentence Oscar Pistorius got and make up your own mind.
Another Narc, except this one killed his partner.
Well I’m a “normal person” and I don’t think the Guardian has any particular regard for me. And I don’t know about party allegiance but it’s undeniable that a lot of their writers share an allegiance to a certain set of political and ideological viewpoints.
In the Depp/Heard case it’s seeing everything through the lens of #believeallwomen and distorting their reporting to promote that particular agenda. That’s reasonable in a column or opinion piece where at least people know that a particular viewpoint is being expressed, but it’s not ok at all in reporting a high-profile case like this. It is dishonest and manipulative, and exactly the same sort of thing that infuriates people about the other publications you mention.
Last edited:
Her saying it, us hearing it, and that being what she said: are four quite separate things.
I didn't realise that the judge in the UK case is a personal friend of Rupert Murdock and his son works for Talk Radio which is owned by the Murdock empire. It seems very shady to me.
- Status