The public opinion about this to me is extremely interesting, and quite revealing.
All I see based on evidence so far is JD as the face of DARVO. His every answer is “I don’t remember, I don’t recall, but that definitely never happened”.
A lot of his “evidence” to discredit Amber is misogynistic and not even relevant. If she used him for fame and fortune, so what? That doesn’t mean she deserved to be hit. Also with the cheating, the bisexuality, even the alleged defecation in their bed - none of it is relevant in terms of his defending himself from being called a “wife beater”.
It’s interesting to me that he denies almost everything that happened where he could be blamed and claims she made everything up and faked it all, whereas Amber doesn’t deny anything happening as far as I have seen, she just has a different story to him as to how injuries occured. When he can’t deny something he says he can’t remember, which seems to happen a lot. I don’t think his drug use puts him as the best witness to defend himself.
I don’t think Amber is innocent at all, but I do think there is no such thing as a perfect victim, and that victims of domestic abuse can retaliate and do ugly, awful things to their abusers. I think they are going to have experts talking about this later in the trial.
At best, they are as bad as each other, but I just cannot see how it is possible that Depp is innocent at this stage.
I think his ego and desire to ruin AH were very clear from The Rolling Stone piece, and this is what’s led him to sue The Sun.