- Notice
StarGZR528
Active member
Prefrontalmedialcortex
VIP Member
Amber Heard’s a twat. Pass it on.
wibble
VIP Member
annanuttall
VIP Member
caroleffinbaskin
VIP Member
Urgh what a horrible house - it looks like a public toilet in Tenerife!TMZ tweeted about this, with the focus on that she sold it at a profitthey honestly disgust me. Well if she's managed to profit one million then only nine more to go
Dotty Merton
VIP Member
allo, allo, someones got the happy up 'im!
Maleficent50
VIP Member
This pisses me off. Amber is an abuser. Why are MSM given her airtime? Imagine if it was the other way around? It wouldn’t happen. Did Chris Brown get to give “his side” after he battered Rihanna? No. Scamber Turd needs to get in the bin!
annanuttall
VIP Member
wibble
VIP Member
Picking up from the last thread...
In the Savannah Guthrie interview Amber stated "I should not have had to donate it in an attempt to be believed."
The obvious response is the London judge dismissed the gold-digging claims because she had donated the $7m settlement.
However Emily D Baker raised an interesting point that maybe Amber was talking about the divorce negotiations. And by implication she never intended to donate the money: or perhaps never expected anyone to check (certainly no-one had checked by the time of the London trial four years later) (for now we needn't go into if any of the payments made in her name were ever made by her)
There is some debate about who started the divorce proceedings and when....
This exchange neatly sums up the current debate....
The details of the exchange may not be correct...
But that doesn't matter....
So much as Laura Wasser saying...
Thus the question of the pre-nup, the hoax and the gold-digging was apparently in the air.
Amber's explanation that she was entitled to more than the $7m is fine in so far as it goes: the figure bandied about by her supporters is $30m... which happens to be, according to Mr White (Johnny's business manager), roughly what she got when the her debts were written off, various other items and the tax free element of the payments are accounted for.
.... but why did she say she would donate any of it to charity in the first place?
One explanation is Jennifer Howell, who had given a character witness statement for Amber (for the dog smuggling case (I think)) and was expecting a donation after the divorce to the Art of Elysium. Which didn't happen because Amber, or her publicist, considered the charity too small and wanted to donate to a more high-profile charity for more publicity.
But that only explains where the money was intended: it doesn't explain why any money was ever pledged...
Particularly when the new talking point of the Amber-stans is "it was her money, she could do what she likes with it."
Which is true....
except why in an interview immediately after the Virginia trial....
in which she made herself look a fool and a liar by saying, "I use the words pledge and donate synonomously," - and surely knowing what the London judge said in his judgement - a judgement Amber and her supporters constantly point to....
why would she say, "I should not have had to donate it in an attempt to be believed."?
What the fuck is she talking about?
Or is this just more Amberspeak?
Beyond the understanding of average randos.....
In the Savannah Guthrie interview Amber stated "I should not have had to donate it in an attempt to be believed."
The obvious response is the London judge dismissed the gold-digging claims because she had donated the $7m settlement.
However Emily D Baker raised an interesting point that maybe Amber was talking about the divorce negotiations. And by implication she never intended to donate the money: or perhaps never expected anyone to check (certainly no-one had checked by the time of the London trial four years later) (for now we needn't go into if any of the payments made in her name were ever made by her)
There is some debate about who started the divorce proceedings and when....
This exchange neatly sums up the current debate....
The details of the exchange may not be correct...
But that doesn't matter....
So much as Laura Wasser saying...
Thus the question of the pre-nup, the hoax and the gold-digging was apparently in the air.
Amber's explanation that she was entitled to more than the $7m is fine in so far as it goes: the figure bandied about by her supporters is $30m... which happens to be, according to Mr White (Johnny's business manager), roughly what she got when the her debts were written off, various other items and the tax free element of the payments are accounted for.
.... but why did she say she would donate any of it to charity in the first place?
