Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

JAR21

VIP Member
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 9
I had the impression that the horrible relationship with AH and the trial were quite therapeutic for him.

When he testified he said that he realised that a lot of his childhood traumas had been reenacted with AH.

Trauma is often the reason for drink and drug abuse and maybe he is now able to be less dependent on these narcotics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9

JAR21

VIP Member
My friend and I were just talking about how the media was trying to tell what happened in the trial even though we were watching it live. They really tried to get us to believe that what we were seeing and hearing live was not what happened. It's the first time I ever really noticed the media trying to twist things or rather paid attention to it.
That was the advantage of it being broadcast live. If it hadn't been, people would have believed what was printed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9

terfette

Chatty Member
I’ve just found these threads. Very glad that it’s not pro heard. I’m sure Johnny, as a millionaire well known (at least past) fan of drugs, has his faults. But the things she said even about that didn’t make sense. The “cavity search” she claimed he performed in order to find his cocaine for example. She also claimed he keeps his cocaine in a huge jar, which she gesticulated to be bigger than her own head. I’m sure Johnny, in his nearly 60 years of living, is familiar with the female anatomy. So why would he be looking there for his massive jar cocaine? If it were a small amount, being a millionaire, it seems unlikely he would waste time performing such a search, when in that time he could have had more cocaine dropped off at his house. I believe she has either googled or her involvement with me too has given her exposure to stories of women from more common financial backgrounds, where drug addicts do end up doing these things.


Anyway, that’s just one of the things I found contradictory about her claims. I disliked her before this because she is a wel known and documented abuser. There are videos of her abusing her sister online. She is a weapons grade cunt.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 9

Influncer Snarker

VIP Member
I'm sorry but there's no way you were on places like TikTok and Twitter if you think like that. It was a sudden avalanche of pro-Depp posts and comments. You would have to have actively sought out positive comments about Amber amidst the tidal wave of Amber Turd stuff.

You would be wise to not talk about podcasts you haven't listened to as well.
Who pissed in your cornflakes this morning?? No need for the patronising tone. I know exactly where I was when all of this was going down.

You would be wise to broaden your view on everything surrounding this case.

Peace out 😘
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

evoway13

VIP Member
The thread is here.



You can sort of make out his argument from the replies- his argument is based on contract law, and makes assertions about the contents of the settlement which he has not seen (and may not actually exist)... as by all accounts nothing has been filed with the court.

All that has actually happened is they have dropped the appeals.
Which is somewhat surprising in Johnny's case, given that it relates to attorney client privilege, and unethical conduct by Elaine.

But we shall see.
I have a theory as to why he's decided to settle......that being POTC 6.....He wanted it done and dusted as the rumour mill is suggesting filming will start in 2023-2024. Emily D Baker said the appeal could be two years away. Depp has proven his point, despite Heard twisting the narrative again
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

clueless

Chatty Member
I am angry thinking about the C4 documentary episodes... I knew rightly they would do this. Why are the MSM still so reluctant to see that Johnny was a victim to this psycho bitch? It's absolutely awful.

It's crazy how the Aquaman 2 saga is still ongoing though, it feels like it's the longest film to ever be made! Have they still not finished it 😂

JD was dropped like a stone from Disney the minute she opened her lying trap with her lies, yet WB can't even find the guts to do the same to her. Why are they so hesitant? Why are they keeping her at all, even if they've cut her down to 10 minutes? If it had have been a man, there would be no will-they-won't-they, no question or cutting down to a lesser time, it would have been a recast, no matter how inconvenient it might have been. I am wondering if they're trying to use the situation for hype and get more people to go and watch the film, but I personally find it would do the opposite, it's off putting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

evoway13

VIP Member
To claim she is an Israeli citizen , she must have resided in Israel for a minimum of three out of five years. To get citizenship over here in the UK, you must have 'indefinite leave to remain' - for 5 years plus another 12 months on top. Amber is a trier 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂. It's only a few months since she sold her house in California!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8

Eye_Spy

Chatty Member
But…it’s her making the statement? I’m not aware he has ever mentioned her name. Her statement is a bit weird “leave US alone” seeing as she appears to be speaking for him as well as herself.

If as she claims, she has never met him, she might just have said it that way as a general swipe at the way the media constantly speculate over celebrities. I’m inclined to believe her, to claim they aren’t dating and by lying is one thing…but to claim she has never met him and by lying is another…it would only take one photo or “source close to the star” to make her appear dishonest.

I think it’s media nonsense, they’ve been linked because they both know Tim Burton, there’s no other obvious reason for the link. Tim and JD haven’t worked together for years and there is no public information that they’ve been socialising within the timeframe he has filmed with Jenna, plus there’s no evidence that Jenna socialised even with Tim outside of work.

Unfortunately JD’s name is now such easy clickbait that this stuff can’t be prevented. If he responds to rumours they will just write more clickbait about his reply and make even more ad money from using his name…so unless it’s a really serious allegation the best way for the stories to go away naturally is to not comment at all. If he takes a newspaper to court for lying he has to prove they knew they were lying and prove the harm that it has done him…as there are too many papers and stories, many of which are only doing small damage at a time. It would cost millions and not achieve anything. He upset the media by suing The Sun, they reacted by using safety in numbers by all writing these type of gossip unfounded stories about him to make it clear they won’t allow him to stop them making money off his name or allow him to have control over what they write.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

wibble

VIP Member
Quelle surprise the misinformation fairies are falling for Amber's spin.

Assuming Amber comes out of hiding in her efforts to dodge testifying in the insurance case - she would be extremely ill-advised to repeat anything related to this case.

But then she was extremely ill-advised to throw her lot in with Michelle Dauber and the easy money activists, on the rubber chicken charity circuit in the first place.

It would be interesting to see what part Warner Brothers played in this...
As they are currently sitting on two toxic properties - Aquaman 2 and The Flash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

Zxx1

Active member
Do they really need to gag her though? The majority of the public don’t believe a word she says now anyway and you can see from the interview she did after the trial that she makes herself look worse every time she opens her mouth.
I don’t think his career will ever go back to how it was before but he’s doing a lot better than she is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

Silverspin

Active member

Seems she's definitely the problem.
'She was just so toxic', Kimbal says. 'A nightmare'. Musk's chief of staff Sam Teller compares her to a comic-book villain.
there's so much she has done and so many situations she has been in where no male would survive the press..

e.g. arrested for supposedly beating her wife in public in an airport while intoxicated and unresponsive, got off on technicality & the beaten spouse not wanting to press charges, walking round with Elon wearing shiners like he hasnt been seen with before or after, stays with Depp in Australia & he winds up emerging from their rental missing part of his finger & with a cigarette scorch on his cheek, her prime supposed witness in her case against Depp & former bestie no longer associates with Amber cause Amber *punched* her in the face when they were out shopping together, Ambers sister was on a reality TV show & her co-stars checked out marks on her chest and forehead/scalp after a fight with Amber whilst the sister tried to brush it off and hide it.

guess we can sit round for 35 years and read the biography her kid will write about who else she sees Mum knock bells out of
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8

wibble

VIP Member
This report... mainly stuff cribbed from twitter...


The IBT report....

 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 8