One explanation is Jennifer Howell, who had given a character witness statement for Amber (for the dog smuggling case (I think)) and was expecting a donation after the divorce to the Art of Elysium. Which didn't happen because Amber, or her publicist, considered the charity too small and wanted to donate to a more high-profile charity for more publicity.
But that only explains where the money was intended: it doesn't explain why any money was ever pledged...
Particularly when the new talking point of the Amber-stans is "it was her money, she could do what she likes with it."
Which is true....
except why in an interview immediately after the Virginia trial....
in which she made herself look a fool and a liar by saying, "I use the words pledge and donate synonomously," - and surely knowing what the London judge said in his judgement - a judgement Amber and her supporters constantly point to....
why would she say, "I should not have had to donate it in an attempt to be believed."?
What the fuck is she talking about?
Or is this just more Amberspeak?
Beyond the understanding of average randos.....
Xales
VIP Member
Those notes prove nothing. They are the same as all her 'mates' on the stand they are all Amber said.
I wonder if they didn't call the doctor because it would be yet another person going 'Didn't see it happen. Didn't see any marks/bruises.'
Amber doesn't seem to grasp that.
Johnny had pictures of his finger and doctor's/surgeons notes about it. Something happened to his finger. If he did it or she did it only the two of them will ever know. Maybe not even then considering the quantity of drugs/drink they were doing.
There is hard evidence there of damage though.
I wonder if they didn't call the doctor because it would be yet another person going 'Didn't see it happen. Didn't see any marks/bruises.'
Amber doesn't seem to grasp that.
Johnny had pictures of his finger and doctor's/surgeons notes about it. Something happened to his finger. If he did it or she did it only the two of them will ever know. Maybe not even then considering the quantity of drugs/drink they were doing.
There is hard evidence there of damage though.
Xales
VIP Member
She shouldn't have to donate the money to be believed she was abused.
She should have to donate the money to be believed that she had donated (not pledged) the money as she said she had and that she wasn't lying about it.
If she is lying about this which is easily discovered/disproved and then is arguing the semantics of pledged/donated on the stand it makes the 'average' person doubt her honesty.
That then questions if you can believe she was abused. Especially when you throw in duplicated evidence which she also got smart about the metadata for on the stand plus altered pictures as separate pictures.
She should have to donate the money to be believed that she had donated (not pledged) the money as she said she had and that she wasn't lying about it.
If she is lying about this which is easily discovered/disproved and then is arguing the semantics of pledged/donated on the stand it makes the 'average' person doubt her honesty.
That then questions if you can believe she was abused. Especially when you throw in duplicated evidence which she also got smart about the metadata for on the stand plus altered pictures as separate pictures.
HoGi
VIP Member
Most successful DC film of all time.
Tells you everything you need to know about DC films
I reckon it was only most successful due to the hoards of women who love Jason Mamoa who went to see it and wouldn't ordinarily watch a DC film
Last edited:
buttheyneverblindme8
Well-known member
First time poster on this thread, and I'm just here to say it was fascinating watching Dr Shannon Curry's testimony literally manifest itself in Heard in the next days. She was spot on in her assessment. Everything she said was accurate.
The jury made the right decision. Her own words, actions and behaviour saw to that. And she absolutely shat on the bed.
The jury made the right decision. Her own words, actions and behaviour saw to that. And she absolutely shat on the bed.
K18
VIP Member
Seems like someone is trying to stop people using their voices. Funny how she has accused Depp of doing that to her.
K18
VIP Member
Exactly, of course he is going to be jealous and feeling insecure if his wife is having multiple affairs. Perhaps he might of even drank a bit too much and took some of those painkillers he was addicted too to help cope with the pain she was causing him. We only know of 3 for definite but I would bet big money that there was more.
LydiaDeetzHat
VIP Member
i'd like to know how much the so called Twitter Journo Eve Barlow makes from her bullshit and obsessively posting about Amber and her friends..
SnoopySnooper86
Chatty Member
I’m so over Amber, can she just fuck off now.
evoway13
VIP Member
I don't feel sorry for Amber as she is the reason this entire fracas started.......however, I think she needs psychological help